Restaurant chain meals with more calories than a fast-food takeaway

RESTAURANT chains serve meals that are more calorie-packed than those sold by fast-food companies, say researchers.

They found that the average meal in a ‘full-service’ diner contained an astonishing 1,033 calories, while dishes from takeaway chains had an average of 751.

The researchers from the University of Liverpool said their ‘shocking’ findings probably underestimated the number of calories consumed because they did not include drinks, starters, desserts or side orders.

Experts said food outlets were helping fuel Britain’s obesity crisis by serving ‘excessive’ meals. Out of the 27 chains assessed, only one – Leon – sells food with an average of less than the 600-calorie maximum recommended by public health officials. Hungry Horse, which runs 284 pubrestaurants across Britain, has the most calorie-packed food of those surveyed, with an average meal containing 1,358.

For those with a hefty appetite, it serves meals such as the 3,505-calorie rack of St Louis ribs, or the 3,318-calorie Smokin’ Jack Burger.

Each of those contains well over an entire day’s recommended calorie intake, which stands at 2,500 for men and 2,000 for women.

A further ten restaurant chains each recorded averages of more than 1,000 calories per meal.

Among the fast-food chains, an average KFC meal comes in at 987 calories, Subway 763, McDonald’s

‘Problematic for health’

726 and Wimpy 721. Of all the meals assessed, 89 per cent at full-service restaurants and 83 per cent at fast food chains breached the 600-calorie limit for a single meal.

Britain is in the midst of a major public health crisis, with the third highest rates of obesity in Europe.

A recent report by the World Health Organisation revealed that 28 per cent of British adults are obese, compared to a European average of 23 per cent.

The researchers, writing in the British Medical Journal, said the increasing habit of eating out at restaurants is playing a major role.

‘The energy content of a large number of main meals in major UK restaurant chains is excessive, and only a minority meet public health recommendations,’ they say. ‘Although the poor nutritional quality of fast-food meals has been well documented, the energy content of full-service restaurant meals in the UK tends to be higher and is a cause for concern.’

They said 39 per cent of people in Britain eat out at least once a week, up from 25 per cent a decade ago. ‘Several studies suggest that people who eat out of the home more often are at increased risk of weight gain and obesity,’ the researchers said.

‘Meals provided to consumers that are high in energy promote excess energy intake and are problematic for public health.’

Study leader Dr Eric Robinson said: ‘It’s clear what the industry needs to do – they need to act more responsibly and reduce the number of calories that they’re serving.’

Kate Nicholls of UK Hospitality, which represents the restaurant trade, said firms were already offering healthier dishes for customers.

‘Freedom of choice must remain key and it is reasonable for people to treat themselves when dining out, while still controlling their calorific intake,’ she said.

Her comments were reiterated by a spokesman for Hungry Horse, who pointed to its new Live Well range with dishes under 600 calories.