Scottish Daily Mail

STURGEON BATTLES TO SAVE HER SKIN

First Minister under pressure after meetings with Salmond over sexual misconduct claims

- By Michael Blackley Scottish Political Editor

NICOLA Sturgeon was last night fighting to save her job after bomb- shell revelation­s about her secret meetings with Alex Salmond.

The First Minister has been urged to refer herself for official investigat­ion into whether she broke strict Scottish Government rules by failing to report details of a series of meetings with her predecesso­r.

During these meetings, they discussed sexual misconduct allegation­s against Mr Salmond. Opponents have formally demanded Miss Sturgeon reports herself to the independen­t advisers responsibl­e for investigat­ing possible breaches of the ministeria­l code of conduct. It states that ministers must ‘arrange for the basic facts’ of meetings concerning Government business to be recorded.

The First Minister admitted the content of the sexual misconduct investigat­ion, which came after complaints by two civil servants, was discussed at a meeting with Mr Salmond at her home.

The meeting was organised by a senior Government employee who was also present at the talks – but

claimed they related to party business. Miss Sturgeon also disclosed that she only reported her knowledge of the case to Scotland’s most senior civil servant, Permanent Secretary Leslie evans, two months later.

This was shortly before the second in a series of meetings with Mr Salmond, when she told her that he may be about to take legal action against the Government.

relations between the First Minister and Mr Salmond now appear to have plummeted further, as he told supporters that some people are ‘clearly very anxious to remove me now as a political threat’.

The developmen­ts came days after Miss Sturgeon and Mrs evans were forced to apologise after the Government probe into sex claims against Mr Salmond was branded ‘unlawful’ at the Court of Session.

if found guilty of breaking the code she herself signs off, Miss Sturgeon would be under severe pressure to resign.

As she reflected last night on whether to refer herself for investigat­ion, a Scottish Labour source said: ‘The First Minister stalling on this decision hardly portrays confidence in her actions. it would be incredibly serious for the First Minister to have broken the rules that she herself wrote, but her actions have appeared reckless. her Government botched the investigat­ion and this has very serious implicatio­ns for public trust and faith in the system.’

The First Minister yesterday admitted that the first of five discussion­s with Mr Salmond took place in her home in April 2018 and was arranged by her chief of staff Liz Lloyd, a Scottish Government employee. Miss Lloyd was also present. in addition, Mr Salmond was represente­d.

During that meeting, Mr Salmond revealed for the first time he was under investigat­ion by the Scottish Government over sexual misconduct dating back to his time as First Minister and was considerin­g legal action.

Despite this, Miss Sturgeon did not record basic facts of the meeting or include it in her monthly list of engagement­s. The ministeria­l

‘Her actions have appeared reckless’

code of conduct says private offices should ensure all ‘basic facts’ of meetings with people and organisati­ons about Government business should be recorded and included on a monthly list of ministeria­l engagement­s.

in a letter to Miss Sturgeon, Scottish Labour leader richard Leonard said: ‘even if you continue to refuse to accept you have breached the letter of the ministeria­l code, it is self-evident you have breached its spirit. i believe you must now refer yourself to the independen­t advisers.

‘As the First Minister of the Scottish Government, you have a special responsibi­lity to not only repair the damage this case has already done, but also to restore the trust and confidence in public service and public office that is central to our democracy.’

Miss Sturgeon yesterday said she ‘conducted myself appropriat­ely and in line with all the rules’. On Mr Leonard’s request for a probe, she said: ‘i will consider any request that is made, including that one.’

She also said she would ensure all parts of the Scottish Government co-operate with any wider parliament­ary inquiry.

Scottish Tory interim leader Jackson Carlaw said: ‘This astonishin­g admission from the First Minister drives a coach and horses through her assertion earlier this week that she met Alex Salmond in purely a party capacity.

‘if that was the case, what on earth was her number one adviser as First Minister doing there? The First Minister has shown an astounding lapse in judgment on more than one occasion.’

Miss Sturgeon later said: ‘i regret this whole situation. i reflect on all of these things very deeply but i was absolutely clear it would not have been appropriat­e for me to intervene in this investigat­ion and i did not intervene in the investigat­ion.

‘These were meetings in my capacity as party leader. The key thing is i did not intervene to seek to influence this investigat­ion. That is the important point of principle that i think everyone has a right to know.

‘People will reach different conclusion­s on the judgment, i accept that, but i made the judgments i made and all along it was my responsibi­lity to make sure i acted appropriat­ely.’

She claimed her husband, SNP chief executive Peter Murrell, was never informed.

her spokesman also later confirmed that no informatio­n was provided to anyone in the SNP.

Following yesterday’s First Minister’s Questions, a spokesman for Mr Salmond said: ‘Our advice to the Government is that when they are in a hole they should try to stop digging.’

Last night, a Scottish Government spokesman said: ‘The First Minister has said today that she would consider any request made to make a referral to the panel of advisers on the ministeria­l code and the Government would, as always, co-operate with any parliament­ary inquiry.

‘in relation to this and in relation to any requests for documents, the Scottish Government will take account of legal obligation­s in determinin­g the most appropriat­e course of action.’

Comment – Page 16

 ??  ?? Legal victory: Alex Salmond
Legal victory: Alex Salmond

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom