Scottish Daily Mail

PENSIONER REVOLT BREWING

SHOULD OVER-70S KEEP ISOLATING? TWO POWERFUL VOICES, TWO OPPOSING VIEWS

- By Claire Ellicott Political Correspond­ent

Ex-minister in ‘unrest’ warning over lockdown

Hancock fuels confusion about rules for elderly

STOPPING older people leaving their homes when the rest of the country surfaces from lockdown would amount to age discrimina­tion and risk ‘unrest’, a former minister warned yesterday.

Baroness Ros Altmann, 64, said many healthy over-70s would risk going to prison rather than continue isolating if younger generation­s did not have to.

The campaigner said using age-based criteria to lift restrictio­ns would send a message that older people’s lives ‘don’t count in the same way as others’.

The warning came amid confusion over what the current official guidance actually is, with Health Secretary Matt Hancock denying that over-70s were being asked to stay in their houses ‘unless absolutely necessary’ – then directing people to a Government website appearing to suggest just that.

Professor Stephen Powis, national medical director for NHS England, said on Friday that officials are considerin­g whether stricter measures will still apply to the elderly when the lockdown is eased.

With Boris Johnson expected to set out his ‘road map’ for lifting restrictio­ns this week, Baroness Altmann warned of the consequenc­es of singling out the over70s. Speaking to Sky’s Sophy Ridge on Sunday, she said: ‘I think using an age-based criteria is fundamenta­lly wrong and would potentiall­y cost the lives of many people, and risk social unrest.’

The Tory peer said many over 70s have accepted restrictio­ns only ‘because everyone else has got to say they would ‘risk going to prison’ rather than continue to isolate.

She said ‘nobody would dream’ of applying restrictio­ns on the basis of skin colour, despite a higher death rate among black, Asian and minority ethnic people, adding: ‘It’s not okay to discrimina­te on grounds of gender, or obesity, or colour of skin, but everybody is saying, let’s think about somehow discrimina­ting on the basis of age.’

TV presenter Sir Michael Palin, 76, also warned against restrictio­ns on the basis of age, telling the BBC’s Andrew Marr Show: ‘To treat them all as people who have to be sort of kept out of sight is going to be very difficult and very wrong and very unfair.’

Mr Hancock sowed confusion over the guidance yesterday when he tweeted that the over-70s were not classed as the ‘clinically vulnerable’ who should strictly follow social distancing measures.

He then posted a link to official Government guidance which described the over-70s as ‘clinically vulnerable’. It followed a Sunday newspaper report that around 1.8million ‘clinically vulnerable’ over-70s were being advised to stay at home for 12 weeks.

Mr Hancock wrote in response: ‘We have strongly advised all over70s to follow social distancing measures. However, there is no “blanket ban”. The clinically vulnerable, who are advised to stay in lockdown for 12 weeks, emphatical­ly DO NOT include all over-70s.’

The British Medical Associatio­n called for the lockdown to be eased for the healthy over-70s because it is affecting their mental health, saying a ban would be ‘discrimina­tory and unacceptab­le’. ■Latest coronaviru­s video news, views and expert advice at mailplus.co.uk/coronaviru­s

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom