Scottish Daily Mail

The only people cheering will be Auntie’s enemies

- By Stephen Glover

WHO will be the happiest person in the country following the BBC’s admission that a record amount of money was paid in the last financial year to its ‘on-air talent’?

Who will slap his sides and roar his approval at the news that Zoe Ball – host of Radio 2’s Breakfast Show, whose audience is plummeting under her wobbly stewardshi­p – was paid £1.36million in 2019/20?

The answer is Dominic Cummings. How overjoyed he will be to see the Beeb suffering yet another self-inflicted wound!

Boris Johnson’s chief adviser is at the heart of a BBC-hating No10. They want to hack back the Corporatio­n, and ideally eviscerate it. Their ultimate ambition is to abolish the mandatory licence fee, which stands at £157.50 a year.

In the meantime, the plan is to decriminal­ise non-payment of the fee, which Auntie reckons will cost her about £200million. I’ve little doubt No10 will think of other ways of squeezing the Beeb.

Will the great British public cry out in rage as the BBC suffers death by a thousand cuts? Will people march down Whitehall to protest against the slow strangulat­ion of a revered national institutio­n? I don’t think so.

A recent poll commission­ed by the Mail found that two-thirds of respondent­s want the licence fee scrapped, while more than half think the Corporatio­n too politicall­y correct.

SOMeTHINg is happening which I would not have thought possible a decade ago. The BBC is inexorably losing the affection of the British people. In a multi-media world, a compulsory annual charge commands diminishin­g support. Auntie is facing competitio­n from the likes of Netflix and Amazon, which have far deeper pockets.

Yesterday’s publicatio­n of gigantic BBC salaries will be greeted by many as further evidence that it is increasing­ly out of touch with its audience, and has jettisoned the values of public service that once distinguis­hed it.

The French statesman Talleyrand supposedly said, when the Bourbons were restored after the abdication of Napoleon, that they ‘had learnt nothing and forgotten nothing’. So it is with the BBC. Its deadly motto could be ‘Carry on Regardless’.

In the last financial year, the total salary bill for ‘talent’ edged up £1million to £144.6million, while pay for the BBC’s executive committee rose from £4.95million to £5.41million despite endless undertakin­gs that top management would tighten its belt.

It’s true – let’s give credit where it is due – that some male stars have to limp by on slightly smaller salaries than they did a few years ago. Newsreader Huw edwards must now scrape by on £465,000 a year.

On the other hand, several women are being paid more, admittedly often for extra work. In addition to her job asking not especially perceptive questions on Radio 4’s Desert Island Discs, Lauren Laverne has become 6 Music’s lead presenter. Result: an annual salary of £395,000.

So one way and another, the gravy train rolls on, although the distributi­on of funds is now tilted a little more in favour of female stars as the Beeb franticall­y corrects its erstwhile indulgence of men.

even football pundit gary Lineker has agreed to take a cut of 23 per cent on his salary of £1.75million so that next year Zoe Ball may possibly supplant him as the BBC’s highest paid star. Don’t fret too much, though. He has been sweetened with a five-year deal.

I expect he can afford a reduction as he also presents BT Sport’s Champions League coverage, which must bring in a few extra bob. I wonder why Mr Lineker thinks that the astronomic­al sum he receives from the licence fee payer isn’t a proper subject for public debate.

Yesterday he provocativ­ely tweeted: ‘Oh dear. Thoughts are with the haters at this difficult time’. Imagine if a Cabinet Minister receiving a tenth of his salary had tweeted that! Are we no longer permitted to question the vast amounts paid to Mr Lineker out of public money?

How many of these highly paid stars would earn as much if they worked for commercial broadcaste­rs? Very few, I suggest. How bizarre that, in a body supposedly committed to the values of public service, the pay is often more generous than in the private sector.

How grotesque, too, that money should be lavished in ever greater quantities while the BBC is ending free licence fees for the over-75s, excepting only the very poorest pensioners.

AND although it’s true these whopping salaries were set before the scourge of Covid-19, there has been no retrenchme­nt in recent months. As the rest of the country faces pay cuts and job losses, the BBC’s top brass sail on, unrepentan­t and unaware.

That is why they’ll be celebratin­g at No 10. The Corporatio­n goes on behaving exactly as its enemies would wish. And I’m afraid it will find it has fewer friends than it used to.

Can it be saved? New directorge­neral Tim Davie has got off to a good start by reversing the decision to ban the words of Rule, Britannia! and Land of Hope and glory at the Last Night of the Proms. His attempt to crack down on opinionate­d BBC staff pontificat­ing on social media is also welcome.

Reforming this arrogant behemoth will nonetheles­s be an almighty task. I hope Mr Davie succeeds because the best of the BBC is worth fighting for. But it won’t survive in anything like its present form if it continues to carry on regardless.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom