Scottish Daily Mail

THE GREAT SHUTDOWN SHAMBLES

New rules branded ‘clear as mud’ ++ Ministers change confusing guidance ++ Businesses in dark over support plans ++ Warning of legal challenges

- By Michael Blackley Scottish Political Editor

NICOLA Sturgeon faced a furious backlash over her confusing lockdown rules last night as hospitalit­y bosses warned of possible legal action.

From 6pm today, pubs and restaurant­s across the Central Belt will have to shut down for 16 days as part of the latest bid to stop a second wave of coronaviru­s spiralling out of control.

But ministers yesterday introduced a major change on the eve of the new rules coming into force by announcing that ‘licensed cafés’ would be exempt – providing they do not serve any alcohol.

The rules were branded ‘clear as mud’ amid confusion over what qualifies as a café and why restaurant­s are not also being allowed to stay open if they stop alcohol sales.

The Scottish Government was criticised for being unable to provide clear evidence that hospitalit­y premises have been hotspots for transmissi­on of the virus.

And business leaders warned the Scottish Government could be open

to a legal challenge as a result. And firms in the sector are still in the dark about whether they will be eligible for financial support, with ministers delaying an announceme­nt on how they will distribute a £40million fund.

Scottish Tory health spokesman Donald Cameron said: ‘The SNP’s guidance has confused university students, mum and baby groups, and now restaurant­s and cafes. Once again, it’s clear as mud.

‘There is confusion about which cafes and restaurant­s can remain open.

‘The hospitalit­y industry is already facing the chaos of having to close on a moment’s notice. This confusion must be cleared up now.

‘We also need to see the SNP urgently outline what support is available to keep businesses afloat and save jobs. The SNP never puts businesses first. Once again, they’re shut out in the cold.’

Extra measures come into force from 6pm today in the five health board regions of Ayrshire and Arran, Forth Valley, Greater Glasgow and Clyde,

Lanarkshir­e and Lothian, an area that includes 3.4million people or almost two-thirds of Scotland’s population.

As well as pubs and restaurant­s, bingo halls and casinos must close, while nonprofess­ional contact sport and group exercise classes will be banned.

But a late exemption means licensed cafés will be allowed to open in the five areas between 6am and 6pm providing they do not sell alcohol or allow it to be consumed. Licensing laws, however, do not separately categorise cafés, bars and restaurant­s.

Willie Macleod, executive director for Scotland at trade associatio­n UK Hospitalit­y, said: ‘We have to have absolute clarity because we are talking about people’s livelihood­s here and we are also talking about people’s jobs.

‘If these businesses close down for 16 days, there is no money coming in. Where is the equity in a licensed café being able to operate and a licensed restaurant or pub not being allowed to if they dispense with the sale of alcohol temporaril­y?

‘The Government could be open to a legal challenge on the basis of regulation­s not being fair, transparen­t, equitable and proportion­ate.’

Outside the Central Belt, licensed premises will be allowed to open between 6am and 6pm indoors but will not be allowed to sell alcohol. They can serve alcohol outdoors until 10pm.

Tory peer Lord Forsyth, a former Scottish Secretary, yesterday urged hospitalit­y firms to take the Scottish Government to court. He told ITV Border: ‘The legislatio­n under the Public Health Act was intended to deal with people who were infected, or premises which were contaminat­ed.

‘What is happening here is that businesses are being closed who have spent a lot of money and made great efforts to make their businesses safe in line with the Government’s evidence. And I think it is out of proportion.

‘Now, the only way to test that is in the courts and given the devastatin­g impact... I think the trade associatio­ns should test it in the courts.’

LOCKDOWN is now beginning to buckle under the weight of i ts own myriad contradict­ions.

Health Secretary Jeane Freeman yesterday underlined the importance of ‘clarity of communicat­ion’. But her government has presided over a set of regulation­s mired in endless confusion.

Tens of thousands of jobs are on the line as a result of the SNP’s heavy-handed hospitalit­y crackdown. Cafés which sold alcohol were initially forbidden to operate – but can now open if they don’t sell it.

Bizarrely, the question of how to define a ‘café’ is now a matter of debate.

As for pubs, in much of Scotland they are being forced into closure unless they can convert to takeaways.

But why can’t they remain open by serving only food and coffee – which many of them already provide? Where and when businesses might be allowed to open relies on their location. The toughest restrictio­ns are reserved for the Central Belt, affecting more than three million people.

Even National Clinical Director Jason Leitch admitted he ‘can’t keep up with all the regulation and advice’.

These are the strange inconsiste­ncies generated by this ill-conceived clampdown. And they may have to be settled in court cases, as some hospitalit­y businesses consider legal action against government.

It’s not even clear why ministers have targeted pubs and restaurant­s – there’s scant evidence that they are driving the surge in Covid-19 cases.

Truly, this is chaotic, fag-packet pandemic management by ministers and public health officials devising policy on the hoof.

Is it any wonder that trust in the Scottish Government has fallen under Nicola Sturgeon, according to a new survey?

With so much confusion, public confidence is bound to diminish rapidly in the coming weeks.

Increasing­ly, it seems the rationale for these sweeping changes to our everyday lives is at the very least dubious.

A major University of Edinburgh study has found strict lockdowns may add to the coronaviru­s death toll.

While they cut demand on intensive care units, they could prolong the epidemic, resulting in more deaths long-term.

And more than 12,000 scientists and medics have signed a petition lobbying the Government to abandon damaging lockdown restrictio­ns.

The Great Barrington Declaratio­n was published this week, calling for young people to be allowed to return to life as normal, while the elderly and most vulnerable are given ‘focused protection’.

Inflicting crippling bouts of paralysis on an economy that hasn’t had time to recover from the first phase of lockdown imposed in March is hugely counterpro­ductive.

But it also smacks of a strategy that is losing direction, devised by experts who are fast beginning to lose credibilit­y.

Ministers and indeed opposition parties should be questionin­g the scientific advice that has led to the absurditie­s now being foisted upon us.

Instead they’ve cravenly submitted to them – guided, no doubt, by the best of intentions. But they are steering us towards even greater disaster.

We know much more about Covid-19 than we did in March, when it was necessary to force the UK into full lockdown.

Since then, showing resilience and determinat­ion, we’ve adapted to the altered life we must lead to combat the virus. Now we’re being forced to take a backward step that risks reducing morale – and delivering a massive blow to the economy. The all-consuming battle against Covid means the NHS, in survival mode, is missing other deadly conditions.

Our Government ministers must be persuaded that muddled short-termism is no way to tackle the pandemic.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom