Scottish Daily Mail

THE AMERICAN SPIN DOCTOR

-

JASON KNAUF joined the royals in 2014, having acted as a ‘crisis management expert’ at the Royal Bank of Scotland. The 36year-old American, who completed his master’s at the London School of Economics, served as communicat­ions secretary to the ‘Fab Four’ of William, Kate, Harry and Meghan before the Cambridges and Sussexes created separate offices in March 2019. Mr Knauf now heads William and Kate’s charitable foundation.

member of staff. Mr Knauf makes clear in his email, as reported by The Times, that he was also concerned about the couple’s hugely experience­d deputy private secretary, Samantha Cohen. She had worked for the Queen for more than 20 years and was personally persuaded by the monarch to stay on and help the couple navigate their first few years of royal life.

He indicated that she was experienci­ng extreme stress and said: ‘I questioned if the Household policy on bullying and harassment applies to principals [the term used to refer to a member of the royal family].’

One source tells me wryly, with an eye to Meghan’s much-hyped championin­g of female empowermen­t: ‘Note that everyone concerned was a woman.’

Another adds: ‘Sam always made clear that it was like working for a couple of teenagers. They were impossible and pushed her to the limit. She was miserable.’

The Times also makes reference to an incident during the couple’s tour to Australia, New Zealand, Fiji and Tonga in 2018, which was a particular­ly difficult one for all concerned, Meghan included. She was, of course, pregnant at the time.

The newspaper reports how Meghan cut short a visit to a market in Fiji because she was concerned about the presence of a UN organisati­on promoting women, with which she had worked before and made clear she no longer wished to have anything to do with.

At the time officials had suggested that it was because it was humid and the crowd was oppressive in the market.

I was there at the time and witnessed Meghan turn and ‘hiss’ at a member of her entourage, clearly incandesce­nt with rage about something, and demand to leave.

I later saw that same – female – highly distressed member of staff sitting in an official car, with tears running down her face. Our eyes met and she lowered hers, humiliatio­n etched on her features.

At the time I was unable to document anything as I couldn’t conclusive­ly link the two incidents together, despite my suspicions. I have subsequent­ly found out from other sources that my instincts were right.

It should be stressed that lawyers for the duchess said she met other leaders from UN Women later on the tour and denied she left for the reason alleged.

So why has this all come out now, you might ask?

The Times makes clear that these aides have ‘hit back’ before Meghan’s bombshell

‘Fed up with the sheer hypocrisy’

interview with Oprah Winfrey this Sunday.

The newspaper says it was approached by sources because they felt ‘only a partial version had emerged of Meghan’s two years as a working member of the royal family and they wished to tell their side’.

They were also concerned at how such matters were handled by the palace.

One source put it more succinctly to me yesterday. ‘Those concerned are fed up with the sheer hypocrisy of it all. The suggestion that they [the Sussexes] were being bullied and forced out when others were experienci­ng that very treatment at their hands!’ exclaimed the source.

Another insider told me they believed some staff had even sought psychologi­cal therapy over their experience­s – something that Harry, who moved the nation when he revealed how he had himself sought profession­al help to cope with the emotional fallout over his mother’s death and has long campaigned on mental health issues, should know all about.

‘People have been broken by this, genuinely so. Absolutely traumatise­d,’ I am told.

Lawyers for the duchess say she wished to fit in and be accepted and had left her life in North America to commit to her new role. What a sad, sorry mess. The irony, another source says, is that no one wanted a battle. But the Sussexes have waged this war and enough is enough.

Those aides who have broken the royal omerta say they refuse to sit by and watch Harry and Meghan’s ‘duplicitou­s’ behaviour, especially when ‘good people and brilliant profession­als’ are having their reputation­s unfairly traduced. One source warns: ‘The royals cannot fight back. “Never complain, never explain.” But they can.’

A spokesman for the Sussexes has told The Times that they are the victims of a ‘calculated smear campaign based on misleading and harmful informatio­n’.

They have said the duchess is ‘saddened by this latest attack on her character, particular­ly as someone who has been the target of bullying herself and is deeply committed to supporting those who have experience­d pain and trauma.’

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom