Scottish Daily Mail

Patients must be seen face-to-face

-

SO PROFESSOR Martin Marshall, chairman of the Royal College of GPs, wants a 50-50 split between face-toface and remote appointmen­ts. I hope that his GPs will accept an equivalent 50 per cent deduction in their wages for just sitting at their desks drinking tea while talking into a computer. Despite mind-boggling sums being poured into the NHS, we are seeing a reduction in services. I can remember when doctors came to visit you at home. Not any more. A friend of mine had an appointmen­t with a physiother­apist but was told to go home so that a consultati­on could be given over the phone. Friends who live in France tell me of the prompt treatment they receive. I feel it’s time for a complete overhaul. The NHS should be saving us, not the other way round.

CLIFF BROWN, Bolton, Lancs.

BRITAIN has always been so proud of its NHS but now, with face-to-face GP consultati­ons under threat and the proposal that half of them are replaced by virtual appointmen­ts, one wonders: for how long? For a GP to get a proper understand­ing of patients’ symptoms and determine the appropriat­e treatment, face-to-face contacts play a vital role. Zoom consultati­ons must not be seen as the alternativ­e to seeing a patient in person. SHAFICK EMMAMBOKUS,

Cranford, Middlesex.

AS THE rest of the UK opens up after July 19, then surely there is no legal or medical reason that we cannot see a GP face-to-face. Or will they cling on to the belief that they are providing an adequate service to their patients via a telephone call? It’s about time the PM or new Health Secretary told GPs to get back to work like the rest of the NHS.

COLIN McLEOD, Cambridge.

GENERAL practition­ers need reminding they are employed by the NHS and are not running private clinics. Covid is being used as a convenient excuse for patients to be refused face-to-face consultati­ons which, prior to the pandemic, were the norm. A two to three-minute telephone call is fraught with danger; not for the GP but the patient. It is a situation that cannot be allowed to develop. It may be a benefit for doctors, but certainly not for those in need. PETER RICKABY, Selby, North Yorkshire.

 ??  ?? Remote chance: Visits to the doctor in person are under threat
Remote chance: Visits to the doctor in person are under threat

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom