Canterbury wails! They’ve cancelled Chaucer
FOR more than seven centuries he has been venerated as the father of English literature.
Now, however, Geoffrey Chaucer has fallen victim to 21st century wokery.
The author of The Canterbury Tales has come under withering attack in a specialist journal from academics who have cast him as racist, an anti-Semite and a rapist.
The portrayal has divided scholars and prompted one former Cambridge don to resign from the publication’s board in disgust at the ‘grotesque caricature’.
The Chaucer Review published a series of articles edited by two academics, Nicole Sidhu and Samantha Katz Seal, entitled ‘New Feminist Approaches to Chaucer’.
Suggesting the time may have come ‘for feminists to move past Chaucer’, they wrote: ‘He is a rapist, a racist, an anti-Semite; he speaks for a world in which the privileges of the male...are an inalienable aspect of human existence.’
Claims of anti-Semitism and racism arise from the prioress in The Canterbury Tales telling of Jews drinking blood in a ritual – but there is no evidence this passage in a satirical tale represents Chaucer’s own views. The claim of rape is based on a 14th century legal document in which a woman called Cecily Chaumpaigne agreed to release Chaucer from all actions relating to ‘De raptu meo’.
While some interpret this as referring to rape, others point out the Latin term ‘raptus’ could also refer to abduction.
The article has prompted Jill Mann, former professor of Medieval and Renaissance English at Cambridge University, to quit the board of The Chaucer Review. In a letter to the Times Literary Supplement, she said the depiction of Chaucer was a ‘self-righteous assertion’.