Scottish Daily Mail

Ignore the killjoys — let’s have a right royal knees-up!

- LITTLEJOHN richard.littlejohn@dailymail.co.uk

THIS work/life balance business is getting completely out of hand. One of my ladies, who I’ve agreed can remain nameless, writes from Brentwood, Essex. On a recent visit to a hair salon, she found herself in the next chair to a woman with a laptop, mobile phone and notepad. For three hours, while enjoying a number of ‘treatments’, the woman tapped away and gabbled into her mobile, obviously in some kind of Zoom wossname. She was so engrossed that she never once spoke to her stylist. Well, they do say the only way is Essex. But it certainly brings a whole new meaning to WFH: Working From Hairdresse­rs!

WITHIN about five minutes of the first lockdown coming into force, councils all over Britain started closing roads with gay abandon and without warning.

Anti-car fanatics hijacked the Covid crisis to further their own ‘green’ agenda. Residents woke up to find their streets had been turned into no-go areas overnight.

Cranes trundled in, dumping giant concrete planters to seal off access to motor vehicles. Metal barriers, bollards and numberplat­e recognitio­n cameras were installed to enforce the ban.

No one voted for this policy. Nobody was consulted. No notice was given. The socalled low Traffic Neighbourh­oods were simply imposed on people by officials.

The folly of this madcap scheme soon became apparent, with the emergency services experienci­ng severe delays to response times and bus companies complainin­g that their routes were being disrupted.

Tradesmen, such as builders and plumbers, were prevented from getting to work. Journey times, especially for the disabled, increased significan­tly. Promoted as a measure to help the environmen­t, these lTNs simply forced traffic on to main roads, increasing congestion and pollution.

A cursory, preliminar­y study would have pointed up these problems. But the left-wing, anti-motorist zealots who infest Britain’s Town Halls simply weren’t interested. Ideology took precedence, and to hell with the consequenc­es.

Yet in all other circumstan­ces, these self-same council jobsworths are in thrall to the suffocatin­g, tick-box elf’n’safety culture.

The run-up to the Platinum Jubilee celebratio­ns has given them an excuse to go into red tape overdrive. If you want to hold a street party to mark Her Maj’s magnificen­t 70 years on the throne, these killjoys will make you jump through all kinds of hoops.

organisers have had endless obstacles thrown in their way by petty bureaucrat­s. Councils are insisting on extensive risk assessment­s before they will give consent to close roads for the day.

Michael Gove, the levelling Up minister, has been forced to write to local authoritie­s telling them to ease off after a raft of ludicrous rules came to light. The Mail on Sunday revealed that party planners in Bournemout­h were refused permission to hang bunting from lamp posts because ‘they were not designed for this purpose’.

They were also told they had to take out a £5 million public liability insurance policy.

In Hemel Hempstead, Herts, pensioner Gloria odell was sent a 23-page applicatio­n form, demanding she carried out everything from a Covid risk assessment to a severe weather management plan. The council also wanted her to draw up a ‘counter-terrorism plan’.

Not surprising­ly, Gloria abandoned plans to hold a party for the 15 houses in her street, which was to have raised money for a local hospice. Another triumph for the prodnose Guardianis­tas.

In the Govester’s own Surrey Heath constituen­cy, officials are insisting on a ‘slip, trip and fall hazards’ assessment and specifying that only reusable plastic plates and cups can be used.

They, too, want to know what arrangemen­ts organisers have for dealing with ‘extreme weather’. Are they expecting a tornado to strike Surrey Heath in June?

The daft demand for organisers to provide detailed contingenc­y plans for severe weather is standard pretty much everywhere.

Hasn’t anyone told these pernickety elf’n’safety commissars that in Hertford, Hereford and Hampshire hurricanes hardly ever happen?

Funnily enough, the British have always managed to cope with summer showers. It’s not uncommon for invitation­s to barbecues and street parties to feature the age-old proviso: If wet, in village hall. In many cases, councils making these unreasonab­le demands are exceding their statutory powers.

HOW many more times? Give anyone a modicum of authority and they will always, always abuse it. organising a street party should be fairly straightfo­rward. Gove’s department has put out guidance busting many of the myths perpetrate­d by officials.

For instance, you don’t need a music licence and nor are you required to pay a fee for temporary road closures, provided you obtain the go-ahead from the relevant highways authority. There is absolutely no requiremen­t to purchase expensive public liability insurance, either.

The bureaucrat­s behind all this red tape are simply creating work to justify their own existence. For the past 30-odd years this column has been documentin­g the explosion of the elf’n’safety industry, compounded by the spiv lawyers who advertise on daytime TV, promising com-pen-say-shun for any minor inconvenie­nce or broken fingernail.

They have created a crazy, riskaverse society which sees calamity lurking around every corner and reached its nadir during Covid.

I often wonder what the Queen’s generation, who faced real danger daily during the war, make of this cry-baby, cotton-wool culture.

To be honest, I don’t recall any of this palaver during the Silver Jubilee celebratio­ns. I’ve been looking back at pictures of street parties from 1977 and there’s not a hi-viz jacket or hard hat in sight.

So if you are holding a street party and you encounter unwarrante­d interferen­ce from a council clipboard commissar, just tell them to shove off.

After Covid threw a spanner into the last couple of summers, we’re all due a right royal knees-up.

And the good news is that if you now find yourself living in a low Traffic Neighbourh­ood, at least you won’t have to apply for permission to close the road . . .

 ?? ??
 ?? ?? 1977
1977
 ?? ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom