Scottish Daily Mail

Smart m-ways ARE safe, says minister

- By David Churchill Chief Political Correspond­ent

THE Transport Secretary has controvers­ially described smart motorways as ‘safe’, raising fears ministers will try to justify building more.

Mark Harper’s comments contradict those made by Rishi Sunak during the Tory leadership race this summer, when he branded the roads ‘unsafe’.

The Prime Minister has since been accused of betraying grieving relatives of drivers killed on the roads after not acting on his pledge for a ‘comprehens­ive ban’ on new smart motorways.

The roads have their hard shoulder removed and turned into another live lane, meaning drivers can be marooned in live traffic and hit from behind. In his first newspaper interview since taking the role,

‘We need to listen to drivers’

Mr Harper said ministers will wait for five years of safety data before deciding whether to scrap them.

But because some didn’t open until the end of last year, it means a decision may not be made until 2026. Pressed on whether he thought they were safe, he said: ‘If you look at the data collected so far, that would suggest they are safe.’

Claire Mercer, whose husband Jason was killed on a smart motorway in 2019, said: ‘These roads are exactly the opposite of safe. If you had to stop on a smart motorway would you rather do it on a hard shoulder or in a live lane of traffic. That’s what it comes down to, regardless of the data.’

In the summer Mr Sunak said: ‘Smart motorways are unpopular because they are unsafe. We need to listen to drivers and stop with the pursuit of policies that go against common sense.’

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom