Now top cop insists racism exists across society… not just the police
Speaking up ‘is right thing to do’
RACISM is endemic in society, affecting trade unions, political parties and the media, Scotland’s police chief has said – days after branding his own force institutionally racist.
Chief Constable Sir Iain Livingstone, who said institutional racism, sexism and misogyny were problems for Police Scotland, has vowed to crack down on ‘canteen culture’ and offensive banter.
He has now challenged other organisations to examine their own records on discrimination, claiming they ‘also have some of these elements’.
Sir Iain’s shock declaration of institutional racism in policing – which he made at a public board meeting of the Scottish
‘He has damaged the reputation of officers’
Police Authority last month – triggered a backlash from rank-and-file officers.
One former senior officer has branded Sir Iain a ‘coward’ for raising the issue shortly before his retirement in August and leaving his successor, who has not yet been chosen, to tackle the fallout.
Bosses at the Scottish Police Federation (SPF), representing rank-and-file officers, have accused him of having ‘damaged the reputation’ of policing.
But Sir Iain defended his comments and accused his critics of misinterpreting the remarks, insisting that they were intended as an ‘accelerator to make the changes we wish to make’.
He sparked controversy on May 25 when he announced a review of Police Scotland had found instances of racism, sexism and homophobia. He said: ‘Publicly acknowledging that these institutional issues exist in our organisation is essential to our absolute commitment to championing equality and becoming an anti-racist service.’
In an interview with the Sunday Times, Sir Iain said: ‘I would also stress it is important not to see this just as a police issue. Policing is reflective of society.
‘I genuinely put the challenge out to political parties, the trade unions, private sector trade associations and the media. If they reflect society, then they also have some of these elements’. He added: ‘I’m saying this because it is the right thing to do and the right time to do it. It will allow the organisation to go forward.’
Sir Iain, 56, said ‘minority staff associations and women within the service’ had ‘really welcomed’ his remarks ‘because it then allows progress to be made’.
He said he did not want to suggest that Scottish people were racist, only that long-standing historical attitudes, whether based on race, religion or sex, are still embedded in society. He insisted he had made ‘a positive statement of recognition, so it should actually act as an accelerator to make the changes we wish to make’.
The SPF, representing around 16,600 officers, has attacked Sir Iain directly on its website, accusing him of having ‘damaged the reputation’ of officers and civilian staff. Its general secretary, David Kennedy, said that ‘no matter how much context you gave and qualifications you made, or how you tried to reassure us that you were not labelling individual police officers as racist, sexist, misogynistic or discriminatory, that is how it was interpreted by many within and outwith the service’.
Former Police Scotland temporary superintendent Brian Cook said Sir Iain is an ‘utter disgrace’, and a ‘coward who throws his force under a bus and then runs away into cosy retirement’.
THE search of Nicola Sturgeon’s home as part of the police fraud probe was ‘proportionate and necessary’, Chief Constable Sir Iain Livingstone has said.
A security tent was erected on the lawn outside the house, a move that was seen by some SNP figures as excessive and highly damaging as the images were seen around the world – and many viewers would normally associate the use of a tent with a murder inquiry.
Sir Iain told the Sunday Times he was satisfied the processes put in place during the Operation Branchform probe into SNP finances were ‘proportionate and necessary’.
Asked if he had approved the decision to erect the tent, Sir Iain said: ‘I was aware of it and was supportive of it because I knew the circumstances and the rationale for utilising it, and part of it was to protect rights of individuals.’