As com­muters face the on-go­ing bat­tle of nav­i­gat­ing the Queens­berry Cross­ing, Rosie Morton asks why the ‘old’ Forth Road Bridge re­mains bliss­fully free of stressed com­muters

Scottish Field - - CONTENTS -

The new Queens­ferry Cross­ing has done lit­tle to al­le­vi­ate con­ges­tion

Ev­ery day, sev­eral of my col­leagues at Scot­tish Field drive across the Queens­ferry Cross­ing from ru­ral Fife. It is a uniquely stress­ful ex­is­tence. From mid-af­ter­noon on­wards they fever­ishly check the sta­tus of the bridge. If all is well, they will be home in time to tuck the chil­dren into bed. If things go awry, they can sit in their cars wait­ing to get over the bridge for lit­er­ally hours. And things go awry far more often than non-com­muters could ever sus­pect. It has long been thus, but now com­muters no longer just have to bear the in­jury of sit­ting in traf­fic as they at­tempt to cross the Forth, they also have to en­dure the added in­sult of gaz­ing across at the vir­tu­ally empty – but use­able – old bridge. Per­haps it is just me, but I find it hard to re­sist look­ing long­ingly at the now-re­tired Forth Road Bridge where the quiet roads are bliss­fully free of the 65,000 ve­hi­cles which used to carry stressed com­muters across it each day. The Forth Road Bridge’s motto, ‘Guid Pas­sage’, now hold­ing an un­bear­able irony, has never been so true. The ques­tion begs to be asked, though: why? Why, when the Forth Road Bridge is still ap­par­ently safe to use for

years to come, is it not be­ing em­ployed to ease at least some of the traf­fic? Fig­ures sug­gest that south­bound wait­ing times have only im­proved by five min­utes since the new bridge opened, while rush hour cross­ing times head­ing north­bound have not im­proved at all. Surely, the per­fect so­lu­tion would be to open the old bridge to pre­vail­ing traf­fic head­ing into Ed­in­burgh in the morn­ing and out of it in the evening? Or how about us­ing the old bridge while de­vot­ing some of the ca­pac­ity of the Queens­ferry Cross­ing to traf­fic which is seek­ing to head to the M8 or the by­pass and has no de­sire to come into Ed­in­burgh at all? This would un­doubt­edly ease some of the traf­fic flow at a stroke. Of course, there were con­cerns that the Forth Road Bridge would no longer sup­port high-sided, heavy goods ve­hi­cles, and re­pair­ing the ex­ten­sive cor­ro­sion of the ca­bles on the old bridge is not eco­nom­i­cally vi­able – it would take around seven to nine years to com­plete, and clos­ing it for that length of time would cost busi­nesses be­tween £0.54 and £1.3 bil­lion. A few years ago, the clo­sure of just a sin­gle car­riage­way on the Forth Road Bridge cost the econ­omy £650,000 a day. But imag­ine, then, what the eco­nomic gain would be if both bridges were open. As it stands, only pub­lic trans­port, mo­tor­cy­clists, pedes­tri­ans and cy­clists can use the bridge. Why is it still closed to cars? While the al­most de­serted 2.5 kilo­me­tre stretch re­mains, it is hard to see the new Queens­ferry ar­rival as an im­prove­ment on the daily grid­lock faced by com­mut­ing Fifers. As it stands, it is ridicu­lously dif­fi­cult to di­vert traf­fic across the old bridge should the new bridge be closed for any rea­son. It’s only a mat­ter of time be­fore an ac­ci­dent closes the new bridge and drivers are left to sit in a traf­fic jam while star­ing at the empty old bridge. In­sult is added to in­jury if we look across the pond, where ex­am­ples of con­ges­tion be­ing suc­cess­fully re­duced are com­mon­place. From ex­pe­ri­ence, ev­ery­thing is in per­fect mo­tion in Mon­treal and the stress of rush hour is more or less re­moved. Driv­ing from Laval into Mon­treal, the flow of lanes is re­versed, al­low­ing more traf­fic in and out of the city at peak times. Ad­mit­tedly, a few horns still blast and some tense mo­ments re­main. But, for the most part, the num­ber of an­gry red faces and white knuck­les are much di­min­ished. It is a sys­tem that could eas­ily have been mim­icked on the Queens­ferry cross­ing, but hasn’t been. It seems al­most com­i­cal that a city of over 1.7 mil­lion peo­ple can man­age rush hour bet­ter than Ed­in­burgh, a city of less than 500,000. Que­beck­ers have mim­icked this traf­fic man­age­ment sys­tem across their Vic­to­ria, Jac­ques Cartier and Que­bec Bridges. So whether they are hur­ry­ing to reach a 9am meet­ing in town, or are rac­ing home to be in time for their favourite tele­vi­sion drama, it is plain sail­ing. The same can be seen across the globe. The iconic Golden Gate Bridge, for ex­am­ple, would un­doubt­edly be the epit­ome of in­tol­er­a­ble con­ges­tion if it weren’t for their re­versible lane sys­tem. Two of the six lanes con­nect­ing San Fran­cisco and Marin County are open to south­bound traf­fic in the morn­ing, then north­bound traf­fic in the evening. Sim­i­lar set ups can be seen in Van­cou­ver, Syd­ney, New Zealand, and even in other parts of the UK such as Birm­ing­ham, Sh­effield and Ply­mouth. So why are we un­able to fol­low suit? The Queens­ferry Cross­ing is a re­mark­able feat of en­gi­neer­ing, but as it stands we have spent £1.3bn with­out mak­ing the jour­ney to work ap­pre­cia­bly bet­ter for le­gions of com­muters. The worst thing is, it doesn’t have to be this way.

minute“Rush hour wait­ing times have only im­proved by five s

Above: The new Queens­ferry Cross­ing (on the right) over the Firth of Forth with the older Forth Road Bridge (on the left) and the iconic Forth Rail Bridge (far left).

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from UK

© PressReader. All rights reserved.