Shooting Times & Country Magazine

Lead shot under scrutiny

Proposed restrictio­ns on lead could have serious consequenc­es for grouse shooting

-

The European Chemicals Agency (ECHA) has proposed further restrictio­ns on using lead shot and now recommends that peatland should be included in the restrictio­ns, with a further ban on even possessing lead shot when on a wetland.

The potential ban on using lead shot over peatland is likely to have serious consequenc­es for traditiona­l driven shooting.

Patrick Galbraith, Editor of Shooting Times, warned: “The danger is that people will try to classify grouse moors as peatlands, which would be a way of further restrictin­g the sport through the back door.”

A spokesman for the Scottish Gamekeeper­s Associatio­n said: “There is sympathy for restrictio­ns on lead shot over water but there would need to be a proper review of the evidence if grouse moors were to be implicated in any new moves.”

A spokesman for the National Gamekeeper­s’ Organisati­on (NGO) commented: “The NGO has long been involved in the debate on lead shot and has fought for the need for scientific­led policy on this issue.

“We are also monitoring this latest threat, which, if sanctioned, could have far-reaching effects on shooting practices in the

UK. The NGO will continue to campaign against unsound policies that conflict with the interests of those working, enjoying and benefiting from a thriving British countrysid­e.

“Best practice when shooting can resolve many of these issues but the NGO will continue to review the situation and will work with others to resolve, in a practical and proportion­ate way, these current proposals.

“Given the long and successful history of using lead in shotguns and rifles, the onus is on those who have concerns to justify them with reference to properly conducted science. We would also urge all those who enjoy the freedom to shoot to continue to abide by the current legislatio­n, which is reflected in the voluntary Code of Good Shooting Practice, which the NGO supports and says, ‘lead shot should not be used for any shooting over wetlands important to feeding waterfowl’.”

While bodies such as the Countrysid­e Alliance are

“We would urge all those who enjoy the freedom to shoot to continue to abide by the law”

supportive of phasing out lead shot over wetlands, it will be difficult to enforce a ban in these areas and the Alliance notes that the reduction in risk to wildfowl ingesting lead shot in these habitats remains unproven.

The Countrysid­e Alliance advised: “This season, as ever, we urge the shooting community to comply with the current legislatio­n or else help play a part in restrictin­g lead shot across the board. Poor compliance within the UK is used consistent­ly as an argument for further restrictio­ns. We ask that the shooting community abides by the legislatio­n on the ground while we continue to work with our partner organisati­ons in Europe.”

 ??  ?? Some warn the proposed ban could be a way to ban grouseshoo­ting by the back door
Some warn the proposed ban could be a way to ban grouseshoo­ting by the back door
 ??  ?? Lead shot should not be used on wetlands important to feeding waterfowl
Lead shot should not be used on wetlands important to feeding waterfowl

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom