BBC Sky at Night Magazine

Create timelapse star trails

Catch breathtaki­ng stills and videos that show the Earth’s spin

-

One of the most beautiful and rewarding subjects for astrophoto­graphy are star trails. You can create such an image by shooting a long-exposure photograph that captures the apparent movement of the stars. But it’s not actually the stars that are moving – the appearance of movement is caused by the Earth spinning on its own axis, taking 23 hours 56 minutes and four seconds to complete one full rotation.

If you study the movement of the stars, you’ll notice that they rotate around the celestial poles. In the northern hemisphere, stars appear to move anticlockw­ise around the north celestial pole, which is currently within 1° of Polaris. The exact locations of the celestial poles are slowly but constantly changing due to precession – the ‘wobble’ caused by Earth’s rotational axis being tilted at 23.5°. The celestial poles both follow a circular path that takes almost 26,000 years to complete, so those of us in the northern hemisphere are lucky to be here when Polaris is so near.

It’s important to know the location of the celestial pole when you’re deciding how to frame your images of star trails, especially if you want to include it in your photo. If you look at a star-trail image, you’ll notice that the further away from the celestial pole a star lies, the greater the distance it appears to move within the shot. This leads to the beautiful concentric circular patterns that are carved across the sky.

Where to look

Your latitude is what determines the exact position of Polaris in the sky and therefore the location of the celestial pole. If you’re standing at the North Pole, Polaris would be directly above you. If, however, you’re in London, which lies at a latitude of approximat­ely 51°N, then Polaris would be 51° above the horizon.

Producing star-trail images is relatively straightfo­rward and you only need basic equipment to do it. There are two methods: the first is to simply set your camera to take one long, continuous exposure. The downside of this method is that unless you’re under incredibly dark skies, your final image will suffer from the effects of light pollution. Also any fainter stars in your image will be completely washed out.

A better method is to stack lots of shorter-exposure photograph­s together using free software, such as StarStaX. This sort of software is simple to use

 ??  ?? A stationary object in the foreground provides a great contrast to apparent motion of the stars
A stationary object in the foreground provides a great contrast to apparent motion of the stars

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom