BBC Sky at Night Magazine

Planetary nebulae made pretty by debris

Dying stars wrap themselves with their own detritus, and it’s beautiful

- Chris Lintott was reading… Fallback in Bipolar Planetary Nebulae by Willem A Baan et al. Read it online at: https://arxiv.org/abs/2107.14269

One of the first objects I looked at through a telescope was the Ring Nebula. There was something about the neatly coloured doughnut that appealed, though I soon found that seeing more than a smudge is difficult – even through a large telescope. In images, though, especially those that flowed from the Hubble Space Telescope, the complexity of these fragile objects became obvious.

In addition to rings, there are planetary nebulae that look like egg timers, nebulae shaped like butterfly wings and even a singular object that goes by the name of the Red Rectangle. Close up, there are substructu­res – ribs, stripes and more – and it’s these smaller scale features that this month’s paper sets out to explain. Its authors concentrat­e on hourglass-shaped nebulae, several of which seem to display faint filaments that the paper describes as a ‘spiderweb’ structure.

The Hubble image of the Matryoshka Nebula (right) shows how complicate­d such objects can be. A bright central source sits in the middle of the hourglass, the sides of which seem made of almost-transparen­t gossamer, with a texture that hints at unresolved structure. Material is believed to be flowing away from the central source and the whole thing sits in a larger, oval nebula consisting of long, curving arcs of glowing cooler gas. Whatever is sculpting these structures, it produces symmetry, both north-south through the hourglass lobes and east-west in the spiderweb structure.

So what’s going on? The basics we know; planetary nebulae such as this are formed during the later stages of a star’s life (the Sun, for example) as instabilit­y at the core causes the outer layers of the star to be shed. As a result, the beauty of these objects is transitory; something like the Ring Nebula will exist for only a few tens of thousands of years. As the stellar wind pushes material away from the star, it can excite and interact with surroundin­g material, creating the structures we see.

The key insight of the model in the paper, though, is that the planetary nebulae we see today don’t exist in a pristine environmen­t. The process of atmosphere loss is erratic and takes time, so the star exists surrounded by its own debris. Some of this material, the authors say, must be falling back onto the star and their detection of what seems to be an accretion disc around the central source suggests that there is enough material to make a difference.

“In images, especially those that flowed from the Hubble Space Telescope, the beauty and complexity of these fragile objects became obvious”

More than meets the eye

When gas is moving, it can become shocked and excited, and it seems like this process can weave the spiderweb structures that we observe. If the inside of the hourglass is a region where material flows outwards, its edge is a place where material can flow back. This process is likely to be somewhat chaotic and what appeared to be a precious, permanent jewel in the sky is revealed to be a dramatical­ly dynamic system, as changeable as the pattern of waves on the surface of the sea.

 ??  ?? Hubble images of the Matryoshka Nebula in different wavelength­s reveal the extent of its surroundin­g structure. The arrows (right) indicate spiderweb arcs 10 arcseconds
Hubble images of the Matryoshka Nebula in different wavelength­s reveal the extent of its surroundin­g structure. The arrows (right) indicate spiderweb arcs 10 arcseconds
 ??  ?? Prof Chris Lintott is an astrophysi­cist and co-presenter on The Sky at Night
Prof Chris Lintott is an astrophysi­cist and co-presenter on The Sky at Night

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom