Questions to be answered after loss of ancient tree

MORE than three weeks have now passed since the destruction of a 160-yearold giant redwood tree near a housing development site in Penllergaer.

The incident was reported in this paper on December 4, where it was also reported that further destruction of trees had also taken place on the development site, which is that of the former council offices.

It was also reported by the Evening Post that Mark Thomas, Swansea Council cabinet member for environment and infrastructure management, said: “We take the destruction of these trees very seriously and . . . will be looking at what action can be taken.”

He also said: “The complaints about the removal of trees relates to land outside of the development site and as such has not been given any form of approval.”

With that said, nothing has yet happened, and I fear that nothing meaningful is likely to happen that will properly address this act.

I believe the whole incident begs a number of questions, including why any trees were felled outside the development site.

Has developer Enzo Homes acted on the belief that there already exists a presumption that planning permission would be granted for this other site?

If so, was the council informed by Enzo Homes that the site clearance was starting?

Did Enzo Homes have permission from the landowner to carry out such works?

If there is a presumption for planning on the site, or if there is not, has the council been in discussion with interested parties?

DAVE HARRIS Penllergaer