Euston suburban semi-fast trains
Andrew James takes a look at the suburban trains running between London (Euston) and Watford Junction and the performances of the variety of steam motive power used on these trains over the years.
Andrew James takes a look at the suburban trains running between London (Euston) and Watford Junction and the performances of the variety of steam motive power used on these trains over the years.
This is an arena where there have been a few tantalising glances in print, but not quite enough to form a body of evidence that can be assessed and measured. It was no less an authority than O S Nock who gave details of his daily journeys on the 8.53am Watford Junction to Euston service during the early/mid-1930s. Initially this represented the old order in the form of former London & North Western Railway ‘Precursor’ and ‘George the Fifth’ 4-4-0s and ‘Prince of Wales’ 4-6-0 class locomotives that ran well enough, reaching speeds in the midto high seventies in the twilight of their lives. Unfortunately, O S Nock only gives the gross load on his logs, and not the tare weight, and therefore due to the markedly different rolling stock configurations in this era it is very difficult to tell just how many coaches there are at the drawbar. One exploit that he did refer to on a number of occasions in his numerous books and articles was when the new breed came on stream in the form of the LMS Fowler 2-6-4 tank engines.
On 14 February 1935, Fowler 2-6-4T No 2387, with a six consist of 168 tons tare/185 tons gross, ran the 17½ miles between Watford Junction and Euston in 19 minutes. A maximum speed of 83½mph was attained at Milepost 7, which was at the foot of the 1 in 339 down grades, with the run subsequently ‘checked’ beyond Camden. A power estimate (carried out on an Excel
spreadsheet) reveals that between Bushey and Willesden Junction the Fowler tank was developing around 420/900 equivalent drawbar horsepower (edhp)/indicated horsepower (ihp). If working at the limit of the boiler one would expect around 1,150-1,200ihp from one of these locomotives, so it was still someway within its maximum capacity.
A little more light on these services can been gleaned from the online Railway Performance Society (RPS) archive/database with regard to the post-war era, and there is just enough data on hand to give some idea of what the daily commuter experienced on his or her way home from a day in the office. Motive power by 1952 consisted of the Fairburn/Stanier and Fowler variants of the LMS 2-6-4Ts that were augmented by the British Railways ‘4MT’ ‘80000’ 2-6-4Ts and ‘75000’ 4-6-0 classes. Any number of classes made odd appearances, especially the ubiquitous ‘Black Five’ 4-6-0s on selected workings, but less humble power in the form of the Horwich Hughes/Fowler ‘Crab’ 2-6-0s and the odd Fowler ‘4F’ 0-6-0 did appear from time to time if the evidence of the RPS archive/database is anything to go by.
This article will mainly concentrate on the section between Euston and Watford Junction in the down direction, but before looking at the logs, a little recounting of the line’s topography may be useful to readers. The start out of Euston is certainly steep, reflecting the use of rope haulage in the early days of operation, which sharpens to a short pitch of 1 in 70 towards Camden. After this, the line is level with a few undulations towards Brent Junction, from where it ascends on a 1 in 339 gradient to around Milepost 14½ just before Carpenders Park. The line then gently undulates to Watford, with a level section
between the latter and Bushey. According to my October 1960 Sectional Appendix, the maximum speed on the slow lines was 60mph between Euston and Roade. However, I suspect that many of these semi-fast trains did use the fast lines for at least part of their journey and the maximum speed on these was 90mph, well beyond what any steam locomotive could attain, with the exception of a ‘Duchess’ on ‘The Caledonian’ if one of these Pacifics was steamed to the limit of its boiler.
Presented in Table One, Run 1 represents the old order in the form of L&NWR ‘Prince of Wales’ class 4-6-0 No 25672 during the inter-war period. By this time this locomotive had lost its Condor name, in August 1933, and Stanier’s relentless ‘scrap and build’ policy was in full swing, with many of the former
L&NWR types disappearing at a rapid rate, despite being relatively modern. The last engines of this class were not constructed until 1924, but by the autumn of 1936, when Derek Barrie timed this effort, the class was eking out an existence on secondary work of this type. The 4-6-0 made a decent start and was doing relatively well until it was eased at Wembley where speed fell at a steady rate up the 1 in 339 gradient to Harrow, where it gradually ebbed to 50mph. However,
No 25672 kept the 25 minute allowance to Watford Junction with comparative ease and the running was redolent of a professional engineman who knew where to ‘push’ and where to ‘ease’ the locomotive.
Run 2 takes us forward to the post-war period and features a British Railways Standard ‘4MT’ 2-6-4T. These locomotives were introduced on the West Coast main in 1952, and two years later Mike Bland was on hand to time this very competent effort behind No 80081. The power output estimate reflects the maximum standard that these locomotives could attain on a daily, if not exceptional, basis, in other words, around 950-1,000 indicated horsepower in short bursts. This standard of work reinforces their credentials on the Southern Region, which was featured in the December 2018 issue of Steam Days magazine.
Table Two features successive generations of power, and both runs represent excellent efforts for their respective types. In Run 3, Richard Knight was on hand to time a superb effort behind BR Standard 2-6-4T No 80067. The quality of the work is graphically shown on the 1 in 339 gradient between Wembley and Harrow where the locomotive accelerated from 53mph at the former to 64mph at the latter. No doubt this was accompanied by a cannonade of an exhaust that would sharpen as the locomotive ascended the gradient in the most emphatic of fashions.
Run 4 features the new breed in the form of a Sulzer ‘Type 2’ (later class ‘24’). These locomotives were rated at 1,160 brake horsepower and on a daily basis were more than a match for a class ‘4’-rated steam locomotive. However, at the top end of performance envelope, the tank engine ‘had the edge’ over the new form of motive power, as the log testifies. The diesel was eased after Harrow due to an easy schedule, this reflecting ongoing engineering work on the West Coast main line electrification scheme.
Table Three features a run behind British Railways Standard ‘4MT’ 4-6-0 No 75039. The ‘75000s’ were theoretically the tender version of the ‘80000’ tanks but for whatever reason in single chimney form these engines always seemed to lack ‘punch’ when the opportunity presented itself. This was reflected in the eventual fitting of double chimneys, on the Southern Region where these engines worked the onerous Oxted line commuter services along with the ‘80000’ tanks amongst others. This treatment didn’t extend, however to the London Midland Region batch and perhaps the semi-fast duties out of Euston were the borderline case for re-draughting.
On the 6.37pm ex-Euston the crew of No 75039 coaxed a reasonable effort. An edhp/ihp of around 650/1,000 has been estimated on the 1 in 339 rise from Wembley to Harrow, which comfortably kept time to Watford Junction. This is one of very best efforts the author has seen behind a single chimney ‘75000’ in normal service, but is still someway short of what the class should have been capable of. Reference to the British Transport Bulletin for fellow class member No 75006 reveals that this locomotive produced 1,000 dbhp/edhp at 60mph when steamed to the limit of its boiler, which is very similar to the speed range of No 75039 between the two aforementioned locations. It is a salutary reminder of just how much of a chasm there was between maximum potential power and what you recorded in the hurly-burly world that characterized steam operation in the United Kingdom. The ‘75000s’ were certainly not alone in this respect, but as a general rule the better classes did occasionally replicate the findings of the test plant and controlled road testing in normal service.
Run 6 features a Stanier tank, and by contrast these always had a good reputation on the steaming front. The run behind No 2610 on 17 July 1947 is a timekeeping effort as opposed to a spectacular performance, but it is interesting in showing just how much power was required to run the schedules to time. As can be glanced from the estimates, only a modest level of power was required, but quite often, such schedules had to take into account faulty regulation or conflicting traffic movements, and also temporary speed restrictions. In the immediate post-war era the UK suffered more than its fair share of the last mentioned due to the arrears of track maintenance that had accrued during the six years of war.
Table Four features the Fairburn variant of the 2-6-4T. On 19 September 1950 locomotive No 2117 was obviously in fine fettle and was driven by an enthusiastic crew (Run 7). The gold standard for performance for a class ‘4’ rated engine was to sustain 57-60mph on the 1 in 339 grade between the outskirts of Brent Junction and Hatch End with a seven consist. The runs in this article underline this and would involve at least 950-1,000ihp for part of the distance between these two locations. The severity of some of the timings on these services was elaborated upon by A J Powell in his eminently readable Living with London Midland Locomotives. He cites the 14-minute allowance from Willesden Junction to
Watford on the 5.43pm Euston-Bletchley, which had a 7/205/230 consist (seven coaches, 205 tons tare, 230 tons gross). Unfortunately he doesn’t provide a log, but he did mention that on one occasion No 42589, a Fairburn example, required full regulator and 30% on the reverser to adhere to the schedule. This would require around 680/1,000 edhp/ihp, very similar to the estimates the author has made on the previous runs in this article, and provide corroboration to the best efforts timed by other recorders. Run 8 features one of the ubiquitous ‘Black Fives’ on the 6.37pm Euston-Bletchley service on 21 September 1955. Certainly No 44837 was not unduly pushed, for the simple reason that the schedule didn’t require it, and made it to Watford Junction comfortably within the 27-minute allowance.
Table Five (see overleaf ) features a run behind BR Standard ‘4MT’ 4-6-0 No 75036, which had a different stopping pattern to the
other services in this article. As will be seen, the schedules were surprisingly ‘tight’ on some sections. The most energetic part of the work was the gradual acceleration from Hatch End to Bushey, which rose from 39mph at the former to 58 at the latter. This was worth around 730/960 edhp/ihp, pretty respectable work for a class ‘4’ on a semi-fast stopping service I would guess anywhere in the UK during the steam era.
Looking at these runs in more critical light reveals there is nothing that couldn’t have been done by either a ‘Precursor’ or a ‘George the Fifth’ 4-4-0 in their prime, especially in the case of the latter. O S Nock’s numerous books and articles on L&NWR locomotive matters reveal this quite vividly,
but where these engines were top link locomotives on expresses, the later generation of motive power reflected the changing economic circumstances of the steam locomotive in the UK with an emphasis on economy in operation, and as an end result, moderate steaming rates. This policy manifested itself in larger locomotives being built to do the same job as replacements for the previous generation of motive power. By contrast, the L&NWR 4-4-0s were often ‘thrashed’, with the inevitable result that coal consumption rose exponentially, this wasn’t such a problem when the cost of coal and labour were relatively low, but after the Wall Street crash, in 1929, these conditions never returned.