The locomotives of Carlisle London Road engine shed
The motive power of this North Eastern Railway shed is evaluated by Roger Griffiths and John Hooper across the grouping and through its lengthy demise under the LNER from 1925 to 1942 and thereafter.
Roger Griffiths and John Hooper evaluate the motive power of Carlisle’s primary North Eastern Railway engine shed across the grouping and through its lengthy demise under the LNER from 1925 to 1942, and thereafter with no allocation as a servicing point for visiting locomotives and with the double roundhouse in use for wagon maintenance.
The Newcastle & Carlisle Railway opened an engine shed immediately east of London Road, Carlisle on 19 July 1836, adjacent to its then western terminus with its passenger and goods facilities. However, March 1837 saw the railway extended beyond there, west to Rome Street, in Carlisle’s canal basin area. A single-road N&CR engine shed was established there – see ‘Carlisle’s LNER sheds: West’ (Steam Days January 2021) – but that ultimately was most likely a victim of amalgamation with the North Eastern Railway on 17 July 1862 and subsequent investment in the London Road site. From New Year’s Day 1863 NER passenger trains bypassed the former N&CR passenger terminus to instead use Citadel station (jointly as one of six companies) and the transformation of London Road’s facilities followed – see ‘Carlisle’s LNER sheds: North and East’ (Steam Days July 2021) – both in terms of goods operations and in locomotive servicing.
During its independence, the Newcastle & Carlisle Railway established engine sheds at Blaydon in 1835, Haydon Bridge, Greenhead, and Carlisle (all opened in 1836), Carlisle Basin and Redheugh (both 1837), Newcastle-upon-Tyne Shot Tower (1839), Newcastle-upon-Tyne Forth Banks and Redheugh No 2 shed (both 1847), Newcastle Central station (1850) and Alston (1852). In addition, Gateshead Chayters Bank roundhouse was built for N&CR locomotives but opened post-NER absorption, and it should be noted that the ex-N&CR premises at Blaydon closed in 1839, Greenhead was out of use circa 1842, Shot Tower in 1847 and at 1862 Carlisle Basin was likely only for servicing rather than stabling, so a similar role to a Haltwhistle stabling point, albeit that facility proved long-lived. Under the NER, the ex-N&CR wooden building at Shot Tower was moved to Sprouston in 1863, and the use of Haydon Bridge and Forth Banks ceased, respectively in 1875 and 1880, while the NER takeover saw the NBR gain Hexham-Newcastle running rights, and use of the Central station two-road engine shed under a lease, through to its closure in 1890; subsequently NBR locomotives went to Gateshead Chayters Bank and then to Blaydon.
The sheds west of the Alston branch (inclusive) have been covered in the ‘West’ and ‘East’ sections of our Carlisle quadrilogy, all having allegiance to what became the LNER’s London Road shed, so it just remains to look at the allocation of that shed in LNER days and, where possible, include a little of its pre-LNER back-story for locomotives.
Upon amalgamation, 39 ex-N&CR locomotives passed to the North Eastern Railway, and being the main line shed at the west end of the line the premises at London Road must have had its fair share on the books, or at least visiting, albeit there was only a two-road engine shed until NER investment, initially in 1864. The absorbed fleet consisted of 27 0-6-0s and a dozen four-coupled tender engines of either 0-4-2 or 2-4-0 wheel arrangement. They became NER Nos 453 to 491, but withdrawals came swiftly – nine were gone by the end of the 1860s, and just ten ex-N&CR locomotives saw continued use after 1881, all 0-6-0s of 1853 to 1861 build. Inevitably, North Eastern Railway locomotives had been drafted in as replacements, but little
information seems to exist in regard to the company’s allocation to Carlisle. The exceptions are the allocations for the final day of 1920 and exactly two years later, on the last day of North Eastern Railway operations.
At the end of 1920 there were 51 locomotives allocated to the NER’s shed in Carlisle, as follows:
Allocation at 31 December 1920:
(Subsequent LNER classification in brackets)
‘398’ 0-6-0 (‘398’): 32, 45, 991
‘1463’ 2-4-0 (‘E5’): 1464, 1478
‘A’ 2-4-2T (‘F8’): 1171
‘B’ 0-6-2T (‘N8’): 271, 503
‘BTP’ 0-4-4T (‘G6’): 60, 273, 322, 1089
‘C’ 0-6-0 (‘J21’): 104, 511, 568, 570, 666, 872, 1562, 1802
‘E’ 0-6-0T (‘J71’): 261, 285, 453
‘F’ 4-4-0 (‘D22’): 154, 355, 356, 779
‘M’ 4-4-0 (‘D17/1’) 1623
‘P1’ 0-6-0 (‘J25’): 257, 2075, 2140
‘P2’ 0-6-0 (‘J26’): 67
‘P3’ 0-6-0 (‘J27’): 790, 839, 1061, 1065, 1067
‘Q’ 4-4-0 (‘D17/2’): 1874, 1876, 1880, 1901, 1909,
1910, 1921, 1924, 1926, 1927, 1928
‘T2’ 0-8-0 (‘Q6’): 2254, 2257, 2258
Total 51
In terms of locomotive design, five of the six eras of North Eastern Railway locomotive superintendent/chief mechanical engineer are represented within the 1920 allocation: Edward Fletcher 1854-82 (retired) thanks to four ‘BTP’ tank engines and a trio of ‘398s’; Alexander McDonnell 1882-84 (resigned) produced just two unrepresented designs (class ‘38’ 4-4-0 and ‘59’ 0-6-0) but the subsequent interregnum period of 1884/85 is represented when Henry Tennant was the NER general manager and locomotives were designed by a committee, including the ‘1463’ 2-4-0s; Thomas William Worsdell 1885-90 (retired) thanks to his ‘A’, ‘B’, ‘C’, ‘E’ and ‘F’ classes; Wilson Worsdell 1890-1910 (retired) through the ‘M’ and ‘Q’ classes of 4-4-0, and ‘P1’, ‘P2’ and ‘P3’ 0-6-0s; Vincent Litchfield Raven 1910-23 as chief mechanical engineer until the grouping, with three brand new ‘T2’ class 0-8-0s thus far on the Carlisle books.
Nominally, ‘398’ class No 991 is the oldest locomotive on the Carlisle books at this time, at nearly 40 years. It was completed in October 1874 but in April 1881 had its 5ft diameter driving wheels replaced by a 4ft 9in set; its 17in x 24in cylinders had their bore increased to 17½ inches in January 1899, and then a Worsdell boiler was fitted in November 1899, so it was much improved by then. The lengthy lifespan of the other six Fletcher engines at Carlisle also owed much to rebuilding, which was largely the case even for the younger locomotives across the 20 year tenure of Wilson Worsdell.
The allocation for exactly two years later is seen overleaf, with the fleet standing at 48 locomotives. Despite the short amount of time that has passed, four classes had been lost to Carlisle’s allocation – the Tennant ‘1463’
(LNER ‘E5’) 2-4-0, T W Worsdell ‘A’ (F8) class 2-4-2T, Wilson Worsdell ‘M’ (‘D17/1’) 4-4-0 and the same engineer’s ‘P2’ (‘J26’) 0-6-0. Completely unchanged are the presence of the ‘398’ 0-6-0s, ‘E’ (‘J71’) 0-6-0Ts, and ‘P1’ (‘J25’) 0-6-0s, while the ‘B’ (‘N8’) 0-6-2T fleet saw one exchanged (No 503 for 855). Overall, the 4-4-0 allocation dipped from 16 to 12 despite the arrival of ‘F’ (‘D22’) No 1324 and Nos 1925 and 1929 of the ‘Q’ (‘D17/2’) class. An incoming ‘C’ (‘J21’) class, No 1813, balanced the loss of younger ‘P3’ (‘J27’) No 1061. Notably, ‘C’ No 1802 was never a Compound, unlike its 1920 classmates at Carlisle, but was rebuilt in this latter day pre-grouping period, receiving a ‘398’ boiler in April 1921 and retaining this
until December 1933. The 0-6-0 and 2-4-0 losses were recouped by an increase in ‘T2’ 0-8-0s, up from three to six locomotives.
Allocation at 31 December 1922:
‘398’ 0-6-0: 32, 45, 991
‘D17/2’ 4-4-0: 1876, 1901, 1910, 1921, 1924, 1925,
1926, 1928, 1929
‘D22’ 4-4-0: 154, 355, 1324
‘G5’ 0-4-4T: 2084
‘G6’ 0-4-4T: 60, 273, 322, 605, 624
‘J21’ 0-6-0: 104, 511, 568, 570, 666, 872, 1562,
1802, 1813
‘J25’ 0-6-0: 257, 2075, 2140
‘J27’ 0-6-0: 790, 839, 1065, 1067
‘J71’ 0-6-0T: 261, 285, 453
‘N8’ 0-6-2T: 503, 855
‘Q6’ 0-8-0: 2254, 2257, 2259, 2268, 2271, 2281 Total 48
LNER allocations
We now present locomotive allocations for London Road shed from the grouping, and earlier where known, through to the date of ‘closure’ – 5 September 1942? Allocated to the shed across this period were 60 different locomotives from 14 classes, all of North Eastern Railway origin, and one Sentinel Steam Waggon Company built steam railcar of the LNER era, our review broadly following the alpha-numeric classification system of the LNER. The subsequent tables show the early LNER number, which more often than not was also the last NER running number for the locomotive.
London Road shed had 12 North Eastern Railway ‘Q’ class 4-4-0s from 1910 when they were displaced from the East Coast main line by the arrival of Wilson Worsdell’s ‘V’ class Atlantics of 1903/04 and the ‘V09s’ of 1910 (both types became LNER ‘C6’); the Raven ‘V2’ (later ‘Z’ and LNER ‘C7’) 4-4-2s appeared from July 1911. At the grouping these Wilson Worsdell 4-4-0s became class ‘D17/2’ and nine were still at London Road – Table One covers the shed’s post-grouping 4-4-0 allocation, ‘D17/2’ and ‘D22’ classes. Known at London Road as ‘Coppertops’, the ‘D17/2s’ were used on the Newcastle services over what was classed as a main line by the North Eastern Railway; the top link passenger men each had their own engine. The three ‘D17/2s’ transferred away in 1942 were in store at London Road for a period prior to departure, with Nos 1876 and 1921 becoming the last locomotives on the London Road books.
The T W Worsdell ‘D22s’ listed in the same table each started life in a different guise, No 1324 as a ‘D’ class 2-4-0 in November 1886 (notably shown at Newcastle Exhibition in 1887) and No 355 as an ‘F’ class 4-4-0 in November 1887, both boasting Von Borries compounding, and No 154 as the Simple version of the latter, as ‘F1’ class in December 1887. All three had Joy valve gear and slide valves but saw this arrangement replaced by Stephenson link motion with piston valves. Once converted, the ‘F1s’ effectively became the LNER ‘D22s’ of 1923 – No 355 was rebuilt from ‘F’ to ‘F1’ Simple in October 1901, while No 1324 was rebuilt from 2-4-0 Compound directly to ‘F1’ 4-4-0 Simple in October 1896. Incidentally, the ‘F1’ classification would no longer be needed after October 1905 as by then all the ‘F’ Compounds had been rebuilt under Wilson Worsdell, but it was not until June 1914 that the ‘F1’ sub-class adopted the ‘F’ classification. The last of this trio of ‘Fs’ to be superheated
was No 1324 in February 1917. As ‘D22’ these 4-4-0s were latterly used at Carlisle on empty carriage duties into and out of Citadel station, and they also worked passenger trains to Brampton Junction and Haltwhistle. Built by the NER at Gateshead, interestingly all three were maintained at Gateshead Works rather than at Darlington.
Table Two unites London Road shed’s four-coupled tank engine designs, the oldest being the Fletcher-designed ‘Bogie Tank Passenger’ or ‘BTP’ that became ‘G6’ post-grouping, this data bridging the 31 December 1922/1 January 1923 transfer of assets from the NER to London & North Eastern Railway, and concluding during the first summer of the ‘Big Four’. A class of 124 locomotives with numerous differences between batches, the five ‘BTPs’ on the London Road books at the grouping dated from the 1876 to 1880 period and all were in their twilight days, with No 624 condemned at London Road, and No 322 withdrawn soon after its transfer to Selby. Notably, No 605, a product of Darlington Works, was auto-fitted from circa 1905, so was the likely favourite for the Brampton Town branch until that line’s demise in 1923. Otherwise, they were used on suburban passenger duties and empty stock movements.
The other 0-4-4T class was the ‘G5’ (NER ‘O’), which worked suburban passenger trains from Carlisle out to Haltwhistle, alongside the ‘G6’, while the appearance of ‘F8’ (NER ‘A’) class 2-4-2T No 423 for an 11-month residence is likely as a replacement for ‘G5’ No 2084. Generally speaking, ‘F8s’ were heavily involved with suburban passenger duties, with this particular engine retreating to Gateshead when London Road was transferred from the North East Area to Southern Scotland control in June 1925.
Table Three covers the comings and goings of the 0-6-0 tender engine fleet, these being core to the movement of mineral traffic. The limited pre-grouping information reveals that the four ‘J27s’ arrived new in 1906 and 1909 as NER ‘P3’, and that at the grouping there were 19 0-6-0s on the London Road books, the oldest being the Fletcher ‘398’ class. At Carlisle the latter class performed every type of job imaginable and were very capable, being fitted for passenger work to run excursions besides their everyday freight duties on fast goods trains, and latterly they also saw use on transfer jobs. Two of the London Road trio – Nos 45 and 991 – were loaned to the Highland Railway during World War I. Being amongst the oldest of the class, No 991 – R & W Hawthorn & Co Works No 1632 of October 1874 – was earmarked for preservation at York museum but the idea was dropped in favour of Great Northern Railway Stirling Single No 1, with No 991 withdrawn in May 1925.
The next oldest of the 0-6-0 types on the allocation was the NER ‘59’ class as LNER ‘J22’. The Carlisle engines were used on banking duties on the Newcastle line, up to Naworth, just over 12 miles from Carlisle, with a significant 1 in 107 climb east from Wetheral and, soon after that, 1 in 128 through Brampton Junction to the summit. The three ‘J22s’ replaced a ‘J21’ and two ‘J25s’ when London Road was transferred into the LNER’s Southern Scottish Area. Two of them,
Nos 502 and 1482, had tenders fitted with weatherboards and their cab roofs extended rearwards especially for the banking job; No 388 had neither of these alterations. Their designer, Alexander McDonnell, became the NER locomotive superintendent in 1882 and in many ways was not a natural successor to Edward Fletcher, his adoption of left-hand drive being among ill-received changes. His resignation was followed by six months of interregnum until T W Worsdell was appointed in April 1885, and his younger brother followed in 1893. Unlike his older brother, Wilson Worsdell did not favour compounding, or Joy valve gear, the ‘J21’ fleet at London Road being largely ex-Compounds (‘C’ class). The exceptions were Nos 1802 and 1813, although even they were ordered as Compounds but built as ‘C1’ Simples. The ‘Cs’ were rebuilt as Simples between 1903 and
1911 under Wilson Worsdell’s tenure. Notably, nine ‘J21s’ were resident at London Road at the grouping, but only two survived into the ‘closure years’ of the shed; that is to say beyond the transfer to the Southern Scotland Area on 1 June 1925.
Three of the four Wilson Worsdell 0-6-0 designs appear in the post-grouping allocation, the ‘P3’/‘J27’ being the most powerful – they worked goods to Newcastle and the eastern centres of the former NER area, but rarely, if ever, worked over the Waverley route, which is the reason why the class was never ‘transferred’ to Canal. Three ‘J25s’ were on the books on New Year’s Day 1923 and were used in Carlisle for transfer trips between yards until the 1925 area change saw the final two exchanged for three McDonnell ‘J22s’ from the North Eastern Area. The ‘J24s’ were used for banking on the Newcastle & Carlisle line, appearing once the ‘398’ and ‘J25’ classes were lost from London Road, from 1927, and the ‘J22s’ soon followed. Despite being of NER design, it will be noted that all seven ‘J24s’ arrived in Carlisle via Scottish sheds – they had previously been part of a batch of ten transferred to Scotland during the period April to June 1924 where their low axle weight enabled use on lightly laid branches. London Road, of course, remained in the Southern Scottish Area so transfers were easily arranged. Remarkably, No 1841 ran with a weatherboard on its tender until condemned in August 1938, and note the late departure of Nos 1900D (November 1940) and 1955D (May 1942) – one went back from whence it came, and the final member headed for Tyneside.
The five T W Worsdell six-coupled tank engines that were London Road-based at the grouping are recorded in Table Four, and their gradual drift away, starting with ‘J71’ No 261 being transferred to Hull in May 1923. No record has been found of what this class did while at Carlisle, but shunting and pilot work is likely. The pair, reallocated to Eastfield in 1926, was then employed working ‘dead’ engines from Eastfield to Cowlairs Works for attention. As for the ‘N8s’, the two on the books at the start of 1923 were originally the first two class ‘B’ compounds but were rebuilt to become the Simple (class ‘B1’) variant in June 1904
(No 855) and March 1908 (No 9); No 503 was NER No 9 until January 1914. Both these engines were amongst the dozen Gatesheadbuilt lot from 1888; the other 50 were Darlington built. One of the pair had steam
brake only and the other was Westinghouse fitted – it was the latter engine that became a useful stand-by for working empty passenger stock whenever a ‘G5’ 0-4-4T wasn’t available. When No 855 went into Darlington shops for scrapping on 17 January 1939, the engine portion was retrieved from the scrap yard and used for No 856, which had been cut up by mistake on 31 January! Interestingly, during the period between being condemned at London Road and entering Darlington Works, No 855 had apparently travelled from Carlisle via Cowlairs!
Vincent Raven’s ‘T2’ class was the first NER 0-8-0 type with superheat, and the six sent new to London Road – see Table Five for their time at Carlisle London Road – were all built by Sir W G Armstrong, Whitworth & Co Ltd at Scotswood, the company’s premises being between the Newcastle & Carlisle line and the River Tyne, only about four miles from Newcastle city centre. The order was for a batch of fifty 0-8-0s and these were the first locomotives built at Scotswood Works after its wartime production of ordnance, with NER No 2254 being Works No 2. Becoming ‘Q6’ at the grouping, they were employed on general goods and mineral trains to the east, returning with mineral, mainly coal trains from County Durham to Carlisle. During 1924 their number was halved at London Road but the trio that remained served the shed until the final week of March 1939, when they seemingly departed one by one in a somewhat covert fashion! In actuality No 2254 went straight into Darlington shops for a general overhaul (31 March-16 May 1939), and Nos 2257 and 2259 went directly to Hartlepool, albeit a week apart.
Finally, one Sentinel railcar was on the books of London Road shed between 25 April 1930 and 18 September 1933. When received from the makers, being a NE Area acquisition No 2276 North Briton went initially to Heaton shed prior to being allocated new to London Road to start a new railcar service from Carlisle to Brampton and Haltwhistle. Listed under Carriage Diagram No 97, during August 1931 this car was renumbered 31070 in the Scottish
Area Coaching Stock series. Transferred from London Road to Heaton in autumn 1933, North Briton reverted to its original number in March 1935 during a general overhaul at Darlington, when it was of course back within the folds of the North Eastern Area for good.
Is it not interesting to note that from all the 48 locomotives at London Road at the grouping, not one was actually, formally transferred to Carlisle Canal. Table Six isa statistical analysis of the natural wastage of London Road’s allocation through ‘real’ transfers and withdrawals at year-on-year end from 31 December 1922 to 31 December 1942. The lead up to, and actual transfer of North Eastern Area stock at Carlisle to the Southern Scottish Area in 1925 made a distinct change in the numbers, but subsequent reductions became a trickle for a time when two tranches of ‘J24s’ and others were brought in to replace condemned engines. Note the small number of, by comparison, ‘modern’ engines – three each of ‘J27’ and ‘Q6’ – kept on until the eve of war. Then there were the three venerable ‘D17/2’, two of which, and an almost equally aged ‘J24’, hung on to the bitter end. Why the reluctance to give up these elderly classes? Did the accountants simply forget them?
Dated shed allocations: LNER period
Customarily in their LNER shed articles the authors have tried to present details of shed visits and allocations at fixed points in time but in the case of London Road we have found no full records of depot visits, so the following allocations will largely have to suffice.
Allocation at 1 June 1925:
‘D17/2’ 4-4-0: 1876, 1901, 1921, 1924, 1926
‘D22’ 4-4-0: 154, 355, 1324
‘J21’ 0-6-0: 104, 511, 1562, 1802, 1813
‘J22’ 0-6-0: 388, 502
‘J27’ 0-6-0: 790, 839, 1067
‘J71’ 0-6-0T: 285, 453
‘N8’ 0-6-2T: 855
‘Q6’ 0-8-0: 2254, 2257, 2259
Total: 24
The day the depot was transferred to the LNER’s Southern Scottish Area, but the locomotives listed above remained ‘on the books’. Compared with the 1 January 1923 listing of 48 engines, 26 had moved away for one reason or another, and two had arrived (‘J22’), making the total 24.
Allocation at 31 December 1927:
‘D17/2’ 4-4-0: 1876, 1901, 1921, 1924, 1926
‘D22’ 4-4-0: 154, 355, 1324
‘J21’ 0-6-0: 104, 511
‘J22’ 0-6-0: 502
‘J24’ 0-6-0: 1841, 1944, 1949
‘J27’ 0-6-0: 790, 839, 1067
‘N8’ 0-6-2T: 855
‘Q6’ 0-8-0: 2254, 2257, 2259
Total: 21
Note there had been a few changes of complement since 1925, but only three fewer engines were still ‘on the books’ of this supposedly subordinate depot, the relatively nearby former North British Railway shed Carlisle Canal being its parent once London Road was part of the LNER’s Scottish operations. The LNER’s accountants may have been in charge, but locally NBR and NER traditions were still apparently being observed!
Before long the official shed allocations dry up, even though engine record cards would continue to state London Road for another 15 years, creating a strange official oddity, but in the 1930s we can at least begin to glean some additional ‘on the ground’ information from dated photographs that helps to complement the official view. Photographer F A Wycherley visited on Sunday, 31 July 1932 and recorded the presence of both Reid ‘N15’ 0-6-2T
No 9219 and Sentinel railcar No 2276 North Briton to the south side of the coal stage at London Road shed. The former is a Canal-allocated locomotive and is seemingly not in steam, most likely on its day of rest from working the goods yards at London Road, while the railcar is likewise out of steam but a London Road asset for Carlisle-Haltwhistle work. On a dull day, perhaps there was not enough light to record a view of whatever resided in the 40-locomotive capacity double-round-house, so that remains a mystery.
Allocation at 31 December 1932:
‘D17/2’ 4-4-0: 1876, 1901, 1921, 1924
‘J21’ 0-6-0: 104, 511
‘J24’ 0-6-0: 1841, 1944, 1955
‘J27’ 0-6-0: 790, 839, 1067
‘N8’ 0-6-2T: 855
‘Q6’ 0-8-0: 2254, 2257, 2259
Railcar: 2276 North Briton
Total 17
This was just before London Road depot was supposedly closed, officially sometime in 1933, after which the double-roundhouse would be given over to wagon repairs transferred in from Canal, and yet the engine record cards reveal a continued allocation of (initially) 17 engines at London Road – perhaps the ‘official closure’ refers to maintenance of locomotives and at least some staffing continued, or was there a reluctance to officially transfer the ‘North Eastern’ fleet to the ex-NBR shed at Canal?
In this grey area bridging ‘closure’, we revert to observations between 1933 and the outbreak of war in 1939. Through the services of Kidderminster Railway Museum we have been able to access and include the work of photographer Vivian Raymond Webster (known to many as Ray), who visited Carlisle with R W Tomkins on Sunday, 6 August 1933 and took at least seven photographs in and around the double roundhouse at London Road. On that day he recorded nine locomotives on site, five of which were at home, with the others from Carlisle Canal or Gateshead. For the record, identifiable in the views are Reid ‘C11’ Atlantic No 9880
Tweeddale (Carlisle Canal), Wilson Worsdell ‘D17/2’ 4-4-0s Nos 1921 and 1924, the same designer’s ‘D20’ 4-4-0 No 2104 (Gateshead), Reid ‘D29’ 4-4-0 No 9360 Guy Mannering (Carlisle Canal), Reid ‘D30’ 4-4-0 No 9426
Norna (Carlisle Canal), T W Worsdell ‘J21’ 0-6-0 No 104, Wilson Worsdell ‘J24’ 0-6-0 No 1944 and T W Worsdell ‘N8’ 0-6-2T No 855. However, it is clear that at least one other ex-North British Railway 4-4-0 was also in the south roundhouse.
To solve the mystery we are grateful to Peter Webster, Ray’s son, for a look at the notes from the day – an overnight excursion from Euston to Carlisle, and then shed visits, with permits, to Kingmoor, Canal, London Road, Durran Hill and Upperby. No 9426
Norna was not recorded in Ray’s notes, but this must be an oversight as his photograph at the top of page 21 of the July 2021 issue of
Steam Days clearly shows Nos 1924 and 9426 together, and perhaps R W Tomkins ‘cabbing’ the former. The ‘Engines seen’ section of his notes include ‘Scott’ class 4-4-0 No 9420
The Abbot, as well as all the others mentioned, so perhaps there were at least ten resident engines that day. The ‘D29s’ and ‘D30s’ of Canal shed (and visiting it) were clearly at home on the Newcastle & Carlisle line at this time. Perhaps the transfer of the Sentinel railcar from London Road from 18 September 1933 is actually a marker of ‘closure’? The end of the peak summer service is often a time of operational change on Britain’s railways.
There is thereafter a lack of subsequent photographs of locomotives at London Road – is this an indication that the other Carlisle sheds were a bigger ‘draw’ to enthusiasts, or were such sights as double-figures of engines at London Road soon to be a thing of the past? The latter seems likely from the photographic evidence we have collated.
In contrast, across a vast array of photographers the first ex-NER locomotive recorded at Canal shed was ‘N8’ 0-6-2T No 855 in 1934, while well known photographer W L (Leslie) Good visited Durran Hill shed (former Midland Railway) in September 1934 but has
no record of the neighbouring London Road premises – perhaps suggesting that there were no locomotives to photograph. CFH Oldham also visited Durran Hill shed, on 13 July 1935, and again has nothing at London Road. Finally, we have photographic evidence from 1936,
1937 and 1939 of ex-North Eastern locomotives on Canal shed, but nothing of them post-August 1933 at London Road. A visit to Canal shed on Friday, 19 June 1936 saw ‘D17/2’ 4-4-0 No 1901 and ‘J24’ class 0-6-0 No 1841 recorded, and then F A Wyncherley visited Canal on Tuesday, 10 August 1937 and recorded three ex-NER locomotives – ‘D17/2’ 4-4-0 No 1921, ‘J24’ No 1841 (again) and ‘Q6’ 0-8-0 No 2254. As we conclude this work, the latest dated image located of a former NER locomotive on Canal shed is of ‘D17/2’ No 1901 (again) on Monday, 10 April 1939, which seems to have been photographed by N Fields. The engine record cards state that all five of the quoted locomotives were on the London Road allocation at that time, but was that shed even being used by 1934 for anything but the everyday servicing the engines working the neighbouring yard or on incoming trains?
Readers may recall from our ‘Locomotives of Carlisle Canal shed’ feature that in terms of the record cards at least, no ex-NER locomotives joined the Canal allocation, but perhaps that was playing to the local railwaymen’s allegiances, who were either NB or NE men. Indeed, was there a need to make a transfer if both sheds were active? Meanwhile, increasingly Canal shed covered Newcastle & Carlisle line passenger work in LNER days, initially with Reid 4-4-0s and Atlantics, hence their presence during
V R Webster’s August 1933 visit to London Road, but with no NER presence that day at Canal. Whatever the reasoning, it would be the three ‘D17/2’ 4-4-0s and two ‘J24’ 0-6-0s on the London Road cards after 1939 that brought down the curtain on the local allocation of former North Eastern Railway engines. March/April 1939 had seen the London Road fleet reduced from 13 locomotives to just five – ‘J24’ No 1858D went to St Margarets, sister locomotive No 1845D headed for Borough Green, the three ‘Q6s’ went to West Hartlepool, and the trio of ‘J27s’ to Percy Main. However, in fact of those listed in our tables above, ‘J24’ No 1900D lingered until November 1940, while three ‘D17/2s’ and another ‘J24’ did not come off the books until April to September 1942 transfers.
A shed with no engines
Although the double roundhouse building had been given over to wagon repairs since 1933, and despite the loss of a home fleet of engines, the locomotive servicing facilities were retained to seamlessly continue to serve the needs of locomotives visiting the still active London Road goods facilities. Although this role continued for many years, photographs are surprisingly elusive, an exception being a 27 July 1956 view of Peppercorn ‘K1’ class 2-6-0 No 62010, which was Blaydon (52C)-allocated at the time. Most likely it worked a train to the nearby yard and was recorded during watering – Blaydon men used to haul up to 15 return freight and mineral trains over the Newcastle & Carlisle route each weekday – but of course it could also be working to and from the, by then, long established wagon repair facility.
The very last reference that we have found to locomotives on the London Road shed site, in this case through local enthusiast Howie Milburn, comes from newspaper reports of April 1961. Firstly, in the Cumberland Evening News of Monday, 24 April under the headline ‘Locomotive ran off lines and crashed through shed – Lindisfarne Street got rude awakening’, the report reads:
‘A LARGE railway locomotive left the lines and cut its way clean through a single-storey stone shed at the back of Lindisfarne Street, off London Road, Carlisle, just after 2am yesterday. It came to rest about five yards from the back doors of the houses on the south side. The crash wakened many people in the street.
The 123 ton Class 9 locomotive, which had brought a freight train from Birmingham to Carlisle during the night, had left its train at the London Road goods depot and gone to the London Road sheds for coaling. While it was being coaled the engine suddenly moved and ran about 100 yards forward along the line to a turntable. The lines ended at the turntable but the engine went on about another 20 yards and crashed into the wall of the empty shed, which was formerly a tram shed when Carlisle had trams on the streets. The engine tore through both the front and rear walls of the shed and carried on across an open space about four yards wide. When it finally came to rest its front wheels were overhanging a four-foot lane separating the open space from the back-yard doors of the houses.
SIX HOURS TASK – A break-down crane was immediately sent for and this arrived from the Kingmoor Depot about 3am. The engine had to be dragged bodily back on to the turntable as it could not be lifted and this operation took about six hours. The driver was Mr James Caven, of 12 Braken Close, Carlisle, who was on top of the coal stage when the engine moved, and the fireman was Mr Robert Pate, of 79 Ridley Road, Carlisle, who was actually on the engine all the time it was moving. The only damage the engine sustained was buckled smoke deflectors on the front and no one was injured.
CAUGHT THE WATER – Mr Caven stated that he was on the coal stage at the time and asked his fireman, who is a passed fireman, to move the engine forward a yard to get more coal on. The fireman did so, but the engine ‘caught the water’ and in spite of his strenuous efforts he could not stop it from moving. Mr Caven added that such a thing could happen to any driver. He had just taken the engine over at the London Road Depot and it appeared to be in perfect working order.
Note: ‘Caught the water’ is a technical expression used by engine drivers meaning that the regulator could not be shut off. The accident will be the subject of an inquiry by British Railways.’
With no Sunday edition of the
Cumberland Evening News, it appears that the working was on the Saturday night/Sunday morning, so the incident is believed to have occurred in the early hours of Sunday,
23 April. As is often the case, the facts differ slightly in another newspaper report, but here are a few additional nuggets from the Carlisle Journal of Friday, 28 April 1961, a weekly newspaper. It stated that the fireman was 38year-old Reg Pate and that he put on the brakes and when they didn’t work he ‘tried to put the engine into reverse’; and when this didn’t work ‘he jumped off ’. The time was 2.15am and in a house near to the rogue engine were Mrs Clara Bellingham and her children. She said, ‘The whole thing was like a nightmare. We were used to the noise of trains in the depot’ but ‘Then came the crash. I ran downstairs with the children after me. We could not see what had happened; the place was thick with steam.’
The report continues with comments from neighbour Miss Anne O’Hara, who was sitting knitting at the time! ‘We are all lucky to be alive. It was a near thing. There was a terrible crash, then a horrible noise. I ran into my kitchen to find it full of steam. At first I thought something in the house had exploded, then I saw the engine towering above me.’
The subsequent British Railways accident report has eluded us, but it is clear from an archived microfiche of the Monday newspaper report that the locomotive was a British Railways Standard ‘9F’ class 2-10-0, and it has also become apparent that the shed also suffered a ‘run-away’ back on 4 June 1881. In later steam days the ‘9Fs’ were common in Carlisle but that was not the case in April 1961, so given the newspaper comment in regard to the route, and the day, the locomotive in question is quite possibly the regular job for a mechanical-stoker fitted Saltley-allocated ‘9F’ – a Birmingham Water Orton to Carlisle fitted freight that was routed via the Settle & Carlisle line. At the time this used Nos 92165-67 and, of those, No 92167 did have an ‘out of course’ visit to Crewe Works in 1961, subsequent to a light casual repair in the January, but of course, if the errant locomotive had only superficial damage it may well have been attended to on a local shed.
Final thoughts
A major locomotive shed for the North Eastern Railway, certainly after the creation of the roundhouses post-1880, the depot that became known as London Road in LNER days only retained such a status for about 12 years post-grouping, and then saw demotion, a new role and, in regard to locomotive matters, a withering that finally ended with the 1963 closure of London Road goods yard. The story of the rundown and demise of London Road shed is perhaps all the more intriguing because it has yet to reveal everything. As ever, we would very much like to hear from you, via the editor, is you can further enrich this fascinating story.