Stirling Observer

More than two sides to the bin debate

-

Dear editor,

There has been much debate over bin collection­s in Stirling recently.

Both recent administra­tions bear responsibi­lity to where we are now, as the previous Labour/conservati­ve administra­tion changed the collection service that worked well for recycling without achieving efficiency savings.

This debate has been shaped as just having two views.

The recent changes are framed as either a disgrace or as the only solution.

The key message is that we must reduce, reuse (and there are many excellent examples of this in Stirling) and recycle more.

There is far too much cardboard and plastic involved in our purchases which then is disposed of in our bins.

So what is the best way to support the public in doing this?

It is by consultati­on and explanatio­n. and explanatio­n needed to get bin service working properly

The chief mistake by the council’s SNP/ Labour administra­tion in 2020 is that there was no public consultati­on prior to the decision to make the changes, although there was an all party group to discuss the waste service.

So what should happen now and is the new bin collection service workable?

The key question is does the new system encourage more recycling or are some people just taking their waste directly to the recycling centres instead of via the bins?

I believe the introducti­on of a threeweekl­y collection for a short period and then a four weekly collection would have increased recycling and had better public buy in.

The reality is I don’t see any future administra­tion having the majority to reverse the changes (Don’t make elections promises that is not in your power to keep).

The challenge now is to make this system work by offering support and maximise the ways that people can reduce, recycle and reuse.

The future of our planet depends on using its resources wisely.

Councillor Alasdair Tollemache

 ?? ?? Consultati­on
Consultati­on

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom