Stirling Observer

Infants taken into care not placed with their siblings

-

Only one in five infants taken into care in Scotland who had older brothers or sisters were initially placed with them, according to a new study involving University of Stirling academics.

The research, led by Lancaster University and funded by the Scottish Government, was published this week.

It found that although, on the whole, families were known to services before their birth, and thus their arrival was expected, most infants were not placed with their older brothers and sisters.

Two years later, only a third of children were living with a brother or sister.

The Promise, the report of the Independen­t Care Review set up by First Minister Nicola Sturgeon and published in 2020, states that where living with their families is not possible, children need to be placed with their brothers and sisters.

The research team was led by Dr Linda Cusworth, from Lancaster University, in partnershi­p with researcher­s at the University of Stirling, and the Scottish Children’s Reporter Administra­tion (SCRA).

The team analysed data for all 2,849 infants who entered the care system via the Children’s Hearing before they were a year old between 1 April, 2013 and 31 March, 2020, and looked in depth at the circumstan­ces of 70 of those children and their families.

Co-author Dr Helen Whincup, from the University of Stirling, said: “Our findings show that placing babies and infants with older brothers and sisters was the exception rather than the rule.

“This is despite the drive to keep brothers and sisters together and research which shows that early decisions about where, and with whom children are placed, can have huge consequenc­es for their relationsh­ips with their siblings.”

The study also explored the circumstan­ces of families where infants were removed, uncovering complex needs relating to poverty and housing problems, mental health, substance misuse, domestic abuse and offending histories.

Researcher­s also found that many of the parents were recorded as having difficult and disrupted childhoods themselves, with significan­t proportion­s having experience­d abuse or neglect. Over a third (37 per cent) of mothers and a quarter (24 per cent) of fathers were care experience­d.

Around a third of parents did not have any older children. But the study found that this was not the first child who had become looked after away from home for many of the parents.

Nine out of ten of the mothers known to have older children had at least one child previously removed, with one in five having had three or more children taken into care.

Although less informatio­n was recorded for fathers, over half (56 per cent) of those with older children were known to have had a previous child removed from their care.

Lead author Dr Linda Cusworth, from Lancaster University, said: “It is clear from our study that these families have multiple and complex needs. This emphasises the need for a range of early, sensitive and flexible support services to support parents, including those who are care experience­d, and those who have had a child previously removed from their care.”

 ?? ??
 ?? ?? Findings Dr Helen Whincup
Findings Dr Helen Whincup

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom