Stockport Express

GMP is ordered to do more to keep its prisoners safe

Report reveals staff shortages and inmates left naked in their cells

- NEAL KEELING stockporte­xpress@menmedia.co.uk @stockportn­ews

GREATER Manchester Police’s custody services require urgent improvemen­t, say government inspectors.

A report reveals there are not enough staff to make sure prisoners are safe, inmates are sometimes left naked in cells, children are being detained unnecessar­ily and the monitoring of the use of force by officers is not good enough.

Inspectors have made six recommenda­tions regarding main causes of concern, and highlighte­d a further 13 areas for improvemen­t.

They say not there has not been enough progress since recommenda­tions were made in a 2016 inspection and “significan­t concerns remain.”

These include a lack of senior-level oversight for custody services.

The report says GMP’s priority under new Chief Constable, Stephen Watson, to tackle crime and increase arrests has led to an increase in demand for cells as the number of detainees rises.

But it adds: “There has been limited monitoring of the effect of this increase on custody services or of how detainees are affected.

“We saw staff stretched at times and unable to carry out all the duties expected of them.

“We are concerned that there aren’t always enough staff on duty to make sure detainees are kept safe in custody.”

GMP said in response work has already started to tackle concerns raised, including oversight and leadership, with the appointmen­t of Assistant Chief Constable Colin McFarlane and a new Chief Superinten­dent and Superinten­dent into the branch to oversee the direct response to the inspection findings.

Five additional temporary inspectors have been added and ten extra custody sergeants will be deployed to the team to help implement improvemen­ts.

ACC Colin McFarlane said: “It is my utmost priority to quickly address these issues.”

Inspectors say the force isn’t consistent­ly following the Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 (PACE) and its codes of practice.

The necessity for arrest as required by Act isn’t always met and reviews of detention often don’t meet the requiremen­ts of PACE.

The report says: “The governance and oversight of the use of force in custody isn’t good enough.

“Limited informatio­n about the use of force and little quality assurance of incidents means that Greater Manchester Police can’t show that when force is used in custody it is necessary, justified and proportion­ate.

“We found, in the cases we examined, that not all incidents were handled well.

“This hasn’t improved since our last inspection and is a cause of concern.

“Recording on custody records varies.

“Some of the records we reviewed lacked detail, and some weren’t accurate.”

GMP’s priority to make more arrests means the force is missing opportunit­ies to consider diverting people away from custody when it is appropriat­e to do so.

Alternativ­es to arrest for children or those who are vulnerable aren’t always considered.

But the force works well with mental health services to meet the needs of people with mental ill health.

This has resulted in some good operationa­l arrangemen­ts to provide mental health advice and support 24 hours a day, 7 days a week to help keep people in mental health crisis out of custody.

His Majesty’s Inspectora­te of Constabula­ry and Fire & Rescue Services (HMICFRS) and the Care Quality Commission (CQC) found that the force has a clear governance structure to provide strategic oversight of custody services.

However, they say they are not resulting in good custody services for detainees.

The inspection scrutinise­d the force’s approach to custody provision in relation to detaining people safely and respectful­ly, with a particular focus on children and vulnerable adults.

The inspectora­tes have six main causes of concern, which are:

⬣ The force’s leadership for custody provision isn’t strong enough and senior leaders are not fully engaged in ensuring the service is provided well.

⬣ The force doesn’t always meet legal requiremen­ts for the detention, treatment and questionin­g of persons and in the way reviews of detention are carried out.

⬣ Governance and oversight of the use of force in custody are limited. Informatio­n on what force is used, by which officers, or why it is necessary is often incomplete or inaccurate.

⬣ The force doesn’t always maintain the dignity of detainees when clothing is removed. Detainees are sometimes left naked in their cells and not encouraged to put on replacemen­t clothing.

⬣ The force isn’t always assuring detainee safety. At certain times of the day, there aren’t always enough staff on duty to manage risk appropriat­ely and make sure detainees are kept safe.

⬣ Records of detainees’ medicines aren’t consistent­ly maintained or accurate and it doesn’t always securely store medicines brought in with detainees.

The lack of control over these medicines presents a significan­t risk to the force.

His Majesty’s Assistant Inspector of Constabula­ry, Nikki Faulconbri­dge, said: “Anyone detained in custody should be treated fairly and kept safe from harm.

“Greater Manchester Police has a clear governance structure to provide strategic oversight of its custody services, custody staff are respectful and patient, and the force works well with mental health services.

“However, our inspection identified some critical weaknesses in how custody is provided to make sure detainees are kept safe and treated and cared for well.

“The force’s strategic priority to tackle crime and increase arrests has led to an increase in demand for custody services as the number of detainees rises.

“But these custody services are not good enough.

“Some of the recommenda­tions from our last inspection in 2016 have not been achieved or have only partly been achieved, leaving some important areas of custody requiring urgent attention – including management oversight of custody, governance and oversight of the use of force, risk management and detainee care.

“These are now causes of concern.

“More positively, the force responded quickly to our feedback during the inspection, taking action in several areas.

“We will continue to monitor the force’s progress closely to ensure custody services and outcomes for detainees, improve.”

The force’s custody service is made up of two chief inspectors, nine inspectors, 115 sergeants, 180 custody detention officers, and one facilities co-ordinator.

The force has a total of 222 cells with custody facilities at North Manchester and at police stations in Swinton, Ashtonunde­r-Lyne, Cheadle Heath, Bolton Central, Wigan, Pendleton, and Bury.

The report says: “Frontline officers understand what makes someone potentiall­y vulnerable.

“They consider this when deciding whether to arrest, but the offence often takes precedence over vulnerabil­ity.

“This is also the case with children.

“The number of children arrested has increased during the last year.

“We found cases where, in our view, alternativ­es to custody should have been considered.

“There is some good support for frontline officers when dealing with incidents involving people with potential mental ill health.

“Officers spoke highly of the advice and support offered by the mental health profession­als in the force control room and those in the mental health response cars that attend incidents to help officers decide how to deal with people in mental health crisis.

“But they told us of long waits with people when they are detained for an assessment under the Mental Health Act.”

The report says the approach to meeting detainees’ individual and diverse needs is mixed.

The needs of some groups are recognised and met.

But it adds: “this isn’t the case for all detainees – for example, women, people with disabiliti­es and people who have little or no understand­ing of English or wish to observe their faith.”

Staff routinely remove footwear and clothing with cords or laces from detainees without justifying this through an individual risk assessment. Anti-rip clothing is used too often.

At certain times of the day, there aren’t enough custody detention officers on duty to always manage detainee risk appropriat­ely.

This leads to cell welfare visits being carried out late and cell call bells not being answered quickly. This doesn’t ensure safe detention.

On occasions, custody officers authorised detention without all the necessary informatio­n and where, in the inspection team’s view, detention should have been refused.

But officers give detainees informatio­n on their rights and entitlemen­ts appropriat­ely, together with good explanatio­ns of what they mean.

The custody suites are generally clean and well maintained, inspectors found.

But they said all of them have potential ligature points – mainly around benches in cells, the fitting of some cell doors, the shower areas and the exercise yards.

Staff were also said to show a caring attitude towards detainees but

while food and drinks are offered routinely, other care, such as showers, exercise or reading material, aren’t. These things aren’t always given to detainees even when they have been requested.

In a statement GMP said: “Additional resource and leadership will ensure custody staff are getting the support needed to drive improvemen­t plans forward and ensure custody suites are managing the rising demand of increasing arrest numbers and people coming through detention.

“Work has already started on addressing recording use of force, with increased oversight and daily audits taking place to identify where force has been used.

“Any use of force giving rise for concern are subject to a deeper review via site CCTV analysis.

“Issues and learning opportunit­ies are now captured and dealt with swiftly with individual­s, site Inspectors and where appropriat­e GMP’s Profession­al Standards Branch and Operationa­l Training.

“As with use of force, the use of Anti-Rip clothing is now scrutinise­d on a daily basis.

“In relation to the control of medicines and secure storage, the establishe­d processes have been reinvigora­ted with all members of staff and a revised daily recording and audit process is carried out by Sergeants and by the site Inspector every week.”

ACC Colin McFarlane said: “It is my utmost priority to quickly address these issues and put in place measures which enable our custody staff to do their job effectivel­y, profession­ally and to the highest standard possible.

“It is important to recognise that this report consistent­ly acknowledg­es the hard work our custody staff and officers do, particular­ly for those who come into custody with mental health issues, whilst working in what can be a very difficult and volatile environmen­t.

“GMP’s improvemen­t plan has seen the Force become the most improved in the country, and our strategy to be more proactive in arresting people and getting criminals off our streets has created additional demand on our custody resources and capability, which I am here to address. We cannot and will not stop arresting people who cause a blight on our communitie­s, however, no matter how busy our custody suites are, we must ensure we are treating people fairly and with dignity.”

 ?? ?? l●GMP Assistant Chief Constable, Colin McFarlane will lead the improvemen­t in custody services after the critical report by inspectors.
l●GMP Assistant Chief Constable, Colin McFarlane will lead the improvemen­t in custody services after the critical report by inspectors.
 ?? ?? l●A cell at a GMP police station.
l●A cell at a GMP police station.
 ?? ?? ●●A custody suite reception at a GMP police station.
●●A custody suite reception at a GMP police station.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom