Sunday Express

HEIR DEMANDS RETURN TOOK FROM PRINCE IN

- By Marco Giannangel­i DIPLOMATIC EDITOR

A GERMAN aristocrat whose grandfathe­r was involved in a plot to kill Hitler is hoping to have a 42,000-acre estate returned to his family by proving a key document was written in Nazi ink.

Prince Friedrich zu Solms-baruth was involved in a doomed plot to overthrow the Fuhrer, Operation Valkyrie, made famous in the Tom Cruise film of the same name.

His grandson, Prince Friedrich V, has been waging a legal battle against the German government and says that the family estate was taken by Himmler after the plot failed.

For 30 years German courts have insisted the lands were confiscate­d after 1945 by East Germany, for which there is no restitutio­n. And in September judges in Leipzig again upheld the view. This time, however, they ignored “incontrove­rtible proof” the lands were stolen by the Nazi regime – including ink analysis showing key documents were written by Nazis.

Friedrich also claims his family’s role in the plot and link to the estate has been airbrushed out of history in the town of

Baruth, 30 miles south of Berlin. Prince Friedrich III was already on the Gestapo’s watchlist before inviting Valkyrie members to his castle where he agreed to help Colonel Claus Schenk Graf von Stauffenbe­rg, the one-eyed and one-armed aristocrat who led the assassinat­ion plot.

Killing the Fuhrer was vital because soldiers of the Third Reich swore their oaths of allegiance­s in his name.

The plot – turned into a 2008 Hollywood blockbuste­r – failed. On July 20, 1944 von Stauffenbe­rg planted a bomb in a suitcase under a table in Hitler’s headquarte­rs, the “wolf’s lair”, in what is now Poland. The bomb exploded but Hitler escaped with little more than a burst eardrum.

Most conspirato­rs were rounded up and executed, including von Stauffenbe­rg, who faced a firing squad the following day.

Others were tortured and interrogat­ed in the dungeons of Prinz Albrecht Strasse prison then strung up with piano wire.

As Himmler’s personal prisoner, Prince Friedrich was only spared that fate because of his royal heritage.

Relatives included Queen Victoria’s granddaugh­ter, Princess Alice, as well as members of the Swedish and Danish royal families, and killing him may have deprived Hitler’s SS chief of his chance to pursue secret peace negotiatio­ns.

Since German reunificat­ion the family has argued that it was while a prisoner, who was tortured, that the noble was forced to hand over his estates to Himmler.

With the deeds missing, German authoritie­s preferred the explanatio­n that they had been confiscate­d by the East Germans in communist land reforms. That would mean they were not liable for restitutio­n.

But earlier this year Prince Friedrich V made two astonishin­g discoverie­s.

The first was an internal document written in 1942 by Himmler outlining how mandarins could secretly confiscate the lands of political prisoners and erase all traces so as not to be seen to be breaking Nazi law. Bureaucrat­s would painstakin­gly remove all traces with razor blades.

The second was a handwritte­n note referring directly to the destructio­n of the deeds to Solms-baruth’s estates.

More astonishin­g, the documents were part of what he calls a “deliberate­ly misfiled” archive containing 10,000 similar claims that the German state had seemingly decided to brush under the carpet.

“We uncovered a major cover-up by chance,” says Prince Friedrich. “We got a tip-off by someone in one of the archives that there was a restitutio­n archive, which was in the possession of the state. We were able to get into it and found at least 10,000

‘We got a tip-off and found at least 10,000 similar claims’

similar potential claims. Our file ought to have been handed to the court.this was not done despite the fact that the court was told all archives had been searched and nothing more was to be found. They sat on it for 30 years. We were hoodwinked. The real scandal was that this case file contained instructio­ns to destroy all deeds pertaining to his

properties.we snuck in a chemical ink analysis expert who took samples of this file and establishe­d from chemicals used that the ink used to write the destructio­n instructio­ns was manufactur­ed before May 1945.

“This gave us incontrove­rtible proof that the Nazis had taken possession of the property before East Germany even existed.

 ??  ??
 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom