Sunday Express

Just keep it short and snappy, 007...

-

THERE’S a play opening in London this week which is four hours long. I know someone who – having discovered this – has returned his tickets because a) he can’t face it and b) he’d miss his train home. I haven’t yet got round to seeing the film The Irishman, which I could watch on the telly, because much as I revere Robert De Niro, Al Pacino and Joe Pesci, I can’t be bothered with a movie that’s three and a half hours long. Not even from the comfort of my own sofa.

It’s not so much that I have the attention span of a goldfish, it’s more that most movies these days could benefit from being 20 minutes shorter. Less is more.

It’s said that the new James Bond film No Time To Die will be two hours and 54 minutes, possibly... aaagh... longer. Possibly much more than three hours, which allows plenty of Time To Die... of boredom.

Months ago we learnt that Fleabag’s Phoebe Waller-bridge had been brought in to titivate the script of this much delayed film – which will be Daniel Craig’s last shout as 007.

A mole close to the production said: “The script was constantly being added to. The plot was changing as we went along. Phoebe was adding in pages. It was chaotic. They just kept shooting more and more. Everyone is determined this will be the best Bond ever, so they kept adding scenes.”

Alfred Hitchcock, who knew a thing or two about movies, said that the length of a film “should be directly related to the endurance of a human bladder”. But great film-makers are also guilty of making bum-numbing marathons.

In 1982 Ingmar Bergman directed Fanny And Alexander which lasted a whopping 312 minutes, one of the longest films ever made. Staggering out of the cinema, I remember one audience member saying: “If only it could have been Fanny or Alexander, but not both.”

In the 1980s that was the exception but now super-long movies are commonplac­e. Bond films have become longer and longer. The early ones with Sean Connery – Dr No, From Russia With Love and Goldfinger – were all under two hours. When Roger Moore took over they usually came in at just over two hours.

But Skyfall and Spectre – with Daniel Craig as 007 – were edging towards two and a half hours.

It’s understand­able that producers want to give customers their money’s worth (especially as you can binge on a box-set at home for hours) and making a film very long gives a sense of occasion, but it also can make it feel like an endurance test.

To ensure that audiences had a good night out, there used to be B-movies, playing along with the main feature as a double bill. The economics of movie-making doesn’t allow for that now. More’s the pity.

Here’s hoping we don’t have to be shaken and stirred – awake – when the credits on the new Bond film roll.

A FRIEND emails to tell me he tried out one of those online health questionna­ires which tells you how long you can expect to live. Having filled in all the weight, height and do-you-smoke questions he clicked on “get your results” and was told he could expect to live to the age of 78. “The only problem with this,” he wrote, “is that I’m 85 next birthday.”

IT’S BEEN said, reasonably, that we can no longer blame Europe for anything any longer, not now we’ve left the Eu.what a wonderful irony that in the same week, an unexploded Secondworl­dwar bomb was unearthed at a building site in London’s Soho. I think we can still confidentl­y point the finger of blame for that.

 ?? Picture: FRANCO ORIGLIA/GETTY ?? TIME’S NO OBJECT: Daniel Craig and Ana de Armas in No Time To Die
Picture: FRANCO ORIGLIA/GETTY TIME’S NO OBJECT: Daniel Craig and Ana de Armas in No Time To Die

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom