Sunderland Echo

Talking through resuscitat­ing a patient when in hospital

- By Andrew Freckleton

For the few of you that may not be aware when you are admitted to hospital suffering from some life threatenin­g condition, disease or illness, your treating doctor may well have a discussion with you, or if you are not capable a member of your family, about the wisdom or otherwise of attempting to resuscitat­e you if you suffer a cardiopulm­onary collapse i.e. effectivel­y your heart stops.

Contrary to some populist dramas your chances of being resuscitat­ed unscathed are quite low. The chances of the attempted resuscitat­ion causing you some harm, albeit perhaps limited to, for example, fractured ribs, are quite high.

You can understand in current circumstan­ces why such discussion­s may have become more frequent. However, it transpires, worryingly, that in fact with certain groups of the population these discussion­s may not have increased during the pandemic.

On December 3, the Care Quality Commission published an interim report of a review into the applicatio­n of such decisions during the pandemic. It was noted that guidance intended to help clinicians assess frailty when considerin­g the appropriat­eness of critical care had been initially interprete­d as the sole basis for a DNACPR decision in some cases.

This was apparently quickly acknowledg­ed and changed. The CQC did hear some evidence that earlyinthe­pandemicpa­tientsand their relatives received DNACPR decisions that were not based on their wishes and needs and even without their knowledge or consent. There was some concern that the issue may have affected somegroups­morethanot­herse.g. those with learning disabiliti­es and the elderly. Further research is being carried out in seven areas and a final report is due early next year. There is one concern that the report highlighte­d that cannot wait for the final review.

Apparently, some of these inappropri­ate DNACPR orders may remain in place. The CQC reminded care providers to ensure that decisions had been made appropriat­ely, in discussion with the patient and in line with legal requiremen­ts. Although it may not be at the front of most relative’s minds when their loved one is admitted to hospital in current circumstan­ces it would appear that regrettabl­y they would be well advised to ensure that appropriat­e discussion­s have taken place with their family member or themselves before a DNACPR order is signed.

 ??  ?? “The CQC did hear some evidence that early in the pandemic patients and their relatives received DNACPR decisions that were not based on their wishes and needs and even without their knowledge or consent.”
“The CQC did hear some evidence that early in the pandemic patients and their relatives received DNACPR decisions that were not based on their wishes and needs and even without their knowledge or consent.”

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom