Sunderland Echo

Plans for 'horse exercise track' on green belt land is refused

- Chris Binding chris.binding@jpimedia.co.uk @sunderland­echo

Plans to create a 'horse exercise track' on green belt land on the outskirts of Houghton have been knocked back by city councillor­s.

Earlier in January, a planning applicatio­n was validated by Sunderland City Council for land south of High Lane and northwest of the A690 at Stoneygate, in the Copt Hill ward.

The plans from Ajay Brickworks included forming a horse track through partial re-levelling of land and associated fencing and tree planting to screen the site.

According to a report prepared for councillor­s this week, the applicatio­n was partly retrospect­ive as it was submitted after some of the work had already taken place.

During were submitted on behalf of Over the Hill Farm residents, who share the proposed access with the developmen­t.

Concerns included the impact on the green belt, the “highly visible” nature of the site and "further harm" from increased activity.

One object or also suggested that the developmen­t could be used for commercial ‘harness racing/training’- which usually involves horses pulling twowheeled carts- rather than an exercise track for personal use.

The plans were presented for decision at the council’s Planning and Highways( West) Committee on Tuesday at Sunderland Civic Centre.

Planning officers recommende­d the applicatio­n for they said it represente­d an “inappropri­ate form of developmen­t within the green belt.”

A report presented to councillor­s added the plans did not demonstrat­e “very special circumstan­ces" needed to outweigh harm to the green belt and would have a "detrimenta­l impact on the openness, character and appearance of the countrysid­e."

Copt Hill ward councillor Kevin Johnston said the works at the site had impacted on nearby residents.

He told the planning meeting: “This applicatio­n from the very start has been a prime example of how an applicant should not approach or conduct themselves with any planning applicatio­ns in the city to the detriment of this council and the residents who have had to suffer.

"To be honest, [the applicant] should really be coming here tonight with an apology, not seeking planning approval."

Planning agent Dr Anton Lang said the applicant didn’t know that re-grading the land to form a horse track needed planning permission, with the applicant apologisin­g for the applicatio­n being partly retrospect­ive.

Council planners said that the main issue with the applicatio­n was that it constitute­d ‘operationa­l developmen­t’ in the green belt.

Following discussion, councillor son the committee voted inline with a planning officer' s recommenda­tion to refuse the developmen­t.

Cllr Graeme Miller, vice chair of the Planning and Highways (West) Committee, said: "At the end of the day, we just cannot accept retrospect­ive applicatio­ns on green belt.

"It's entirely inappropri­ate especially when there is no special circumstan­ce that would alleviate the, quite rightly,strong protection­s that go in on the green belt on issues like this. If we open the door on this, what will happen next that will then have to be given considerat­ion?”

Council planners confirmed "appropriat­e measures would be taken outside the meeting" to restore the land to its former condition.

 ??  ?? The area of the retrospect­ive applicatio­n. Picture Google Maps
The area of the retrospect­ive applicatio­n. Picture Google Maps
 ??  ?? Sunderland Civic Centre.
Sunderland Civic Centre.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom