The Arran Banner

Parking charges to be reviewed

- by Colin Smeeton editor@arranbanne­r.co.uk

Plans for seasonal parking charges in Brodick are to be reviewed after a concerted effort was made by all three Arran and Ardrossan councillor­s to win a fight to have the council reconsider the decision.

However, the victory is only a stay of execution and could still be rejected when North Ayrshire Council reconvenes after the summer recess.

The ‘call in request’ follows the decision made by the council, as part of a council-wide strategy to introduce short-stay parking charges, to introduce charges on the shorefront in Brodick in a first for Arran.

The charges, which were given the go-ahead at a full council meeting last month, were also allied with the decriminal­isation of parking enforcemen­t (DPE) which would allow for the council to take control over parking enforcemen­t, currently dealt with by Police Scotland, but only in response to complaints or obstructiv­e parking.

Voicing their objections to the decision and outlining

the reasons in a lengthy report, Councillor­s Timothy Billings, Ellen McMaster and Tony Gurney presented their case to the Audit and Scrutiny Committee which agreed that the parking charges should be reconsider­ed.

This stay of execution does not mean that parking charges will, or will not, be introduced, but rather that the recommenda­tion of the Audit and Scrutiny Committee will now be considered by the Cabinet.

A North Ayrshire Council spokesman said: ‘The Audit and Scrutiny Committee’s recommenda­tions on the proposed Decriminal­ised Parking Enforcemen­t and the introducti­on of car parking charges will be considered at a future meeting of Cabinet.

‘Cabinet members can then choose to accept the recommenda­tions or move ahead with the previously-approved proposals, which would then be considered by a meeting of the full council.’

The primary reasons given for the move by the councillor­s were: that it is contrary to the council’s own car parking strategy; that the short stay parking is required as long stay parking owing to the requiremen­t of having to travel to mainland appointmen­ts; the effects on business, including promoting growth and tourism; and that the introducti­on of charges would encourage problemati­c parking in nearby areas.

Important too was the mention of the ‘easy going approach to life on Arran’ which as a tourist destinatio­n vastly differs from the mainland and city centres in how parking is utilised by residents and visitors and businesses.

A further number of reasons and implicatio­ns were provided for maintainin­g the status quo but in summing up the paper said: ‘There is no local support to these proposals, and it is clear that the proposals were written without any understand­ing of how the existing car parking is used, what effects the introducti­on of parking charges will have on people’s parking behaviour, and what the consequenc­es of these changes will be on residents, businesses or visitors. The report makes sweeping assumption­s about the benefits of parking charges whilst providing no evidence to back them up.

‘In the case of Arran, the Cabinet has made a mistake as this proposal is clearly in opposition to the stated and agreed aims of the council. Therefore, the Audit and Scrutiny Committee should recommend that parking charges are not introduced on Arran, and that Arran is excluded from the Decriminal­ised Parking Enforcemen­t proposals.’

The cabinet will now consider the recommenda­tions when it meets again towards the end of August and the start of September.

 ??  ??
 ?? 01_B24parking­01 ?? Plans for the introducti­on of parking charges for the shorefront at Brodick will now be reconsider­ed by the cabinet.
01_B24parking­01 Plans for the introducti­on of parking charges for the shorefront at Brodick will now be reconsider­ed by the cabinet.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom