The Chronicle

TYNE TO PAY UP?

CHARGES CONSIDERED AS PART OF A SOLUTION TO POLLUTION

- By DANIEL HOLLAND Local democracy reporter daniel.holland@reachplc.com

Car drivers could face £1.70 charge to cross river in pollution control move

Alternativ­e council plan could see £12.50 daily charge for cars with worst emissions

TOLLS could be placed on three bridges over the Tyne in order to put an end to the area’s air pollution “crisis”.

Council bosses have finally revealed their proposals to cut emissions on Tyneside, and among the options being considered is a toll on the Tyne, Swing, and Redheugh bridges that would affect all drivers apart from buses and taxis, possibly with fees of £1.70 for cars and £3.40 for lorries.

If that is not implemente­d, the alternativ­e would be a wider Clean Air Zone (CAZ), in which high-polluting vehicles could be charged £12.50 a day, or £50 for lorries, buses and coaches.

Newcastle, Gateshead and North Tyneside councils have been ordered by the Government to clean up the air in pollution hotspots across Tyneside by 2021 – including the Coast Road and the Central Motorway.

While Government has told the councils they must consider a CAZ, local leaders say such a charge would disproport­ionately hit poorer residents, be “profoundly damaging to our economy” and would not bring emissions levels to within legal limits.

That is why the option of a bridges toll has now been proposed, though the councils have not yet completed modelling to see if that would be sufficient­ly effective in reducing traffic levels.

A public consultati­on on the two options will be launched in March, while additional measures could also include banning lorries, buses, and taxis that do not meet minimum emissions standards from entering Newcastle city centre at certain times. The consultati­on will also ask about possible restrictio­ns to cut traffic on the Central Motorway.

Coun Nick Forbes, Labour leader of Newcastle City Council, said: “This is a public health crisis that has been several decades in the making.

“As councils we are not prepared to stand by and let people continue to die as a result of poor air quality.

“We have a responsibi­lity both legally and morally to do something about it. Doing nothing is not an option.”

Under a system of tolls, charges would apply to all lorries, vans and cars regardless of their emissions – but buses and taxis would be exempt from the tolls, which are in line with those charged at the Tyne Tunnel. In the CAZ – which could include the centres of Newcastle and Gateshead, stretching up to Gosforth and down part of the Coast Road – a £50 daily charge could be imposed on lorries, buses and taxis and £12.50 for vans, taxis and older cars.

Coun Forbes added: “We have not got a preferred option at the moment, unlike the Government who are pushing the CAZ.

“The real problem I have with the CAZ idea is that it penalises the poorest motorists from the most disadvanta­ged background­s – people driving the oldest vehicles. If you can afford a brand new car then, in effect, you get no financial penalty. Tolls feels more equitable.

“Our modelling shows that the introducti­on of tolls on the bridges or a CAZ would have an impact on reducing traffic flows. Whether it would meet the

As councils we are not prepared to stand by and let people continue to die as a result of poor air quality

government targets for improved air quality is still an open question.”

Coun Forbes and fellow leaders from across Gateshead and North Tyneside have urged the Government to take other action to cut pollution – such as investing more in public transport and introducin­g a £1.5bn national scrappage scheme for older diesel vehicles.

Political opponents claim the councils are “failing badly on transport”.

Newcastle councillor Greg Stone, transport spokesman for the city’s Lib Dem opposition, added: “It is remarkable that a few weeks ago the council’s Labour leadership were announcing they did not support clean air charging zones and daily charges to drive in the city centre and key routes like the Coast Road and stated that they did not feel such steps would be effective.

“Clearly they have made a screeching U-turn and we suspect that they have been read the riot act by Government who have made it clear to them that doing nothing is not an option. Residents of my ward alongside the Coast Road want to see action taken on pollution levels which breach national limits and affect public health, but there will be public incredulit­y that the council wants them to pay £12.50 a day to drive on the Coast Road.

“Nor will there be huge enthusiasm for bridge crossing tolls.

“The Lib Dem Opposition is willing to look seriously at other proposals including a low emission zone in the city centre core within the area of the ‘bus loop’ and associated measures to improve public transport such as switching to clean technology buses and taxis, more park and ride provision, and to encourage scrappage of high emissions diesels in favour of low emission vehicles.”

The public consultati­on will run from March 6 to May 2019, while the various plans being put forward will be considered at cabinet meetings of all three councils next week.

 ??  ??
 ??  ??
 ??  ?? Newcastle city council leader Nick Forbes talking to the media at the air quality proposal meeting
Newcastle city council leader Nick Forbes talking to the media at the air quality proposal meeting
 ??  ?? Drivers crossing three bridges over the Tyne could face paying a toll under new proposals
Drivers crossing three bridges over the Tyne could face paying a toll under new proposals

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom