BIG MATCH RATINGS
NEWCASTLE UNITED v CRYSTAL PALACE
LEE RYDER rates the Magpies in their 2-0 defeat at Selhurst Park
Martin Dubravka ................. 7
Left totally exposed and was furious with his defence as they crumbled to their knees..
Jacob Murphy ..................... 4
A tough night. Struggled to cope with the dual roles and did not manage a cross.
Emil Krafth 4 ...................... 4
Unable to cope with Palace’s lively attack. A gift of clearance to help hand Palace the lead.
Fabian Schar ....................... 6
Started off in relative control with a couple of good blocks. Slipping and sliding after the break. And lost his cool with Andersen.
Dan Burn ............................ 6
An assured showing in the first half but struggled badly after the break.
Elliot Anderson ................... 7
One of the better performers on the night. Looked far from happy with his team-mates as Palace picked holes.
Sean Longstaff .................... 6
Had a penalty shout after going over in the box. Started OK but fizzled out before being taken off.
Bruno Guimaraes ................. 6
A couple of decent passes in the first half. When Newcastle needed something after the break he couldn’t deliver.
Anthonygordon .................. 6
At least offered a threat.
Harvey Barnes .................... 4
His night did not get off to a good start after failing to make the most of an opening. And it went downhill from there.
Alexander Isak .................... 7
Looked more lively after break.
Substitutes
CALLUM WILSON ........................ 5
(For Barnes, 65 min). No impact. Just seven touches in all.
LEWIS HALL ................................. 6
(For Murphy, 65 min). Caused a few problems..
MATT RITCHIE .......................... N/A
(For Anderson, 90 min).
JOE WHITE ................................ N/A
(For Longstaff, 90 min).
Not used: Dummett, Karius, Livramento, Murphy, Parkinson.
Booked: Gordon, Longstaff, Anderson.
Attendance: 25,002.
Referee: Thomas Bramall (Sheffield)
■■ Subs must play 15 minutes to receive a mark.
■■ Due to print deadlines, we were unable to publish ratings in yesterday’s paper.