The Courier & Advertiser (Angus and Dundee)

Angus Council’s funding slashed

Research shows steady cash cut over years

- GARETH MCPHERSON POLITICAL EDITOR

Angus Council’s funding has been slashed by £105 for each resident over the last five years, independen­t researcher­s have found.

Kirstene Hair, the Tory MP for Angus, said the Scottish Parliament Informatio­n Service (Spice) analysis reveals the “shocking extent of SNP cuts” to councils in Tayside.

Across Scotland, the local government budget for day-to-day spending reduced by 7.1% between 2013-14 and 2018-19, compared with 1.8% for Scotland’s entire budget, Spice reported.

In a sign of the impact of the cuts, Angus Council is planning to reduce its workforce by 800.

The Scottish Government said the analysis does not include some of the additional cash it is giving councils for social care and closing the attainment gap, which helps provide councils with an extra £250 million in spending power on last year.

Council funding has been slashed by up to £100 a head in Tayside and Fife in five years, according to Holyrood researcher­s.

The Scottish Parliament informatio­n service found that core funds for local authoritie­s have decreased at a “much faster rate” than for the Scottish budget as a whole.

The biggest funding drop in Courier Country was in Perth and Kinross, where the real-terms reduction was £130 per person between 2013-14 and 2018-19.

That compares with Fife (-£106), Dundee (-£78) and Angus (-£105).

Alexander Stewart, the Perthshire MSP for the Tories, said: “These figures prove that despite all their protestati­ons, the SNP has comprehens­ively underresou­rced local government.

“As Spice (the Scottish Parliament Informatio­n Centre) has laid bare, the SNP destructio­n of local government funding has taken place despite their own increasing budget,” Mr Stewart added.

There were wide variations across the country, ranging from a £6 per person

“The Scottish Government claim they are treating local government fairly, but this is yet another report that shows this isn’t the case. DAVID ROSS

reduction in Orkney to a £504 cut in Orkney.

The report stressed that changes to funding per head “represent both changes to population and changes to funding, so should not be attributed solely to one or the other”.

In the five years since 2013-14 the local government grant for day-to-day spending from Scottish ministers has fallen £745 million in real terms, or 7.1%.

Over the same period the Scottish Government’s revenue budget has fallen by £547m, which amounts to 1.8%.

David Ross, the Labour co-leader of Fife Council, said the financial pressure on councils is even worse than the report suggests because of the rise in demand for services such as social care.

“The Scottish Government claim they are treating local government fairly, but this is yet another report that shows this isn’t the case and that local councils are being expected to take far more than their fair share of cuts,” Mr Ross said.

The Scottish Government insist they have protected the spending power of councils by giving cash directly to head teachers, merging health and social care budgets and giving councillor­s the freedom to raise council tax.

A government spokesman said: “These figures exclude a number of important, additional funding sources, including £355 million for health and social care and £150 million of funding that is provided outwith the core settlement, but which benefits local government.

“When those are included, there has been a slight decrease of just 0.8% between 2013 and 2019, compared to a 1.8% cut to the Scottish Government revenue budget over the same period.”

 ?? Picture: Kim Cessford. ?? Figures show Perth and Kinross had the biggest funding drop in Courier Country.
Picture: Kim Cessford. Figures show Perth and Kinross had the biggest funding drop in Courier Country.
 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom