No truth in claims of bias

Sir, – There have been many complaints of late that the BBC is biased and that much of the Scottish press sides with the Union.

However, this reading of the situation is flawed.

What independence supporters fail to understand is that there is another side to the debate that needs a voice, much to the displeasure of the nationalists.

This is what the BBC and press do in a democratic society.

In reference to the marching, it is many of the same people going to these events with their painted faces, slogans and flags.

Do these people really think they can bully people into submission? All they are achieving is hardening the resolve of people they are trying to coerce.

I would not agree with Kenny Macaskill on too many things but he is absolutely right, there needs to be less marching and more engagement if you wish to persuade those who disagree with your message.

Unfortunately, many would be unable to articulate their vision for an independent Scotland, other than the usual grievance and division arguments, hence flags and marching.

James Y Lorimer. Kenmuir,

Main Street, Luthermuir.

“

There are very serious issues to discuss about Islam and being a bit rude about an admittedly extreme form of attire doesn’t help address them, though it might help puncture the protective membrane of political correctness which protects Islam from criticism

severely restricted diet.

Tunnocks and Walkers are two brands famously under nationalist food police scrutiny.

The list is almost endless of businesses foolish enough to suggest Scotland is in the UK, or that haven’t plastered their packaging with Saltires – meaning they are obviously Westminster lackeys.

Remember back in 2014 when some High Street supermarkets warned an independent Scotland’s food prices could rise?

True separatists must surely boycott most supermarkets too.

I look forward to seeing only svelte All Under One Banner marchers in future. Martin Redfern. Woodcroft Road, Edinburgh. rude about an admittedly extreme form of attire doesn’t help address them, though it might help puncture the protective membrane of political correctness which protects Islam from criticism.

As one would expect from an ardent feminist, Ms Davidson states that men shouldn’t make weeping statements about what women wear.

Never mind the logic, just look at the gender.

Is a man not able to make a judgment on the desirability or otherwise of the burka and the philosophy behind it, just because he is a man?

Next from her rhetorical quiver comes a line so weak that it would draw scorn in a school debating competition.

Apparently, criticising the burka is like criticising Christians wearing crucifixes.

If Ms Davidson can’t differentiate between a subtle item of jewellery and the obscuring of the whole body and face, well, I give up.

Richard Lucas. Leader of the Scottish Family Party,

272 Bath Street, Glasgow.