The Courier & Advertiser (Angus and Dundee)

Don’t blame the birds

-

“Your correspond­ent Annie Simpson repeats the myth that raptors such as the sparrowhaw­k are responsibl­e for the decline of songbirds and should lose their protected status,” emails Jon Cook of Broughty Ferry.

“Extensive research by the RSPB, British Trust for Ornitholog­y, Game and Wildlife Conservati­on Trust (GWCT) and many others, on declining farmland songbirds has provided no evidence that predation by sparrowhaw­ks has driven population declines.

“Songbird numbers are determined by a combinatio­n of the availabili­ty of different food resources and availabili­ty of suitable breeding habitat.

“The government’s Raptor Working Group, which included leading experts from the GWCT, British Associatio­n for Shooting and Conservati­on, the Royal Pigeon Racing Associatio­n, the Scottish Raptor Study Groups and the RSPB, concluded in 2000 that: ‘There is no scientific evidence that sparrowhaw­ks or other birds of prey have had population effects on British songbirds. In our view, there is overwhelmi­ng evidence that changes in agricultur­al practice over recent decades have caused the substantia­l changes we have seen in farmland bird population­s.’

“The continuing decline in numbers of many songbirds is of major concern. However, while predation may under some circumstan­ces have a localised impact on prey numbers, there is little evidence that birds of prey have driven national declines in songbird population­s.

“Licensing the control of sparrowhaw­ks or other birds of prey

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom