Target ‘reckless’ cyclists

Sir, –With all due respect to Police Scotland, their latest wheeze – life-like cut-out bobbies with speed cameras – is clever, especially if they move them around to different hot spots. So may I suggest it could release more officers for, amongst other duties, a crackdown on reckless cyclists?

Cycling is, rightly, increasingly popular, and has been boosted by the pandemic.

But as road traffic returns to normal it will – given the severe limitations of our narrow streets and pavements – return to being a scary business for both cyclist and motorist.

No doubt local authorities are now trying to introduce safer “lane separation” etc. But simple rules will make cycling safer for all concerned.

These would require: 1 A high-viz waistcoat, ‘bandolier’ or some such, 2 efficient lights, 3 a ‘bell’ or other warning device, 4 a helmet is obviously a “no-brainer” when sharing a road with motorised traffic, but may have to be “legally”, optional.

Such rules are easily enforced – an initial warning by a (real, not plywood) police officer, followed by a fine for a repeat offence will quickly concentrate minds.

While at it, the officer (and traffic wardens should be empowered too) can check brake lights, bell etc actually work.

It is unfair and unreasonable of cyclists to put the onus for avoiding a collision entirely on drivers, and pedestrians, especially when so many of them perversely, dress in dark clothing with no lights.

If the Scottish Parliament does not have the powers to introduce or enforce such legislation, that is absurd. If they do, let’s show some initiative and get on with it.

Lives can be saved. David Roche. 6 Conachar Court, Perth.