The Courier & Advertiser (Angus and Dundee)

‘Plastic waste isn’t your fault, that’s just what big business wants you to think’

- James Mackenzie

Four years ago, Sir David Attenborou­gh’s Blue Planet II shone a spotlight on plastic in our oceans. From July next year, the deposit return system I helped campaign for will reduce the number of plastic bottles Scotland puts into the seas.

But almost no other change has been made since the programme aired.

So whose responsibi­lity is plastic waste and pollution anyway? To oversimpli­fy matters, there are three main candidates: the public, businesses, and government­s.

The case for the prosecutio­n of the public is as follows – we choose the over-packaged items off the shelves or off the websites. It’s therefore up to us to exercise consumer power and pick more sustainabl­e products, and we should do what we can to recycle. Businesses will then be forced to improve their ways.

But, business makes all the plastics that end up in our oceans and in the guts of everything from plankton to you and me. And they choose what goes on the shelf, so let’s focus on them.

Protests outside their headquarte­rs do have an impact, and they can be great fun too. But persuading a single business to change won’t stick if another less reputation-sensitive business can just step in.

Whether or not companies have to follow common standards is of course a matter for government­s and parliament­s. Government­s regulate the corporatio­ns who produce and sell plastics, just as they set the rules for oil exploratio­n. That’s where the decisions are really made.

Who to hold responsibl­e for our ongoing environmen­tal disasters isn’t some weary thought exercise, though. It’s an area where large amounts of money have been spent over decades on a single aim. To make you feel like it’s your fault.

This project began 50 years ago, just as environmen­tal awareness began to go mainstream.

The first ever Earth Day was marked in the US in March 1970, just as the first bottle bills passed, using 5¢ deposits to bring back empties for recycling.

A year later an organisati­on called Keep America Beautiful put out an ad known as the crying Indian, featuring an Italianame­rican actor dressed in a stereotypi­cal native headdress.

He canoes down a trash-strewn river into a polluted harbour. A car driver throws a bag of rubbish at his feet, and the famous tear rolls down his face. The punchline? “People start pollution. People can stop it.”

You’re meant to think it’s nothing to do with the packaging companies who set up Keep America Beautiful, of course, and unrelated to their burning desire not to be regulated.

Like their counterpar­ts elsewhere, they redefined blaming the public as “education”, and they explicitly lobbied against bottle bills.

It’s the exact same trick BP used in 2004 when it produced the world’s first carbon footprint calculator.

Now you can work out exactly how much climate change is your responsibi­lity, not theirs.

So what should government­s be doing about plastics? The answer is a principle known somewhat wonkishly as “extended producer responsibi­lity”.

Whether product or packaging, if you make it, you’re responsibl­e for it at the end of its life.

This already applies to some electrical products, and it’s coming for drinks cans and bottles through deposit return.

Our taxes pay for low-grade recycling, incinerati­on, and avoidable street cleaning.

The alternativ­e, the world we currently live in, is zero producer responsibi­lity.

It goes hand in hand with efforts to blame us – even though our taxes pay for low-grade recycling, incinerati­on, and avoidable street cleaning.

It takes a lot of cognitive dissonance to stand in any supermarke­t and think a ban on plastic straws (which can be a medical device for disabled people) is the answer.

Almost everything in sight is wrapped in a layer of plastic, or more, and on the back it always says “film: not currently recycled”.

Supermarke­ts could very easily be selling coleslaw or bacon in standard sterile reusable packaging and taking the empties back.

Refilling laundry liquid bottles is currently a niche way to shop, but supermarke­ts could be offering it as standard.

The pandemic could have been a perfect time to change food delivery forever. Regulate for a small range of standard washable container sizes, charge a deposit on them, and then credit the customer for every one returned.

Plastic waste is not our fault. Don’t let them blame you for the world we live in.

Say no to the guilt. It’s designed to demoralise. Instead, write a fierce letter to the supermarke­ts and the manufactur­ers, or join one of the many good organisati­ons which pressure them on our behalf. Urge your politician­s to act too.

There’s a much-delayed circular economy bill coming. But in the last Holyrood session the SNP published a draft which included no actual circular economy measures.

Perhaps the next version could actually deliver?

That is, in part, in your hands. You have power as a citizen, not a “consumer”. Use it.

The pandemic could have been a perfect time to change food delivery forever

 ??  ??
 ??  ?? POLLUTION: The problem of waste in our oceans can lead to turtles eating plastic bags, mistaking them for jellyfish.
POLLUTION: The problem of waste in our oceans can lead to turtles eating plastic bags, mistaking them for jellyfish.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom