The Courier & Advertiser (Angus and Dundee)

Compensati­on denied for pardoned miners

- TOM EDEN

Miners who are pardoned for historic conviction­s linked to strikes should not receive compensati­on from the Scottish Government, the justice secretary has said.

Keith Brown rebuffed calls for the Scottish Government to consider paying compensati­on as part of its plans to pardon miners convicted over strike action in the 1980s.

Challenged by former Scottish Labour leader Richard Leonard about whether compensati­on should be paid for the “injustices that were perpetrate­d on the miners, their communitie­s, but also on their families”, Mr Brown said it was an issue for Westminste­r.

He stressed that there is “very little surviving evidence from police and court records” from the time, so the Scottish Government was proposing a collective pardon for all those who qualify.

Mr Brown argued that trying to introduce a compensati­on scheme could delay miners from being pardoned, was not within the Scottish Government’s powers and it was the UK Government who had responsibi­lity for policing and the justice system at the time.

The Scottish Government is planning to pardon living and dead coal workers convicted of certain offences during the miners’ strike of 1984-85 as they attempted to prevent colliery closures by Margaret Thatcher’s Conservati­ve government.

Mr Brown said the collective pardon was to “recognise the disproport­ionate impact

felt by those miners as a result of taking part in the strike, to restore dignity to them and to help the mining communitie­s heal old wounds”.

Criteria for pardoning include conviction­s for offences such as breach of the peace, breaches of bail conditions or obstructio­n that were allegedly committed on the picket lines or demonstrat­ions in support of miners, as well as while travelling to or from those gatherings.

Giving evidence to Holyrood’s equalities committee, Mr Brown told MSPS pardons would not formally quash conviction­s or give people any further rights or entitlemen­ts and said: “I am clear that the bill should not cast any doubt on decisions made by the judiciary at the time or seek to place blame on any individual or group of individual­s.”

He added: “The conditions of the pardon recognise miners and police officers found themselves in extremely challengin­g situations where relationsh­ips came under unpreceden­ted strain.

“Miners who took part in industrial action did so to protect their jobs, their way of life and the communitie­s.

“Police officers were only exercising their duty to uphold the law and in circumstan­ces and on a scale which had never encountere­d before.

“The pardon will apply both to living people and posthumous­ly given the passage of time since the strike.”

Responding to SNP MSP Fulton Macgregor, who said he was “very much in favour of compensati­on” but now believed it should not be considered alongside the bill to pardon miners, Mr Brown argued there would have to be a “much more stringent process” than is proposed for pardoning people.

“It also runs the risk of the bill moving away from its intended symbolic effect, into the territory of questionin­g decisions by the judiciary at the time,” Mr Brown added.

 ?? ?? INDUSTRIAL ACTION: The Scottish Government has said any question of compensati­on alongside its pardon scheme was an issue for Westminste­r.
INDUSTRIAL ACTION: The Scottish Government has said any question of compensati­on alongside its pardon scheme was an issue for Westminste­r.
 ?? ?? Keith Brown.
Keith Brown.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom