The Courier & Advertiser (Angus and Dundee)

Tax changes can revive tenant farming sector

- Christophe­r Nicholson ■ Christophe­r Nicholson is Scottish Tenant Farmers Associatio­n chairman.

The publicatio­n of the Scottish Land Commission’s “Advice to Scottish Ministers on Land Reform and Taxation” last month outlined the steps needed to increase the role of land values in the country’s tax base and support the delivery of the Scottish Government’s land policies.

Land taxes as an idea are not new – economists have described land value tax as “the least bad tax”, because unlike other taxes it does not discourage economic activity or developmen­t.

More recently, in the lead-up to the Land Reform (Scotland) Act 2016, both the Agricultur­al Holdings Legislatio­n Review Group and Land Reform Review Group included advice on taxes relating to land.

The land commission’s recent report builds on this, covering not just land and property-related tax but also our wider tax framework.

Looking at the tenant farming sector, there are two significan­t hurdles to the letting of land, both of which could be addressed by changes to the current fiscal framework.

The first is our current fiscal framework itself.

The reliefs available for inheritanc­e tax and capital gains tax all act against the letting of land and encourage even the largest landowners to farm inhand instead of creating new leases.

Similarly, income from let land is treated for income tax purposes as investment income rather than trading income, putting landowners who let land at a disadvanta­ge.

This is a massive deterrent to the renewal and creation of farm leases, with tenants not having leases renewed by landlords who are legitimate­ly seeking to mitigate future tax risks.

When land is let we would like to see long-term leases, but our land and business transactio­n tax (LBTT) acts as a disincenti­ve to this.

From all angles our fiscal framework appears stacked against the sensible letting of land.

The second obstacle is a relatively new one – the green investors, or “green lairds”, seeking to buy large tracts of Scottish land for tree planting or rewilding.

These are usually commercial interests looking to offset their carbon emissions or seeking to benefit from carbon trading.

Over the last few years I’ve heard from many tenants across Scotland who have not had fixedterm leases renewed as landlords chose instead to sell to green investors or enter into large-scale commercial forestry.

Even tenants with secure leases are coming under pressure from landlords seeking to resume land to make way for “greenwashi­ng” purposes.

Not only are these obstacles a deterrent to an expanding tenanted sector, they also act against increasing diversity of land ownership – both Scottish Government priorities.

Green investors are drawn here by the opportunit­ies offered by our concentrat­ed land ownership, and the ability to buy large areas of land in a single transactio­n.

With an unregulate­d land market there is no barrier to further large land purchases for green purposes, which is itself a significan­t threat to fragile communitie­s as rural livelihood­s are displaced.

Fiscal leverage is a tool which could have a strong and immediate influence in addressing these land use issues.

With some of the main taxes being reserved to Westminste­r, the Scottish Government’s limited power to use tax to influence land policy may be a barrier to our “just transition” to a green economy.

However, there are stakeholde­rs south of the border seeking the same fiscal changes to help their tenanted sector and LBTT – currently a blunt tool but within Holyrood’s devolved powers – could be modified to better support Scotland’s land reform priorities.

 ?? ??
 ?? ?? CHALLENGE: Fiscal leverage can be influentia­l in deciding how land is used – for farming or for carbon trading.
CHALLENGE: Fiscal leverage can be influentia­l in deciding how land is used – for farming or for carbon trading.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom