The Courier & Advertiser (Fife Edition)

$10m Fifa payment didn’t show up in CFU accounts

Money intended for legacy programme spent in other ways

- MarTyn ziegler

The $10million sent from Fifa to Jack Warner never appeared in the annual accounts of the Caribbean-Football Union (CFU) and nor did Fifa track the money to ensure it had been invested correctly, it can be disclosed.

The money, which according to a US justice department indictment was a bribe for Warner and his deputy Chuck Blazer to vote for South Africa to host the 2010 World Cup, was sent in 2008 and officially destined for the CFU as a legacy programme to support football in the Caribbean.

Instead, the money was removed from the CFU bank account in New York and used by Warner in a number of ways including paying Blazer $750,000.

The bribery scandal has caused a crisis in the world governing body and last week Sepp Blatter announced he is to step down as Fifa president.

The CFU's financial statement for 2008 makes no mention of the $10m payment going through its bank account, stating that its only revenue was $1m from tournament sponsorshi­p and $15,000 in membership dues.

The CFU audit was carried out by Kenny Rampersad, who was also the personal accountant of Warner and Blazer.

The $10m did not show up in the 2008 financial statements of the CONCACAF federation either – Warner was president of both that organisati­on and the CFU.

Fifa insists that "member associatio­ns and confederat­ions have to provide Fifa with an audited financial statement every year"... to ensure that "all financial assistance payments are invested correctly".

The organisati­on said, however, it had not had the right to audit the CFU.

A Fifa spokesman said: "The Caribbean Football Union is not a member associatio­n of Fifa, so Fifa has no right to audit it and has not done so."

The $10m payment was paid by Fifa to Warner at the request of South Africa, but is not itemised in Fifa’s 2008 accounts.

Fifa’s auditors KPMG did not flag up the payment in its annual report and would not comment on the case, saying in a statement: "As Fifa’s statutory auditor, we are bound by profession­al confidenti­ality and have to refrain from any comment regarding our client."

Fifa has said it merely "facilitate­d the reallocati­on" of funds destined for the World Cup to Warner at the request of South Africa.

The South African government has insisted the money was not paid as a bribe.

Blazer has, however, pleaded guilty to taking the money as a bribe to vote for South Africa following a deal agreed in 2004 involving "high-ranking officials of Fifa, the South African government, and the South African bid committee", according to the US indictment.

Rampersad's involvemen­t as an auditor was criticised by a 2013 report by CONCACAF's integrity committee instigated following Warner's resignatio­n in 2011.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom