The Courier & Advertiser (Fife Edition)
Belief in independence ‘protected’ under laws
SNP councillor claims discrimination against MoD
An employment tribunal has ruled that a belief in Scottish independence is “protected” under equality laws in a discrimination case involving an SNP councillor.
Chris McEleny, SNP group leader on Inverclyde Council, is pursuing the Ministry of Defence (MoD), his former employer, claiming he was unfairly targeted over his support for the cause.
Following a preliminary hearing, Judge Frances Eccles was persuaded that Mr McEleny’s backing for independence “has a sufficiently similar cogency to a religious belief ... to qualify as a philosophical belief”.
It could therefore be relied upon as a “protected characteristic” for claiming discrimination under the Equality Act 2010.
The case will now go forward to a full hearing.
Mr McEleny’s case centres around his treatment by his former employer when he announced his candidacy for the SNP depute leadership role in 2016.
He was also working as an electrician at the MoD munitions site in Beith, North Ayrshire.
He says that around the time of the leadership hustings he was told that his security clearance had been revoked and he was suspended.
Mr McEleny says he was interviewed by national security officials on issues including his pro-independence views.
He quit claiming he was unfairly targeted for his stance on leaving the UK and his support for the “social democratic values” of the SNP.
Mr McEleny argued his views were “genuinely held”, and “serious, cohesive and important”.
However, a lawyer acting for the MoD said there was a significant difference in law between a political opinion or affiliation and philosophical belief.
However, Judge Eccles found that sovereignty and “self-determination” are “weighty and substantial aspects of human life”, and was persuaded that “how a country should be governed is sufficiently serious to amount to a philosophical belief”.
Lawyer Aamer Anwar, speaking on behalf of Mr McEleny, said: “This legal precedent now enables my client to pursue a claim for direct discrimination alleging that he was discriminated against because of this belief.”
An MoD spokesman said: “It would be inappropriate to comment on the details of an ongoing employment tribunal.”