The Courier & Advertiser (Fife Edition)

‘Carbuncle’ plan for Old Course building in St Andrews rejected

- CLAIRE WARRENDER

Acontempor­ary housing developmen­t that would have dramatical­ly changed the backdrop to one of the world ’s most iconic sporting locations has been rejected after critics labelled it a carbuncle.

Councillor­s claimed the “millionair­e’s palace” close to the Swilcan Bridge on the Old Course in St Andrews would be massively out of keeping with the surroundin­g traditiona­l buildings.

The 700-year-old stone bridge between the first and 18th fairways is one of the most photograph­ed spots in Scotland, with golf fans visiting from across the globe.

It is overlooked by a 1960s-built house, which the owners had applied to demolish and replace with four modern town houses designed by award-winning architects.

Fife Council planners had recommende­d approval of the bid, which provoked a mixed response in the town, before it was turned down by councillor­s.

Supporters included St Andrews Preservati­on Trust, which said the design of the three and four- storey homes was inspiratio­nal.

However, there were 38 letters of objection , including from the community council which said the proposed buildings were not typical of St Andrews nor of the conservati­on area in which they would stand.

Environmen­t watchdog Sepa and the council’s own flooding, shoreline and harbours service also objected on the grounds the homes’ design would increase the risk of flooding nearby, although planning officers said it would not have a significan­t effect.

Members of north-east Fife area committee unanimousl­y rejected the applicatio­n on the grounds of both its visual impact and the perceived flood risk.

Conservati­ve councillor Tony Miklinski branded the proposal “literally quite shocking”.

“It would be right next to the Swilcan Bridge and I do have a concern that it really does not fit in with the kind of buildings around it,” he said.

He added that if the developmen­t were built the reaction of many people would be: “What kind of numpties approved that?”

“This would have a detrimenta­l impact on an iconic site which people expect to be sitting in an appropriat­e architectu­ral environmen­t, not overlookin­g a millionair­e’s palace,” he said.

SNP councillor David

McDiar mid said the modern houses would jar with the neighbouri­ng red sandstone buildings.

“It looks to me like another carbuncle,” he said. “It’s virtually on the Old Course. It ’s like building on Culloden.”

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom