The Courier & Advertiser (Fife Edition)

Tee to Green: Masters TV figures show need for fans

- Steve Scott

Regular readers will know the existence of the Extreme Journalist Licence, my vehicle for changing my mind completely and attempting to get away with it while still retaining credibilit­y.

The basic rule is this: for every 10 years served at the coal face of free seats, free lunches and questionin­g of surly sports stars, you’re allowed one shameless about-face.

At 38 years and counting as of last month, I’m allowed three per year and am in plain sight of a fourth, although in the changing world of digital journalism (what the hell is SEO a ny w ay ? ) a 40 th anniversar­y is certainly not the sure thing it once was.

Anyway, you may have guessed that I’m invoking one of my EJLs this week, the first this year – I’ve got to No v e m b e r without retrac ing my steps b l a t a n t l y, which is a triumph of sorts. And it directly concerns you.

I may have given the impress ion tha t I cons idered peop le attending major sports events to be an outdated and indeed unnecessar­y addendum to the overall spectacle. It seemed to be a trend, accelerate­d by the Covid-19 crisis, that fans were a little too much bother.

Ma r t i n Gilbert, the retiring chief executive of Aberdeen Standard Investment­s, the long-time sponsor of the Scottish Open, planted this seed. Martin pointed out in several conversati­ons that at least in the events he was involved with, spectators didn’t have much affect at all; they contribute­d a tiny percentage of the profit margin, even those paying large sums for hospitalit­y.

TV was what mattered. It brought in the money via exclusive rights and advertisin­g, and it also ac ted as pr ice less promotion – in Martin’s case, in the USA and the Fa r East , where his company could grow.

Fo r ASI, and other sponsors on the European Tour and throughout golf, a live audience is not really high on their list of priorities. And when Covid19 meant no elite golf events had fans present – not just those staged in Saudi Arabia – it wouldn’t really matter.

Well, after eight months

of this pestilent pandemic, it clearly, blatantly does matter. Despite the dreams of the accountant­s who run European football (or aspire to), that sport has been incredibly diminished by the absence o f supporters, and every other mass-audience sport is the same.

At the Scotland-France game at Murrayfiel­d on Sunday, the y played a recording of a packed house singing “Flower of Scotland” at the anthems which only made you pine for the absence of real people even more.

But rather than just the

sheer emotion fans bring, this is clearly beginning to talk at a more telling level for those who run top-class spor t, and last week’s Masters brought it home even more.

CBS’ TV ratings for the first November Masters were down 51%. That’s a staggering figure given how much appeal we thought the event would have – autumnal colours at Augusta , the Bryson DeChambeau hype, Tiger’s defence, the sheer longing of the 19-month gap between tournament­s. There are some caveats the most notable being

that for the first (and surely last time) Augusta was up against the NFL, College Football and America’s other “Fall” staple sports. But it was the Masters, man, “a tradition like no other”!

And it followed a trend. The US Open and PGA TV ratings were well down. American TV audience figures for the NBA finals, baseball’s World Series, and ice hockey’s Stanley Cup all plummeted during the pandemic.

In the NFL, where ratings have long been thought to be indestruct­ible against all eventualit­ies, numbers have also slumped. Over here, Sky Sports’ coverage had a predictabl­e spike in viewers at the restart but h av e s e tt l e d down to “normal” figures, and they took a pounding during the lockdown as hundreds of viewers paused or dropped the ir subscr ipt ions altogether.

Figures for rugby ’s Autumn Nations Cup have yet to come in, but given the compe tition is on Amazon Prime for the first time there’s nothing to properly compare it to.

The premise quoted by Martin Gilbert is still the same – fans don’t make a huge difference to the bottom line with the cash they pay to get in – TV rights is still how sports make their money, and will be for the foreseeabl­e future.

However, and there’s an obvious irony in this, the presence of a live audience roaring their approval or howling in derision when fate goes against their team/hero is an absolutely essential element for the armchair viewer. Without it, a large number people are clearly not engaged and simply switch off or don’t tune in.

So yes, the organisers and the sponsors don’ t need the fans. But they do need the ir pr imary paymasters in golf and all other sports, the TV companies, who in turn desperatel­y need the fans as a living , breathing backdrop to the action.

You can play the big events like the majors in golf or the finals in football, or the Super Bowls and the Six Na t i o n s during a pandemic, sure.

But sport will simply not be the same until we have the essential element of mass public participat­ion restored.

 ??  ??
 ??  ?? RATINGS FLOP: Tommy Fleetwood is framed by the autumnal colours at Augusta – a first for the Masters.
RATINGS FLOP: Tommy Fleetwood is framed by the autumnal colours at Augusta – a first for the Masters.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom