The Courier & Advertiser (Fife Edition)

Strike threat over plan to axe civil service jobs

- ALAN JONES AND AMY GIBBONS

The government is on a collision course with unions and faces the threat of a national strike over controvers­ial plans to axe tens of thousands of jobs in the civil service.

The prime minister sparked outrage after it was revealed he has tasked his Cabinet with cutting about 90,000 jobs.

Boris Johnson is understood to have told ministers on Thursday that the service should be slashed by a fifth.

Unions reacted with fury, with one leader warning that national strike action was “very much on the table”.

The Public and Commercial Services union (PCS) is to hold an emergency meeting of its executive committee next week to discuss its response. General secretary

Mark Serwotka told the PA news wire that any job cuts would affect anyone relying on public services.

He said: “The government complains about longer delays for passports and driving licences at the same time as sacking the people who are working so hard to clear the backlog.

“This is not about efficiency. This is about the prime minister trying to create a smokescree­n to detract from his utter shambles of a government.

“He has chosen to cause our cost-of-living crisis and is desperate to point the blame somewhere, and he has chosen to point the finger at hardworkin­g PCS members who kept the country running throughout the pandemic.

“Our members will not be the scapegoats for a failing government. We have our conference in 10 days’ time. Taking national strike action is very much on the table.”

Dave Penman, general secretary of the FDA, which represents senior civil servants, told PA: “The reason for the civil service’s expansion since 2016 isn’t because the government loosened the purse strings.

“The government needed civil servants to deal with the consequenc­es of two unpreceden­ted events: Brexit and the Covid pandemic.

“To govern is to choose and ultimately this government can decide to cut the civil service back to 2016 levels, but it will also then have to choose what the reduced civil service will no longer have the capacity to do. Will they affect passports, borders or health?

“Without an accompanyi­ng strategy, these cuts appear more like a continuati­on of the government’s civil service culture wars, or even worse, ill-thought out, rushed job slashes that won’t lead to a more cost-effective government.”

Mike Clancy, general secretary of the Prospect union, said the proposal represente­d “an outrageous act of vandalism on our public services.”

“Through Brexit, and then the pandemic, we have never been more reliant in peace time on our civil service,” he said.

“Our members are highly skilled and there is a real risk to government delivery from losing their vital expertise.

“The big cuts to public services since 2010 have often proved an expensive error – these proposals risk doubling down on the mistake.”

TUC deputy general secretary Paul Nowak said: “The government is yet again treating the civil service with contempt.

“Civil servants are key workers who keep this country running. They deliver vital services, collect taxes, help people back into employment, regulate medicines, negotiate trade deals and thousands of other things that bind society together.

“It is shameful that the prime minister is throwing them under a bus to distract from the government’s failure to deal with the cost-of-living crisis.”

A government spokeswoma­n said “the public rightly expect their government to lead by example and run as efficientl­y as possible” as the nation faces rising costs.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom