The Courier & Advertiser (Perth and Perthshire Edition)

Reality bites for SNP’s case

- Alex Bell

That is still a very big hole in Scottish spending, well beyond what reasonable tax increases could raise.

Should a man be bitten by the Brazilian Wandering Spider, he will experience multiple erections over several days. After that, too much damage means the proud days are over. This seems a good metaphor for the independen­ce case – a period of extreme excitement, and perhaps the delusion that one had become god’s gift – followed by flaccid redundancy.

It also notes the peculiar maleness of the argument to date – a bullying and argumentat­ive tone, a fixation with competing “facts”, a tendency to overexagge­rate assets.

Three dates mark the moment when the high times turned down forever. Lets start with February 9.

On this day, at Holyrood’s finance committee, Scottish National Party members voted down the proposal for a Scottish Fiscal Commission.

This incredible decision – actively resisting discoverin­g more about Scotland – was barely noticed at the time, but is very important.

For 20 years the SNP included in its manifestoe­s the need for an independen­t economic unit.

When the chance to have one came, the party blocked it.

Outdated informatio­n

The reason is simply because such a unit would have produced economic data that contradict­ed the macho armoury of outdated informatio­n on which the movement’s bully boys still thrive.

Instead of nation-building, the independen­ce party was using its majority to keep Scots in the dark.

The next important date is February 25 when the “fiscal framework” was agreed.

The Scottish Government had cleverly run negotiatio­ns for this into the period when the UK Government was more concerned about the EU referendum. Downing Street did a quick settlement massively in Scotland’s favour to clear the desks for its European battle.

In effect, the UK Treasury is underwriti­ng Scotland’s foray into tax collecting. If Holyrood gets it wrong, then London will cover the losses.

It’s very good for Scots – not only responsibi­lity, but an insurance policy in the back pocket if it all goes belly up.

Yet the SNP seem unable to celebrate this coup, perhaps wary they might alert the indie faithful that the bigger game is up.

The last date is March 9, when the government announced their annual balance sheet – what is earned within Scotland’s borders and what is spent on services. There is a £15 billion gap into the red. Were Scotland about to become independen­t, Edinburgh would have to find a way of filling that gap, plus the costs of the independen­ce process.

If Scotland were in a currency union with either Sterling or the Euro, there would be borrowing limits which would prevent the newly independen­t state simply borrowing £15bn.

For sake of argument let’s say borrowing (which will bring its own costs) cuts the deficit in half to £7.5bn.

That is still a very big hole in Scottish spending, well beyond what reasonable tax increases could raise.

Combine these three dates and you have the period when the SNP’s economic case for independen­ce collapsed.

The blood ran from the posturing and boasting.

The SNP’s mistake was not to advocate independen­ce – that is still possible, if you want to accept some hard times as the price to pay for sovereignt­y.

The mistake was they had promised wealth too.

The independen­ce part remains, but the wealth has shrunk.

Unfortunat­ely the macho wing can’t let go of the imaginary money – swathes of the membership were seduced into arguing an economic case which never stood up to scrutiny.

A mindset prevails that anything but independen­ce is failure, and that sovereignt­y will come with cash to spare.

Arguably Scotland’s greatest problem is that the SNP leadership don’t know how, or don’t have the courage to correct this view.

Undone

The members, as if infected by a spider bite, have been rampant for some time. This male parade has not been to the party’s good.

It has undone 20 years of modernisin­g efforts, which went to great lengths to eliminate the aggressive overtones of nationalis­m and position the party in the social democratic camp.

All the work on policy and economics has been reduced to tribal war cries, the bully boys deaf to criticism and blind to self-image.

Remember these dates – they mark the moment when reality triumphed over fiction.

Scotland has got a fantastic deal for its future, against a background of very negative data and a culture which no longer even wants to hear the truth.

Here is Nicola’s greatest opportunit­y. Having won a great prize now is the moment for courage.

She should take this set of circumstan­ces and make it a platform for the future.

Her party should be told they have already won. That Scotland has powers and potential it didn’t dream of 20 years ago.

Not only that, the UK will help us along if things turn bad. This is a victory.

On this we can build a better future, by removing the element of uncertaint­y and slowly going about the business of good government.

We need humility to see what we have won and to make the most of it.

As for the bully boys, well when the spider’s venom wears off, everything goes soft forever.

 ?? Picture: Andrew Cowan. ?? John Swinney during the negotiatio­ns on the “fiscal framework”.
Picture: Andrew Cowan. John Swinney during the negotiatio­ns on the “fiscal framework”.
 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom