The Courier & Advertiser (Perth and Perthshire Edition)

Workers rights failing to keep up with times

Review of legislatio­n under way in the UK

- STephanie Gallacher, soliciTor, ThornTons

While the gig economy continues to gain traction across various industries, the hospitalit­y sector is no stranger to working with short-term casual or agency staff.

Recruitmen­t in the hospitalit­y sector needs to take account of the seasonalit­y and unpredicta­bility of the industry, and it is common practice to use temporary workers to provide cover at busy times.

Short term staff are often hired on an event-by-event basis, with roles often fulfilled by agency workers, or engaged on a casual or zero hours basis.

While these arrangemen­ts are generally used where the employer wants to engage a worker on a flexible basis (while incurring as few legal obligation­s as possible), workers will usually be entitled to some basic employment rights such as the national minimum wage, the right to paid annual leave, and others under Working Time Regulation­s 1998.

Agency workers are also covered by the Agency Workers Regulation­s 2010, which provides some additional protection­s.

However, the growth in popularity of mobile platforms which enable workers to pick up “gigs” or shifts on demand, has led to an increase in individual­s undertakin­g short-term or freelance work, usually on a self-employed basis.

Individual­s who are self-employed have very few employment rights or protection­s, and while the concept of on-demand recruitmen­t undoubtedl­y lends itself well to the low-skilled, casual roles required within the hospitalit­y sector, it is difficult to ignore concerns being raised in this area.

Parties in favour of the gig economy model cite the mutual benefits of noobligati­on flexibilit­y for both parties, while cynics voice concerns about the erosion of employment rights stemming from misclassif­ication of workers as self-employed, and the potential for exploitati­on of low skilled workers.

The legal disputes in this area are well documented. Last year, an employment tribunal held that Uber drivers are workers, rather than self-employed contractor­s, and therefore entitled to the associated statutory rights.

While this decision is subject to appeal, cycle worker Margaret Dewhurst was also found by tribunal to be a worker of logistics firm CitySprint.

At the same time, the controvers­y surroundin­g zero hours contracts has been widely reported, and concerns have been raised in respect of the use of agency staff at fashion retailer Asos.

Amid the growing debate surroundin­g the gig economy, and other forms of flexible working such as zero hours contracts, it is fair to say UK employment law is not equipped to cater for atypical working arrangemen­ts which have evolved in line with new technology and changing cultural priorities in terms of instant delivery.

To address this, the government is undertakin­g a review of how employment practices need to change to keep up with modernised business models.

In the meantime, as the legal disputes rumble on, we might see more gig workers bringing claims against employers to secure more favourable rights.

As an industry which reaps the benefits of the flexibilit­y offered by the gig economy, the hospitalit­y sector is bound to be carefully watching these developmen­ts.

 ??  ?? Casual work is common in the hospitalit­y sector.
Casual work is common in the hospitalit­y sector.
 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom