The Courier & Advertiser (Perth and Perthshire Edition)

Best value might not be cheapest

- Graham Huband Courier business editor twitter: @C–ghuband

Somewhat absentmind­edly I shared a version of the above graphic on social media last week.

It will never win an award for eye-catching graphic design, but boy did it make an impact.

Without supporting background context, on LinkedIn alone it has been viewed more than 4,500 times in six days and fired a debate about procuremen­t practices in local councils.

The graphic was produced by the Federation of Small Businesses Scotland as they launched their wider manifesto for small businesses ahead of next month’s local council elections.

And, while they have an agenda to push, it is plain to see there is a gulf between local authoritie­s and their community businesses. Across the country, the FSB estimate that councils spend less than a fifth of their procuremen­t budgets with local SMEs.

Total procuremen­t spend across all 32 Scottish local authoritie­s was £6.1 billion in 2015/16. About £1.2bn was spent by councils in their local SME supply chain – a ratio of 19.7%.

Angus and Perth and Kinross were marginally above average in their spend, while Fife came in slightly below at 19.3%.

Locally, Dundee was the worst performer, with the council spending 17% of their procuremen­t budget with local firms, or around one-in-six pounds.

The best performers by far were the Shetland and Orkney Islands and Eilean Siar, the authority representi­ng the Outer Hebrides, at more than double the national average.

In their manifesto paper, the FSB calls for a 2% uplift nationally in local procuremen­t spending – a move it says would channel a further £600 million into smaller concerns in communitie­s across Scotland.

Procuremen­t is hugely complex and many reasons – not least the drive for best value – make buying from big operators the easier and more attractive option for councils. But that is a double-edged sword. Buy nationally and the likelihood is the cash that has been spent will be lost to that local economy for good. It is a net loss rather than a saving.

Buy locally and there is a much greater chance of the cash being recycled in shops, pubs, hotels and in procuring secondary services in the regional economy. That is a net gain.

The logic may be with local procuremen­t but, ironically, the will to spend more from hard-pressed council budgets has to come from the centre.

Without a clear mandate from Holyrood to improve local spending rates, nothing will change.

On social media, one commentor said a holistic view rather than a transactio­nal approach was needed for the best possible outcome from the procuremen­t process.

I agree.

Buy nationally and the likelihood is the cash that has been spent will be lost to that local economy for good

 ??  ?? An FSB table shows percentage of council procuremen­t budgets spent with local SMEs in 2015/16.
An FSB table shows percentage of council procuremen­t budgets spent with local SMEs in 2015/16.
 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom