The Courier & Advertiser (Perth and Perthshire Edition)

Battle over road to history

Could the dualling of the A9 put the Killiecran­kie battlefiel­d at risk?

- Michael Alexander reports malexander@thecourier.co.uk

Soldiers of Killiecran­kie including James Rattray are flying the flag for the Perthshire battlefiel­d site which they fear will be destroyed by plans to dual the A9. Picture: Angus Findlay.

It was the bloodiest battle in the Jacobite uprisings which resulted in the deaths of an estimated 600 Jacobite and 1,500 Scottish government soldiers.

But could the site of the Killiecran­kie battlefiel­d in Perthshire be irretrieva­bly destroyed by plans to dual the A9?

That’s the fear of local history and events group Soldiers of Killiecran­kie, which has formally commented on the proposals through a Transport Scotland public consultati­on that closes today.

Campaigner­s – including descendant­s of some of those who fought in the battle – told The Courier they do not believe the transport authority has “properly thought through how best to route the new carriagewa­y through the battlefiel­d”.

However, Transport Scotland says it has “carefully developed” its plans to dual the route from Killiecran­kie to Glen Garry, taking into account available research and specialist advice.

The Battle of Killiecran­kie – which took place on July 27 1689 – was fought between a combined Scottish and Irish Jacobite force loyal to King James VII and II and Government troops supporting the Protestant King William.

The Jacobites, led by Bonnie Dundee, were mainly Highland Scots, gathered by the clan chief Cameron of Lochiel, while the Government troops under the command of the Highlander General Hugh Mackay of Scourie, were mostly Lowland Scots.

The Jacobites achieved a stunning victory but suffered heavy casualties, including their leader.

The battlefiel­d has been included in the Inventory of Historic Battlefiel­ds in Scotland and protected by Historic Scotland under the Scottish Historical Environmen­t Policy of 2009. But according to Killiecran­kie man James Rattray and his brother Rulzion – whose six-times great-grandfathe­r James Rattray fought at Killiecran­kie and whose four-times great-grandfathe­r, also called James Rattray, fought at Culloden in 1746 – that heritage is now under threat.

Mr Rattray and his brother, whose ancestors moved to India after the Jacobites’ defeat at Culloden, have been mapping out the Killiecran­kie battlefiel­d with flags around Urrard House, south of the A9. Most of the killing took place on the government line here. But very little archaeolog­ical excavation has taken place and they fear the site will be lost.

“Despite the A9 passing through the battlefiel­d in the late 1970s, Killiecran­kie battlefiel­d remains one of the best-preserved Scottish battlefiel­ds and still contains a lot of informatio­n yet to be discovered,” said James, 66, a visitor guide publisher who lives on the battlefiel­d.

“I’m not against the A9 – the dualling has got to happen – but the concerns I have now are that I don’t think the route has been properly thought through. Why not widen the road into the field on the north side that was already disturbed in the 1970s?

“Killiecran­kie has the potential to become like another Culloden site, with a proper visitor centre. But once the site has gone there is no bringing back the (site as it was before the) destructio­n.”

A Transport Scotland spokespers­on said: “As the existing A9 already runs through the site of the battlefiel­d, any of the dual carriagewa­y widening options – for example, widening the existing road on its northbound side or widening the existing road on its southbound side – will have some impact on the battlefiel­d. We have therefore carefully developed our plans to dual the route between Killiecran­kie to Glen Garry taking into account available research and specialist advice, including consultati­on with Historic Environmen­t Scotland.

“This has also included consultati­on with locals (stretching) back to 2012. As part of the design work, we conducted a metal detecting survey of the battlefiel­d in 2015 to support the specialist advice we had received and help inform the design and manage the impacts.

“As part of our A9 dualling programme we identified the preferred route for this section in March 2016 and are now taking forward the next stage of design with the draft road orders published for formal comment in November 2017 and public exhibition­s held for locals and road users on December 13 and 14 2017.

“Anyone can comment and the deadline is January 23. We will then consider all comments received as we further develop our plans. The route through the battlefiel­d has been developed using the available interpreta­tion of the battle. We would be happy to discuss any additional informatio­n or advice the group have received to support their concerns.”

A spokesman for the National Trust for Scotland, which runs the nearby Killiecran­kie Visitor Centre, said: “We have been in discussion­s with Transport Scotland and have raised our concerns and opinions and are confident, given the constructi­ve stance they have adopted so far, that they will take these on board.

“It is our view that further quality archaeolog­ical work be undertaken, allowing for further evaluation and mitigation.”

 ??  ??
 ?? Picture: Angus Findlay. ?? James Rattray beside the Killiecran­kie memorial cairn.
Picture: Angus Findlay. James Rattray beside the Killiecran­kie memorial cairn.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom