The Courier & Advertiser (Perth and Perthshire Edition)
Supermarket giants in call for more time over merger probe
GROCERS: Asda and Sainsbury’s court challenge to timetable set down by UK’s competition watchdog
Sainsbury’s and Asda are challenging the competition watchdog in court for more time to be given to the probe into their £12 billion mega-merger on the grounds of its “unprecedented scale and complexity”.
The two supermarkets are to apply for a judicial review of the Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) investigation into their proposed tie-up.
But the watchdog has said it will defend its position in court, and is “not willing to compromise on the thoroughness or objectivity” of its investigation.
The application, lodged on Wednesday with the Competition Appeal Tribunal, will request a review of the CMA’s timetable and process.
Sainsbury’s and Asda said they have asked the CMA for an additional 11 working days over the Christmas period to respond to a large amount of material recently provided to them.
Both retailers argue the current timetable does not give them or the CMA “sufficient time to provide and consider all the evidence, given the unprecedented scale and complexity of the case”.
In a joint statement, Sainsbury’s and Asda said: “This is a case of unprecedented size and complexity and we have a responsibility to our customers and colleagues to ensure that we and the CMA have enough time to make and consider all the facts and evidence.
“This is not a decision we have taken lightly. It is about ensuring a thorough process and reasonable timetable. We remain confident in the case for merging the businesses and the significant customer benefits.”
However the CMA said the timeline is typical for an investigation.
“If we gave the companies the extra time they are now asking for, it would put our ability to complete the investigation by the required deadline at very serious risk.
“We are not willing to compromise on the thoroughness or objectivity of our investigation and will robustly defend this case in court.”