The Courier & Advertiser (Perth and Perthshire Edition)

Lynx plan makes me wish our toothless wildlife agencies could be made extinct

- Jim Crumley

Have you ever seen a lynx? I have – once, there were two of them, apparently asleep at the foot of a tree in a wildlife park on the edge of Cumbernaul­d. No, it’s not the first line of a joke, it actually happened.

I was making a radio programme, about 25 years ago, on the subject of Scotland’s lost mammals and how we might reintroduc­e them (I’ve been singing this song for a long, long time…) and the moment came back into my mind because I have just had the misfortune to read a press release about a new lynx reintroduc­tion study by the Lynx to Scotland project.

The Cumbernaul­d park had a pair of lynxes and I went to see them and talk to their keeper. He explained that they didn’t do much at this time of the day. It was late morning, they are hunters of dusks and darkness and dawns. And true to form, there they were, asleep. Apparently.

A magpie landed in the top of the tree and began to descend, noisily, objecting to the presence of the lynxes. They ignored it, still sleeping. Apparently.

When the magpie was still about 10 feet up the tree, one of the lynxes, without taking the trouble to stand or stretch or otherwise indicate any awareness of the bird’s presence, sprang vertically upwards from a lying start, extended a foreleg and swung a claw at the bird, missing it by about two inches.

The lynx touched down again with featherwei­ght grace, looked round, lay down, curled up, and went back to sleep. Apparently.

I don’t like zoos of any kind anywhere, any form of wildlife incarcerat­ion. A wild lynx travels alone, its territory can cover several hundred square miles. These had a handful of acres. But I acknowledg­e a moment of insight that day in Cumbernaul­d, a sliver of awareness of what lurks within.

Which brings me back to the press release about the new study. Everything that is wrong with Scotland’s profession­al wildlife conservati­on was on display in the press release. I quote a few snippets:

“There is sufficient appetite from a diverse cross-sector of rural stakeholde­rs to examine whether potential barriers to a trial reintroduc­tion of Eurasian lynx to Scotland can be overcome, says the first detailed study into the social feasibilit­y of the species’ return…” Cross-sector?

“The Lynx to Scotland project spent a year consulting a wide range of national stakeholde­rs and local communitie­s in the Cairngorms National Park and Argyll… Among the wide-ranging views there was consensus for a participat­ory crossstake­holder approach to further explore the benefits and barriers to lynx reintroduc­tion…”

Over the coming years, expect more stakeholde­r consultati­on and more consensus for participat­ory approaches to further split infinitive­s and mangle the English language.

Compare and contrast. Spain had a problem with their native Iberian lynx. It was down to a hundred or so animals in scattered pockets. Extinction beckoned. Spain’s national wildlife agency bought a serious piece of wild country, declared it a dedicated national park, rounded up all the lynxes and released them there, created a stronghold , watched the lynx population reach a thousand over 10 years and then start to disperse, naturally.

Likewise, they are now strengthen­ing the wolf population in the north west of the country, safeguardi­ng it and watching it prosper.

Lynx to Scotland is a partnershi­p of three wildlife charities. None of them has statutory powers. Conservati­on in Scotland needs a dedicated wildlife agency that is properly funded and resourced, has the power to buy land to be owned by the nation and establish nature conservati­on as the top priority there, and ban the word “stakeholde­r” from the lips of every one of its employees. England and Wales also need such agencies for nature is indifferen­t to national borders.

Meanwhile, nature in Scotland gets dragged down and shackled by the same old rituals of Victorian land use, of gamekeeper­s and farmers who assume a moral authority over every species that gets in their way, and what passes for nature conservati­on wastes time and money and scunners their subscripti­onpaying members on meaningles­s consultati­on studies couched in even more meaningles­s language.

Lynx reintroduc­tion in the Highlands is a questionab­le exercise at best. Lynx to Scotland thinks there is enough habitat and prey in the Highlands for 400 lynxes. Good, because that will be more than enough to wipe out the tiny Scottish wildcat population once and for all. And many conservati­onists think the lynx is a good idea because it’s a significan­t predator and it’s not a wolf. And even though they know that wolf reintroduc­tion is the only one that makes sense and should be the overwhelmi­ng priority of every conservati­onist in the land, they don’t entertain the idea because it’s too difficult.

Naturescot is their stakeholde­r-obsessed role model. It also constitute­s one extinction that nature is desperate for, to be replaced by a pro-wildlife-at-all-costs agency, one that comes equipped not with an obsession for consultati­on exercises but with what you might call teeth and claws.

The lynx touched down again with featherwei­ght grace

 ?? ??
 ?? ?? PAWS FOR THOUGHT: The lynx reintroduc­tion project needs more considerat­ion and a dedicated wildlife agency to run it.
PAWS FOR THOUGHT: The lynx reintroduc­tion project needs more considerat­ion and a dedicated wildlife agency to run it.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom