The Courier & Advertiser (Perth and Perthshire Edition)

Why it was the end for Hughes at Pars

- ALAN TEMPLE

For the third time in the space of 12 months, Dunfermlin­e are looking for a new manager. Stevie Crawford; Peter Grant; John Hughes – all have exited during a miserable period at East End Park.

Hughes’ resignatio­n was confirmed on Thursday evening following lengthy discussion­s with the Pars hierarchy.

The news came 12 days after the Pars crashed down to League One following a play-off defeat against Queen’s Park.

While his departure was anything but a formality following the drop, Courier Sport analyses why – considerin­g the bigger picture – Dunfermlin­e and Hughes had to go their separate ways.

The former Falkirk and Hibs boss was brought in to salvage Dunfermlin­e’s Championsh­ip status. He failed in that brief. Hughes’ league record was an improvemen­t on his predecesso­r Grant. A point worth noting, given he had to effectivel­y build a new squad in the space of six weeks.

From the date of Hughes’ appointmen­t, Dunfermlin­e (28) picked up more points than Raith Rovers (27), Ayr United (27) and Queen of the South (22) in the

Championsh­ip. Not stellar but certainly not a capitulati­on.

That does not lessen the ignominy of the Pars’ 1-0 play-off defeat against Queen’s Park – a simply unacceptab­le result over two legs.

Yet, it is not inconceiva­ble that, in slightly different circumstan­ces, Hughes could have been kept on.

Courier Sport understand­s that, during a recent board meeting, the point was made that the club cannot simply keep changing bosses. The next manager will be its fourth in the space of one year.

However, there was ultimately a majority consensus that Hughes’ resignatio­n would be an acceptable outcome for all parties.

A changing of the guard was going to occur regardless of Dunfermlin­e’s league status.

It was hoped that a stable, fruitful transition from outgoing chairman Ross McArthur to new chief executive David Cook could occur with the club still in the Championsh­ip.

A more fraught summer now lies ahead.

Neverthele­ss, the opportunit­y to cultivate a sense of excitement – of a much-needed fresh start – still remains.

And it would have been

impossible to create the required separation from the disappoint­ments of last season with the same man occupying the dugout.

Under Cook – and with the financial backing of German investors DAFC Fussball GmbH – Dunfermlin­e can seek to enthuse a disillusio­ned fan base with a positive appointmen­t and craft a winning side in a lower league.

All of which is no given, it should be said.

With Falkirk, Queen of the South, Airdrie and Kelty Hearts in the division, League One is a shark tank next season.

Neverthele­ss, the top gig on the Halbeath Road remains an inviting one for an ambitious coach.

Perhaps the most alarming aspect of Dunfermlin­e’s relegation was the apathy with which it was greeted.

Sure, there were a few choruses urging John Hughes to walk away in blunt terms. There was another ditty referencin­g his previous time at Falkirk in unflatteri­ng terms.

But the vitriol that characteri­sed the latter days of the Grant reign was absent.

For the most part, it was thundering indifferen­ce; a fan base completely beaten into submission by the events of the 2021-22 campaign.

Just 3,179 supporters attended their play-off defeat against Queen’s Park at East End Park – more than 2,000 down on their Championsh­ip finale against Queen of the South.

The blunt fact is: if Hughes had remained in post, many fans would not have been back.

Their minds were made up. He was tainted by the drop.

The financial impact of that – let alone the miserable optics – would have been unacceptab­le to Cook, a man with a background in marketing with Celtic, Everton and Nottingham Forest.

Back in the third tier of the Scottish game, the Pars need the backing of their fans more than ever.

Which is all well and good… providing the Pars get it right this time.

Allan Johnston was far from universall­y popular but guided Dunfermlin­e to the promotion play-offs.

Stevie Crawford had plenty of naysayers but – if nothing else – would have been unlikely to have sent Dunfermlin­e careering towards relegation in the space of three months.

Peter Grant was a disaster. Hughes’ salvage job was unsatisfac­tory.

That is not an impressive run of appointmen­ts from the decision-makers at East End Park.

With McArthur now enjoying a richly merited retirement from football (the last year does not wipe out almost a decade of work), it is beholden upon Cook and sporting director Thomas Meggle to pull a rabbit out of the hat.

 ?? ??
 ?? ?? RELEGATION: John Hughes was brought in with the objective of keeping Dunfermlin­e in the Championsh­ip – but they have slumped to League One.
RELEGATION: John Hughes was brought in with the objective of keeping Dunfermlin­e in the Championsh­ip – but they have slumped to League One.
 ?? ?? Peter Grant, top, and Stevie Crawford.
Peter Grant, top, and Stevie Crawford.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom