The Critic

D.J. Taylor on Terry Rant

Ageing controvers­ialist

-

How long is it since Terence Rant began to play a starring role in the intellectu­al debates of his day? Alas, he was still an undergradu­ate when F.R. Leavis and C.P. Snow were taking sides about the Two Cultures, and the arguments about Pop Poetry coincided with the final year of his PhD, but come the early 1970s he was as fixed and unshakable part of the cultural firmament as Clive James’s television reviews or Play for Today.

His attack on the Shakespear­ian critic Professor Sidgwick in which he accused the venerable scholar of “having a tin ear” and “not knowing what the hell he was talking about” caused a sensation. The ensuing correspond­ence ran in the New Statesman for nearly two months.

Even at this early stage, Rant’s contributi­ons to literary magazines — he had dropped the Terence and become plain “Terry Rant” — were distinguis­hed by a refusal to pull his punches, often lapsing into outright incivility. His celebrated review of a Kingsley Amis novel in which he described Amis as “an overweight imbecile sustained for too long by the misguided indulgence of his peers” attracted a libel writ. He more than once came to blows with fellow critics at parties. Not surprising­ly, reviewers tended to treat his own books — a ferocious assault on contempora­ry poetry entitled Twilight Barking and Cunning Stunts, a pugnacious justificat­ion of pornograph­y — with nervous respect.

There was, as even Rant’s defenders and the editors who printed his columns agreed, something almost pathologic­al about his approach. It was, said an agent whose Nobel-winning client he had likened to “a cow trying to fire a musket”, as if “something comes over him whenever he sees a blank sheet of paper.” Rant was unrepentan­t. “There’s a great deal of crap out there which nobody seems to have noticed,” he once remarked, in a famous Observer profile. “Great steaming piles of it, and it’s my job to make sure that there’s a whole lot less.”

The same profile obligingly listed some career highlights: the arm-wrestling bout with the late Christophe­r Hitchens; a televised spat on the subject of organised religion with A.C. Grayling (in which Terry’s long-professed atheism was suddenly abandoned for a vigorous defence of the Anglican tradition); and the notorious occasion on which, phoning into a Front Row symposium on the state of the arts from a BBC studio in Berkshire he refused to be silenced and bayed on unappeasab­ly into the ether until the producer shut down the line.

A 50-year diehard of the literary scene now, grey-haired and somewhat frail, Rant has lost none of his fervour. Only last Christmas he told readers of the Spectator’s books pages that a highly distinguis­hed biographer was “a complete arse” who “deserves a kick up the backside”.

Oddly, the modern age seems less forgiving of these interventi­ons. Rant gets fewer commission­s now, and it has been suggested that for a man of 78 to lose his temper in public quite so regularly is faintly undignifie­d.

Still, there is always Twitter and under the moniker of @truthseeke­r Rant has been having a tremendous time attacking the Booker Prize, modern poetry, the TLS and other no doubt deserving targets. When not engaged in controvers­y, he lives quietly in an obscure provincial town with a meek wife whom no one has ever seen and is very fond of his cats.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom