The Daily Telegraph - Saturday - Review

‘I felt guilty and powerful’

The painter Celia Paul had a 10-year liaison with Lucian Freud. Now she reclaims her story, finds Lucy Scholes

-

WSELF-PORTRAIT by Celia Paul 216pp, Jonathan Cape, £20, ebook £9.99

hen Celia Paul, then 16, arrived at the Slade in 1976, she was bemused by the prospect of life drawing classes. “It seemed so artificial to me to draw a person one didn’t know or have any involvemen­t with,” she writes in Self-Portrait. “Surely art was about recording a personal vision?”

This relationsh­ip, between artist and model, lies at the heart of Paul’s memoir. Unsurprisi­ng, perhaps, for a woman who’s famous as both painter and sitter. Paul, who is about to turn 60, has spent her life painting the people closest to her. It was her portraits of her mother – Paul’s principal sitter for years, until she became too frail to climb the stairs to her daughter’s Bloomsbury studio – that first attracted the attention of Lucian Freud, then a visiting tutor at the Slade.

He and Paul had a decade-long relationsh­ip, begun when she was 18 and he was 55 (she gave birth to their son, Frank, in 1984), and during that time, Freud painted her often. Self-Portrait, though, is an unashamed bid to reclaim “her own story”, to become master of her own life and art, rather than being reduced to an object in Freud’s.

It opens with an intriguing disclaimer. “I am not a portrait painter,” Paul writes. “If I am anything, I have always been an autobiogra­pher and a chronicler of my life and family.” This book, which coincides with an exhibition at the Victoria Miro Gallery, and the release of a documentar­y about Paul by Jake Auerbach, feels like an extension of the same project. Just as Paul regards her paintings of those closest to her as a record of her own existence, so too SelfPortra­it is constitute­d by a series of portraits-in-writing. “Linda”, for example – the name of a teenage friend-turned-rival, a classmate of Paul’s who also demonstrat­ed notable early artistic talent – is the title of the chapter that deals with Paul’s time at boarding school.

Similarly, the texture of what she creates on the page is analogous to that of her paintings: her prose stripped back and minimalist, as devoid of excess adornment as her sombre, melancholy but emotionall­y charged canvases. Even at her most incendiary – when she tackles head-on, for example, what it’s like to be a woman artist both eclipsed by, and seen through the eyes of, her more famous male partner – Paul’s writing never loses this essence of calm solemnity.

Paul writes uncompromi­singly about her ambition, from the “sickening” surges of jealousy that coursed through her when Linda’s work was good, to her inability to put down her brush and abandon herself fully to being Freud’s muse (he spoke to her admiringly of Gwen John, who had stopped painting while she was passionate­ly involved with Rodin). The selfishnes­s that’s necessary for the making of great art is a familiar narrative when it comes to male genius, but there’s still something electrifyi­ng in encounteri­ng a woman who allows her artistic “instinct” to trump her maternal desires. (Paul handed her son’s care over to her mother, “so that I could continue to paint.”) She also refuses to cohabit with her husband, preferring the peace and freedom of her own flat and studio.

For all this candour, Paul’s revelation­s retain an air of abstrusene­ss. Not that they in any way ring false, but she gives no indication of feeling excoriated by the process of such candid self-exposure. Somehow, she remains detached. Perhaps it’s the whiff of “Never apologise, never explain” that permeates the text. She shows little interest in analysing the whys and wherefores, either of her behaviour or of those around her.

“I was disturbed by the experience,” she admits of Freud first taking her to bed, but this has less to do with his power as an older, already establishe­d artist,

Even at her most incendiary, Paul’s writing never loses its calm solemnity

and more her own innocence:

“I felt that I had sinned and that something had been irreparabl­y lost. I felt guilty and powerful. I felt that I’d stepped into a limitless and dangerous world.”

She’d only ever known life at her single-sex boarding school, and before that a childhood in India, at the theologica­l seminary run by her Christian missionary father, who later became the Bishop of Bradford. A different writer would have lingered on the dislocatio­n that the shift between such particular formative experience­s must have triggered – geographic­ally, culturally and spirituall­y – but there’s little in the way of such introspect­ion here.

Self-Portrait made me think of two recent, elliptical autobiogra­phical projects that refuse to conform to traditiona­l notions of intimate disclosure:

‘Something had been irreparabl­y lost. I’d stepped into a dangerous world’

Rachel Cusk’s autofictio­n trilogy, Outline, Transit and Kudos, about a divorced writer and mother who remarries (details lifted directly from Cusk’s own life); and Joanna Hogg’s film The Souvenir, which tells the story of the director’s time at film school, and her relationsh­ip with an older man, a highfuncti­oning heroin addict.

Cusk’s fictional alter-ego relates the stories of others while saying barely anything about herself; her identity is shaped by the absences left in the text. Hogg, meanwhile, shuts the audience out from the interior thoughts of her younger self (played by Honor Swinton Byrne), despite the fact that she is always on the screen. Like Cusk and Hogg, Paul plays with the balance between confession and dispassion. In their different ways, all three are challengin­g our ideas about how autobiogra­phy works.

There’s something tremendous­ly refreshing about Paul’s lack of sensationa­lism, which encourages a similar detachment in the reader. I found myself less interested in her (admittedly rather tame) depiction of the notorious Freud, and decidedly more absorbed in the astonishin­g relationsh­ip between Paul and her mother, particular­ly the way in which the interactio­n between them as painter and sitter turns, over the years, into a mutual act of deep generosity and love. Self-Portrait is both the obvious extension of Paul’s oeuvre, and a powerful, urgent and essential depiction of what it is to be a woman artist.

Call 0844 871 1514 to order for £16.99. Celia Paul is at Victoria Miro Gallery II, London N1, until Dec 20 (victoria-miro.com)

 ??  ??
 ??  ?? FAMILY IN FRAME
Paul’s My Mother and Frank, 1990
FAMILY IN FRAME Paul’s My Mother and Frank, 1990
 ??  ?? CANDID CAMERA Paul and her mother
CANDID CAMERA Paul and her mother
 ??  ??
 ??  ?? ‘I FELT THAT I HAD SINNED’
Paul in Painter and Model by Lucian Freud, 1986-87
‘I FELT THAT I HAD SINNED’ Paul in Painter and Model by Lucian Freud, 1986-87

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom