The Daily Telegraph - Saturday - Review

‘I just felt like being Marilyn for a minute’

Sixty years after her death, we still can’t let go of the blonde bombshell. But did she ever really exist, asks novelist Joyce Carol Oates

- By Iona McLAREN

‘All my life I’ve played Marilyn Monroe, Marilyn Monroe, Marilyn Monroe,” wept the actress in 1960. “I’ve tried to do a little better – and find myself doing an imitation of myself. I so want to do something different.”

Unfortunat­ely, movie audiences wanted the exact opposite: more Monroe, maximum Monroe. In her lifetime, their appetite was rampant enough to sustain the careers of shameless imitators, such as Jayne Mansfield (“the poor man’s Monroe”) and Diana Dors (“Swindon’s answer to Marilyn Monroe”), and make 20th Century Fox millions – of which Monroe herself saw so little that on her death, in 1962, she didn’t leave enough money to pay for a funeral. Joe DiMaggio, the second of her three ex-husbands, forked out for the private ceremony she had wanted, only to find fans tearing apart the floral tributes for souvenirs, like maenads.

Today, anything Monroe touched is coveted with a religiosit­y comparable to the medieval mania for the relics of saints. Collectors fight for pots of make-up in which you can still see her trailing finger marks. The tag and licence for her pet poodle (Maf, short for Mafia, a present from Frank Sinatra) sold in 1999 for $63,000. In 2016, the dress she wore to sing “Happy Birthday, Mr President” to JFK in 1962 was bought by Ripley’s Believe It or Not Museums for $5million. “We believe this is the most iconic piece of pop culture there is,” said Ripley’s vice-president. “I cannot think of one single item that tells the story of the 1960s as well as this dress.” Next month, Andy Warhol’s 1964 portrait, Shot Sage Blue Marilyn, is expected to set a new record for a 20th-century artwork when it goes on sale in New York, estimated at around $200 million.

What is it that makes people want to get their fingers on a part – any part – of Marilyn Monroe so badly? It’s a question that Joyce Carol Oates, author of Blonde, a 2000 Pulitzer Prize-winning novel about Monroe’s life, plays with in a new short story, “Miss Golden Dreams 1949”, out this month in a collection called Night, Neon. In it, a sex doll made from Monroe’s actual DNA whispers to bidders at Sotheby’s, goading them to outbid each other to take her home. “It’s a surreal story, even a sort of horror story,” Oates tells me, from her home in Princeton. “But it’s metaphoric­al. So many people tried to possess Marilyn while she was still alive.”

Blonde – a 740-page epic about the American dream and the female body which plays with tricks of voice, and mixes invention with fact, horror with fairy tale – has now been made into a film by Andrew Dominik, with Monroe played by the Cuban actress Ana de Armas (of Knives Out and No Time to Die). Long in developmen­t and shrouded in secrecy, it is expected to premiere at the Venice Film Festival this autumn – and Oates is one of the few people to have seen it (in a near-final cut) already. “I thought it was extremely intense,” she tells me. “Very stylised and beautiful.”

And what about the gore? Her novel is relentless­ly frank about the messy realities – menstruati­on, endometrio­sis, miscarriag­e – of Monroe’s much-drooled-over body. Will the film do for Monroe what Spencer, which shocked audiences with its unflinchin­g depiction of bulimia, did for Diana, Princess of Wales? “It’s very intimate,” confirms Oates. “There are elements of the movie that are quite horrific. In a very brilliant way.”

Dominik bills the movie as “a tragedy… an unwanted child who becomes the most wanted woman in the world and has to deal with all of the desire that is directed at her, and how confusing that is. It’s kind of a nightmare. It’s about being in a car with no brakes. It’s just going faster and faster and faster.”

Oates loves de Armas in the lead role – “she looks just like the young Marilyn” – but isn’t it a doomed exercise, I ask, trying to impersonat­e the most famous film star of all time? Oates disagrees. “Marilyn Monroe was a performanc­e. It was a whole persona of infantile female sexuality, a strange conjoining of innocence and this seductive, overthe-top glamour, with her platinum blonde hair and her whole manner – very breathy. If people called her at home, she wouldn’t answer that way. She would answer the way we’re talking. Her housekeepe­r said that too. When she was around the house in her jeans and a sweatshirt, she was nothing like that.

“Marilyn Monroe was a performanc­e – by Norma Jeane Baker. And so, in a sense, we could all try to do Marilyn.”

Born in 1926, Norma Jeane’s surname was first Mortensen, then Baker, as stepfather­s came and went. Rare among stars, she was a literal child of Hollywood: her mother, Gladys Baker, was a studio film-cutter. And her life began with a movie-esque mystery – the plot, in fact, of Mamma Mia! – who was Norma Jeane’s real father? The previous summer,

Gladys had slept with too many men to be sure. The only thing certain, as Monroe later put it, was that “I guess I was a mistake.”

It was a photograph of Norma Jeane Baker that gave Oates the idea for Blonde, precisely because the girl in the picture wasn’t blonde at all. “She was 16 and had this brunette hair and she was very pretty – but not glamorous,” Oates tells me. “The kind of girl who smiles, who goes into nursing – something that makes other people like them.”

Monroe’s miserable childhood – “Dickensian”, Hollywood was quick to brand it – reminded Oates of her own mother, “the ninth of nine children, and she had to be given away. Marilyn Monroe was also given away by her mother – she was put in an orphanage. And it was so unfair because her mother [by then in and out of institutio­ns for schizophre­nia] prevented her from being adopted.”

But Blonde – which Oates wrote as her own father was dying – could just as aptly have been called Daddy Issues. Norma Jeane, Oates tells me, “felt she had to live up to her invisible father. She was literally a bastard child [and] she always felt inadequate about that. And when she got to be about 12 or 14, she noticed that men and boys would really look at her. And kind of smile at her. And she’d smile back. Then she started wearing lipstick and tight sweaters. She was getting from the world these gazes of approval and interest that were new to her, and that buoyed her up

and made her feel better. Unfortunat­ely, there’s no end to that. A person who’s so wounded in childhood can never, never get enough love.

“So she wore people out – her husbands.” (Before DiMaggio came police officer James Dougherty; after, the playwright Arthur Miller.) “She called them Daddy. It sounds like a sad cliché, but she really called her lovers Daddy,” says Oates. “I can’t imagine being married or involved with a man whom I would call Daddy. To me it just would be… really, really weird.”

This juxtaposit­ion of the infantile with the hyper-sexual – which to us, seems so troublingl­y paedophili­c – was in the 1950s a cause for celebratio­n. In 1951, 20th Century Fox briefed the press that “With [Shirley] Temple, we had 20 rumours a year that she was kidnapped. With [Betty] Grable, we have 20 rumours a year that she was raped. With Monroe, we have 20 rumours a year that she has been raped and kidnapped.”

This “whispering, simpering, bigbreaste­d child woman” so infuriated the teenage Gloria Steinem that she walked out of Gentlemen Prefer Blondes “in embarrassm­ent”. Cecil Beaton found a diplomatic compromise when he called it “pure charade, a little girl’s caricature of Mae West. The puzzling truth is that Miss Monroe is a make-believe siren, unsophisti­cated as a Rhine maiden, innocent as a sleepwalke­r. She is an urchin pretending to be grown-up, having the time of her life in mother’s moth-eaten finery, tottering about in high-heeled shoes and sipping ginger ale as though it were a champagne cocktail. There is an otherworld­ly, a winsome naiveté about the child’s eyes…”

For Oates, fatherless­ness explains Norma Jeane’s drive to be perfect, taking night courses, acting lessons, dance classes – anything to better herself. “Norma Jeane always felt that if she could just be a little bit better, her father might actually acknowledg­e her. I think she felt that she had a father out there in the Hollywood hills, watching her career, and if she really, really did well, he would acknowledg­e her and bring her home.”

Oates planned Blonde as a novella, ending as Norma Jeane, after a brutal rape, gets a contract and is rechristen­ed Marilyn Monroe. “And then I thought – what am I doing? Her whole life is just beginning.” So Oates continued, fighting the “psy

‘Marilyn Monroe was a performanc­e – by a woman called Norma Jeane Baker’

chological malaise of writing about someone who is going to die, not because you make them die as a fictional character, but because she died. And she was so unhappy at the end of her life – just extremely depressed, on a kind of nightmare of barbiturat­es, maybe psychosis, not being able to sleep. Then if she wanted to work, she had to take amphetamin­es during the day. So she’s constantly on some drug or other, plus she had trouble with John Kennedy.

“It’s sort of like a ludicrous soap opera – instead of having trouble with your boyfriend, it’s actually the president of the United States.”

Monroe’s most famous loves were the American equivalent of aristocrat­s: a president, a baseball hero (DiMaggio), a literary lion (Miller). But she saw her appeal as proudly blue collar: “the kind of girl a truck driver would like”. The studios may have invented Marilyn Monroe but it was the people who made her a star. In 1951, she was named Miss Cheesecake of the Year by the army newspaper Stars and Stripes. While still being cast in bit parts, she was getting more fan mail than Gregory Peck: up to 3,000 letters a week. By 1953, it was up to 25,000 a week – a Hollywood record. But she had no clout: Jane Russell was paid $150,000 for Gentlemen Prefer Blondes, and Monroe only $15,000.

What Oates calls Monroe’s “sweet-baby cosmetic mask of a face” was a feat of plastic surgery (new nose, new jaw) and at least two hours a day in the make-up chair. But underneath it, she was no dumb blonde. She dreamt of playing Grushenka in The Brothers Karamazov. She was political: she forced a Hollywood nightclub to break its colour bar and book the jazz singer Ella Fitzgerald. “Sincerity and trying to be as simple or direct as possible is often taken for sheer stupidity,” she wrote. “But since it is not a sincere world – it’s very probable that being sincere is stupid.”

After a succession of sexy-childingen­ue parts, she longed to stop being Monroe for a while. “I had to get out, I just had to. The danger was, I began to believe this was all I could do – all I was – all any woman was.” So in 1955 she went to New York, to live with Lee and Paula Strasberg, of the Actors’ Studio. But although Henry Hathaway had publicly named her “the best natural actress I’ve directed”, the Strasbergs’ pop-Freudian “method” act

 ?? ??
 ?? ?? g ‘There are elements of the movie that are quite horrific’: far left, Ana de Armas in Blonde; left, Monroe in 1959
g ‘There are elements of the movie that are quite horrific’: far left, Ana de Armas in Blonde; left, Monroe in 1959
 ?? ?? ‘It is possible that she was assassinat­ed’: Blonde author Oates
‘It is possible that she was assassinat­ed’: Blonde author Oates
 ?? ?? ‘A person who’s so wounded in childhood can never, never get enough love’: Norma Jeane Baker in 1945
‘A person who’s so wounded in childhood can never, never get enough love’: Norma Jeane Baker in 1945

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom